Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 16:41 UTC

creativelifeform / three-nebula

WebGL based particle system engine for three.js

JavaScript · TypeScriptMIT★ 1,222 stars⑂ 94 forkssince Nov 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#webgl#threejs#particles#javascript

creativelifeform/three-nebula holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (80/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (52/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CreativelifeformOrganization
11 followers3 public repossince Feb 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmthree-nebula13.0.08,6393818 days agoparticlethree.js3d

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

69Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 6 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 123 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year123
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push6
active_weeks_last_year7

Release discipline

84Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 9 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 18 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~218.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count9
latest_release_tagv13.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release18
mean_days_between_releases218.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

73Good
How it's scored
50.1/60Stars — 1,222 stars
16.4/25Forks — 94 forks
6.7/15Watchers — 17 watchers
Inputs used
forks94
stars1,222
watchers17
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescoveralls.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

66Good
How it's scored
52.5/80Monthly downloads — 8,639 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesthree-nebula
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads8,639
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

18Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.993

Issue & PR responsiveness

52Moderate
How it's scored
24.3/42Issue resolution — 58% of issues closed
20.9/30PR acceptance — 134/192 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs134
open_issues35
closed_issues48
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d10
prs_decided_30d10
issue_closed_ratio0.578
closed_unmerged_prs58
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

54Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
7.8/25Owner reach — 11 followers of creativelifeform
16.4/25Track record — 3 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers11
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logincreativelifeform
public_repos3
account_age_days4,234

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 18 days ago
20/20Version history — 38 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesthree-nebula
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish18

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

74Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://three-nebula.org/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicswebgl, threejs, particles, javascript
has_wikino
homepagehttps://three-nebula.org/
docs_sitehttps://three-nebula.org/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

51Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories4
affected_packages4
assessed_packages205
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 205 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

56Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 77 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.77
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

43Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

81Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (tsconfig.json)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes — 3/215 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes254,690
source_files_sampled215
oversized_source_files3

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,222GitHub stars
4contributors
123commits, last 12 months
6days since last push
9releases
1bus factor
35open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 94 ⇿
0Stars
94Forks
7Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0204060801009242018-122022-102026-08
Major 2Minor 1Patch 4

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 16:40 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 205

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 205 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.7indirect
npm@bcoe/v8-coverage1.0.2indirect
npm@dimforge/rapier3d-compat0.12.0indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.11.2indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.2indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.2indirect
npm@gerrit0/mini-shiki3.23.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.6indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.139.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-android-arm-eabi1.76.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-android-arm641.76.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-darwin-arm641.76.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-darwin-x641.76.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-freebsd-x641.76.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.76.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-musleabihf1.76.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.76.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.76.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.76.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-gnu1.76.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-musl1.76.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.76.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.76.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-musl1.76.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-openharmony-arm641.76.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.76.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-win32-ia32-msvc1.76.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.76.0indirect
npm@playwright/test1.61.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-oniguruma3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/langs3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/themes3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/types3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/vscode-textmate10.0.2indirect
npm@sinonjs/commons1.7.1indirect
npm@sinonjs/formatio3.2.2indirect
npm@sinonjs/samsam3.3.3indirect
npm@sinonjs/text-encoding0.7.1indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@tweenjs/tween.js23.1.3indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.3indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/hast3.0.5indirect
npm@types/lodash4.17.24indirect
npm@types/node26.1.2indirect
npm@types/stats.js0.17.4indirect
npm@types/three0.185.1indirect
npm@types/unist3.0.3indirect
npm@types/webxr0.5.24indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-loong647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-sunos-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-x647.0.2indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v84.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.10indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmarray-from2.1.1indirect
npmassertion-error1.1.0indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmast-v8-to-istanbul1.0.5indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.9indirect
npmchai4.2.0indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmcheck-error1.0.2indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmdeep-eql3.0.1indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdiff3.5.1indirect
npmdomino2.1.4indirect
npmentities4.5.0indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.3.1indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.4.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfflate0.8.3indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmget-func-name2.0.2indirect
npmhas-flag3.0.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhtml-escaper2.0.2indirect
npmhusky9.1.7indirect
npmisarray0.0.1indirect
npmistanbul-lib-coverage3.2.2indirect
npmistanbul-lib-report3.0.1indirect
npmistanbul-reports3.2.0indirect
npmjs-tokens10.0.0indirect
npmjust-extend4.1.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlinkify-it5.0.2indirect
npmlodash4.18.1indirect
npmlolex4.2.0indirect
npmlolex5.1.2indirect
npmlunr2.3.9indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmagicast0.5.3indirect
npmmake-dir4.0.0indirect
npmmarkdown-it14.3.0indirect
npmmdurl2.1.0indirect
npmmeshoptimizer1.1.1indirect
npmminimatch10.2.6indirect
npmnanoid3.3.16indirect
npmnise1.5.3indirect
npmobug2.1.4indirect
npmoxlint1.76.0indirect
npmpath-to-regexp1.9.0indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpathval1.1.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmpixelmatch7.2.0indirect
npmplaywright1.61.1indirect
npmplaywright-core1.61.1indirect
npmpngjs7.0.0indirect
npmpostcss8.5.18indirect
npmpotpack1.0.2indirect
npmprettier3.9.6indirect
npmpunycode.js2.3.1indirect
npmrolldown1.1.5indirect
npmseedrandom3.0.5indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsinon7.5.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color5.5.0indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmthree0.185.1indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.2.4indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtype-detect4.0.8indirect
npmtypedoc0.28.20indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmuc.micro2.1.0indirect
npmundici-types8.3.0indirect
npmuuid11.1.1indirect
npmvite8.1.4indirect
npmvitest4.1.10indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmyaml2.9.0indirect
Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 205 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
nanoid3.3.16indirecthigh15.1.6
@vitest/mocker4.1.10indirectmoderate15.0.0-rc.2
postcss8.5.18indirectmoderate18.5.23
vitest4.1.10indirectmoderate15.0.0-rc.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with creativelifeform/three-nebula. Read them side by side →

98mrdoob/three.jsJavaScript 3D Library.Exceptional96specklesystems/speckle-serverThe Speckle Server, Frontend, 3D Viewer, & other JS utilities.Exceptional96mapbox/mapbox-gl-jsInteractive, thoroughly customizable maps in the browser, powered by vector tiles and WebGLExceptional96playcanvas/enginePowerful web graphics runtime built on WebGL, WebGPU, WebXR and glTFExceptional98CesiumGS/cesiumAn open-source JavaScript library for world-class 3D globes and maps :earth_americas:Exceptional97visgl/deck.glWebGL2 powered visualization frameworkExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.