Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 23:57 UTC

datalust / seq-app-mail

Notify from Seq using a variety of email services.

C# · HTMLApache-2.0★ 6 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Jul 2023View on GitHub ↗

datalust/seq-app-mail holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (65/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (40/100). It was last updated 15 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DatalustOrganization
131 followers57 public repossince Nov 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetSeq.App.Mail.AmazonSes1.2.0-341 days agoseq-appamazonawssessimpleemailservice
NuGetSeq.App.Mail.Microsoft3651.2.0-441 days agoseq-appmicrosoft-365email
NuGetSeq.App.Mail.Smtp1.2.0-441 days agoseq-appsmtpemail
NuGetSeq.Mail1.2.0-441 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

65Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 15 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
13.3/18Commit volume — 29 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year29
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push15
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 4 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 41 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~315.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tagv1.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release41
mean_days_between_releases315.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
11.3/60Stars — 6 stars
4/25Forks — 4 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars6
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
48.8/80Total downloads — 49,430 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesSeq.App.Mail.AmazonSes, Seq.App.Mail.Microsoft365, Seq.App.Mail.Smtp, Seq.Mail
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads49,430
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 96% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.961
How it's scored
37.8/42Issue resolution — 90% of issues closed
29/30PR acceptance — 30/31 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 7/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs30
open_issues1
closed_issues9
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.9
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
15.2/25Owner reach — 131 followers of datalust
24.8/25Track record — 57 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers131
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logindatalust
public_repos57
account_age_days4,694
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 4 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 41 days ago
12/20Version history — 4 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesSeq.App.Mail.AmazonSes, Seq.App.Mail.Microsoft365, Seq.App.Mail.Smtp, Seq.Mail
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish41

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 10 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests — 10 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 7/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages13
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 13 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

45Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
14.9/40Legible commit history — 28 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.28
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — harness/Seq.Mail.TestHarness/Seq.Mail.TestHarness.csproj, src/Seq.App.Mail.AmazonSes/Seq.App.Mail.AmazonSes.csproj, src/Seq.App.Mail.Microsoft365/Seq.App.Mail.Microsoft365.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsharness/Seq.Mail.TestHarness/Seq.Mail.TestHarness.csproj, src/Seq.App.Mail.AmazonSes/Seq.App.Mail.AmazonSes.csproj, src/Seq.App.Mail.Microsoft365/Seq.App.Mail.Microsoft365.csproj, src/Seq.App.Mail.Smtp/Seq.App.Mail.Smtp.csproj, src/Seq.Apps.Testing/Seq.Apps.Testing.csproj, src/Seq.Mail/Seq.Mail.csproj, test/Seq.Mail.Tests/Seq.Mail.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/33 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes4,357
source_files_sampled33
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

6GitHub stars
3contributors
29commits, last 12 months
15days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
1open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿
0Stars
4Forks
4Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1223344412023-082025-022026-08
Major 1Minor 2Patch 1

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 23:56 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8CI-Tests10 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 7/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 14
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Console6.1.1harness/Seq.Mail.TestHarness/Seq.Mail.TestHarness.csproj
NuGetSeq.Apps2023.4.0src/Seq.App.Mail.AmazonSes/Seq.App.Mail.AmazonSes.csproj
NuGetAWSSDK.SimpleEmail4.0.100.7src/Seq.App.Mail.AmazonSes/Seq.App.Mail.AmazonSes.csproj
NuGetSeq.Apps2023.4.0src/Seq.App.Mail.Microsoft365/Seq.App.Mail.Microsoft365.csproj
NuGetAzure.Identity1.21.0src/Seq.App.Mail.Microsoft365/Seq.App.Mail.Microsoft365.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Graph6.2.0src/Seq.App.Mail.Microsoft365/Seq.App.Mail.Microsoft365.csproj
NuGetSeq.Apps2023.4.0src/Seq.App.Mail.Smtp/Seq.App.Mail.Smtp.csproj
NuGetSeq.Apps2023.4.0src/Seq.Apps.Testing/Seq.Apps.Testing.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Formatting.Compact3.0.0src/Seq.Apps.Testing/Seq.Apps.Testing.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Formatting.Compact.Reader4.0.0src/Seq.Apps.Testing/Seq.Apps.Testing.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4src/Seq.Apps.Testing/Seq.Apps.Testing.csproj
NuGetmailkit4.17.0src/Seq.Mail/Seq.Mail.csproj
NuGetSeq.Apps2023.4.0src/Seq.Mail/Seq.Mail.csproj
NuGetSeq.Syntax2.0.0-dev-00098src/Seq.Mail/Seq.Mail.csproj
All dependencies 13

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 3 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAWSSDK.SimpleEmail4.0.100.7direct
NuGetAzure.Identity1.21.0direct
NuGetMailKit4.17.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Graph6.2.0direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4direct
NuGetSeq.Apps2023.4.0direct
NuGetSeq.Syntax2.0.0-dev-00098direct
NuGetSerilog.Formatting.Compact3.0.0direct
NuGetSerilog.Formatting.Compact.Reader4.0.0direct
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Console6.1.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1indirect
NuGetxunit2.9.3indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 13 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.