Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 16:24 UTC

dapr / kit

Shared utility code for Dapr runtime

GoApache-2.0★ 21 stars⑂ 46 forkssince Apr 2021View on GitHub ↗

dapr/kit holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (82/100) and lowest on Security (47/100). It was last updated 16 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DaprOrganization · verified domain
1,963 followers45 public repossince Jun 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/dapr/kitv0.18.3-2952 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 16 days ago
11.1/36Commit cadence16/52 weeks with commits
12.7/18Commit volume25 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year25
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push16
active_weeks_last_year16
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases22 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 52 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~45.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count22
latest_release_tagv0.18.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release52
mean_days_between_releases45.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
21.1/60Stars21 stars
13.8/25Forks46 forks
6/15Watchers13 watchers
Inputs used
forks46
stars21
watchers13
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

82Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 35% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth30 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled30
top_contributor_share0.354
How it's scored
30.5/42Issue resolution73% of issues closed
26.9/30PR acceptance138/154 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs138
open_issues3
closed_issues8
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.727
closed_unmerged_prs16
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
23.7/25Owner reach1,963 followers of dapr
24.1/25Track record45 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,963
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logindapr
public_repos45
account_age_days2,650

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 52 days ago
20/20Version history29 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/dapr/kit
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish52

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

64Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests25 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2/2.5CI-Tests25 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0.8/7.5Vulnerabilities9 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
13/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories2 affected: google.golang.org/grpc v1.82.1 (high 7.5), golang.org/x/crypto v0.54.0 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories12
affected_packages3
assessed_packages40
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 40 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
8/10Demonstrated agent practice4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/168 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes29,874
source_files_sampled168
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

21GitHub stars
30contributors
25commits, last 12 months
16days since last push
22releases
2bus factor
3open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 46 ⇿
0Stars
46Forks
22Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010203040504622021-042023-122026-08
Major 0Minor 6Patch 16

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 16:24 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8CI-Tests25 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
1Vulnerabilities9 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 22
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/Microsoft/go-winiov0.6.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/alphadose/haxmapv1.3.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/cenkalti/backoff/v4v4.2.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/httprcv1.0.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/v2v2.0.21go.mod
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructurev1.5.1-0.20220423185008-bf980b35cac4go.mod
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.5.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/spiffe/go-spiffe/v2v2.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.10.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/tidwall/transformv0.0.0-20201103190739-32f242e2dbdego.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20231006140011-7918f672742dgo.mod
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.47.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260727163830-6c54dddc4772go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.82.1go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpc/examplesv0.0.0-20250407062114-b368379ef8f6go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11go.mod
Gogopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2v2.2.1go.mod
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.26.9go.mod
Gok8s.io/utilsv0.0.0-20230726121419-3b25d923346bgo.mod
All dependencies 40

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 22 direct and 18 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/alphadose/haxmapv1.3.1direct
Gogithub.com/cenkalti/backoff/v4v4.2.1direct
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.7.0direct
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/httprcv1.0.5direct
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/v2v2.0.21direct
Gogithub.com/microsoft/go-winiov0.6.2direct
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructurev1.5.1-0.20220423185008-bf980b35cac4direct
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.3direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.5.1direct
Gogithub.com/spiffe/go-spiffe/v2v2.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.10.0direct
Gogithub.com/tidwall/transformv0.0.0-20201103190739-32f242e2dbdedirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20231006140011-7918f672742ddirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.47.0direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260727163830-6c54dddc4772direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.82.1direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpc/examplesv0.0.0-20250407062114-b368379ef8f6direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11direct
Gogopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2v2.2.1direct
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.26.9direct
Gok8s.io/utilsv0.0.0-20230726121419-3b25d923346bdirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/dcrec/secp256k1/v4v4.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4v4.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-jsonv0.10.2indirect
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobufv1.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/blackmagicv1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/httpccv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/iterv1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/lestrrat-go/optionv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/segmentio/asmv1.2.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.37.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.57.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/inf.v0v0.9.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 40 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
google.golang.org/grpcv1.82.1directhigh61.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
golang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0directunknown40.56.0
golang.org/x/modv0.37.0indirectunknown21.27.0-rc.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.