Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 14:44 UTC

crowdin / crowdin-api-client-php

PHP client library for Crowdin API

PHPMIT★ 62 stars⑂ 36 forkssince Oct 2019View on GitHub ↗

crowdin/crowdin-api-client-php holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (85/100) and lowest on Security (55/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CrowdinOrganization · verified domain
516 followers36 public repossince Jun 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistcrowdin/crowdin-api-client1.24.071,5965232 days agoapiclientsdkapi-clientcrowdin

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 4 days ago
9/36Commit cadence13/52 weeks with commits
14.8/18Commit volume43 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained11 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year43
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year13
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases54 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 32 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~64.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count54
latest_release_tag1.24.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release32
mean_days_between_releases64.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
29/60Stars62 stars
12.9/25Forks36 forks
3.3/15Watchers5 watchers
Inputs used
forks36
stars62
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
64.7/80Monthly downloads71,596 downloads/month across packagist
4/20Registry dependents3 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagescrowdin/crowdin-api-client
dependents3
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads1,840,525
monthly_downloads71,596
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

85Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 46% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth25 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled25
top_contributor_share0.46
How it's scored
41.5/42Issue resolution99% of issues closed
28.1/30PR acceptance180/192 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 19/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs180
open_issues1
closed_issues91
prs_merged_7d3
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d7
prs_decided_30d7
issue_closed_ratio0.989
closed_unmerged_prs12
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
19.5/25Owner reach516 followers of crowdin
23.4/25Track record36 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers516
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logincrowdin
public_repos36
account_age_days5,569

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 32 days ago
20/20Version history52 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescrowdin/crowdin-api-client
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish32

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://packagist.org/packages/crowdin/crowdin-api-client
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscrowdin-api, sdk, client, php, api, hacktoberfest
has_wikino
homepagehttps://packagist.org/packages/crowdin/crowdin-api-client
docs_sitehttps://packagist.org/packages/crowdin/crowdin-api-client
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 19/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained11 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities15 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
14.8/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: guzzlehttp/guzzle 7.8.1 (high 7.2)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33.9/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 91 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories15
affected_packages4
assessed_packages60
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 60 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

65Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history99 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,622
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/377 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes44,388
source_files_sampled377
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

62GitHub stars
25contributors
43commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
54releases
2bus factor
1open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 36 ⇿
0Stars
36Forks
42Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383622020-022023-032026-04
Major 0Minor 20Patch 22

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
5.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 14:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 19/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained11 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities15 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle^6.2 || ^7composer.json
All dependencies 60

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 59 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.8.1direct
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.1.1indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.3indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator1.5.0indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer3.45.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises2.0.2indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.6.2indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.11.1indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser4.18.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.3indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage9.2.30indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator3.0.6indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker3.1.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template2.0.4indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer5.0.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit9.6.15indirect
Packagistpsr/container1.1.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.3indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log1.1.4indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser1.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit1.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup2.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator4.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity2.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff4.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment5.1.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter4.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state5.0.6indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code1.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector2.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context4.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/resource-operations3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/type3.2.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/version3.0.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/console5.4.34indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts2.5.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher5.4.34indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts2.5.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem5.4.25indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder5.4.27indirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver5.4.21indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.28.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.28.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.28.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.28.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php731.28.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php811.28.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process5.4.46indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts2.5.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatch5.4.21indirect
Packagistsymfony/string5.4.34indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.2.2indirect
Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 60 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
guzzlehttp/guzzle7.8.1directhigh98.0.1
phpunit/phpunit9.6.15indirecthigh112.5.8
guzzlehttp/psr72.6.2indirectmoderate42.12.3
symfony/process5.4.46indirectmoderate18.0.5

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.