Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 11:39 UTC

dawoe / umbraco-multilanguage-textbox

CSSMIT★ 1 star⑂ 3 forkssince Mar 2020View on GitHub ↗

dawoe/umbraco-multilanguage-textbox holds a health index of 47 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (69/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (32/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

47
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

47
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 48 is calibrated to 47 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Dave WoestenborghsPersonal account
61 followers60 public repossince Nov 2011TrueLime

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

69Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 3 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence5/52 weeks with commits
14.4/18Commit volume39 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained13 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year39
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year5
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases15 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 3 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~153.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tag18.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases153.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

34At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars1 stars
2.5/25Forks3 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars1
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesci.appveyor.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

43Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
10.3/30PR acceptance10/29 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs10
open_issues0
closed_issues6
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs19
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
12.9/25Owner reach61 followers of dawoe
25/25Track record60 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers61
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_logindawoe
public_repos60
account_age_days5,421
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

46Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained13 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities13 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate3.5

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories22
affected_packages6
assessed_packages208
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 4, low 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 208 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

32At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
4.8/40Legible commit history9 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.09
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/code/Our.Umbraco.MultilanguageTextbox.Core/Our.Umbraco.MultilanguageTextbox.Core.csproj, src/code/Our.Umbraco.MultilanguageTextbox.UI/Our.Umbraco.MultilanguageTextbox.UI.csproj, src/code/Our.Umbraco.MultilanguageTextbox/Our.Umbraco.MultilanguageTextbox.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingsrc/code/Our.Umbraco.MultilanguageTextbox.UI.Client/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json, packages.lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configssrc/code/Our.Umbraco.MultilanguageTextbox.UI.Client/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/code/Our.Umbraco.MultilanguageTextbox.Core/Our.Umbraco.MultilanguageTextbox.Core.csproj, src/code/Our.Umbraco.MultilanguageTextbox.UI/Our.Umbraco.MultilanguageTextbox.UI.csproj, src/code/Our.Umbraco.MultilanguageTextbox/Our.Umbraco.MultilanguageTextbox.csproj, src/testsites/Website-V13/Website-V13.csproj, src/testsites/Website-V17/Website-V17.csproj, src/testsites/Website-V18/Website-V18.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codeCSS with type-check config (src/code/Our.Umbraco.MultilanguageTextbox.UI.Client/tsconfig.json)
49.3/55Manageable file sizes3/29 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageCSS
largest_source_bytes121,128
source_files_sampled29
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

1GitHub stars
1contributors
39commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
15releases
1bus factor
0open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿
0Stars
3Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12233312024-112025-062026-01

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.5 / 10
3.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 11:39 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained13 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities13 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 208

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 208 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@heximal/expressions0.1.5indirect
npm@hey-api/codegen-core0.9.1indirect
npm@hey-api/json-schema-ref-parser1.4.4indirect
npm@hey-api/openapi-ts0.99.0indirect
npm@hey-api/shared0.5.0indirect
npm@hey-api/spec-types0.2.0indirect
npm@hey-api/types0.1.4indirect
npm@jsdevtools/ono7.1.3indirect
npm@lit-labs/ssr-dom-shim1.5.1indirect
npm@lit/reactive-element2.1.2indirect
npm@lukeed/ms2.0.2indirect
npm@microsoft/signalr10.0.0indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.149.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm-eabi1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@tiptap/core3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-blockquote3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-bold3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-bullet-list3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-code3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-code-block3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-document3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-dropcursor3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-gapcursor3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-hard-break3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-heading3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-horizontal-rule3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-image3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-italic3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-link3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-list3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-list-item3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-list-keymap3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-ordered-list3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-paragraph3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-strike3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-subscript3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-superscript3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-table3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-text3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-text-align3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-text-style3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extension-underline3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/extensions3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/pm3.31.3indirect
npm@tiptap/starter-kit3.31.3indirect
npm@types/diff7.0.2indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@types/trusted-types2.0.7indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-loong647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-sunos-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-x647.0.2indirect
npm@umbraco-cms/backoffice18.0.0indirect
npm@umbraco-ui/uui2.0.2indirect
npmabort-controller3.0.0indirect
npmansi-colors4.1.3indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbundle-name4.1.0indirect
npmc123.3.4indirect
npmchokidar5.0.0indirect
npmcolor-support1.1.3indirect
npmcommander15.0.0indirect
npmconfbox0.2.4indirect
npmconfbox0.3.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmculori4.0.2indirect
npmdefault-browser5.5.1indirect
npmdefault-browser-id5.0.1indirect
npmdefine-lazy-prop3.0.0indirect
npmdefu6.1.7indirect
npmdestr2.0.5indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdiff9.0.0indirect
npmdompurify3.4.8indirect
npmdotenv17.4.2indirect
npmelement-internals-polyfill3.0.2indirect
npmevent-target-shim5.0.1indirect
npmeventsource2.0.2indirect
npmexsolve1.1.1indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfetch-cookie2.2.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmget-tsconfig4.14.0indirect
npmgiget3.3.1indirect
npmis-docker3.0.0indirect
npmis-in-ssh1.0.0indirect
npmis-inside-container1.0.0indirect
npmis-wsl3.1.1indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjiti2.6.1indirect
npmjs-yaml4.2.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlinkifyjs4.3.3indirect
npmlit3.3.2indirect
npmlit-element4.2.2indirect
npmlit-html3.3.2indirect
npmluxon3.7.2indirect
npmmarked14.0.0indirect
npmmarked18.0.13indirect
npmmonaco-editor0.56.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.19indirect
npmnode-fetch2.7.0indirect
npmohash2.0.12indirect
npmopen11.0.0indirect
npmorderedmap2.1.1indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmperfect-debounce2.1.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.7indirect
npmpkg-types2.3.3indirect
npmpostcss8.5.28indirect
npmpowershell-utils0.1.0indirect
npmprosemirror-changeset2.4.2indirect
npmprosemirror-commands1.7.2indirect
npmprosemirror-dropcursor1.8.3indirect
npmprosemirror-gapcursor1.4.1indirect
npmprosemirror-history1.5.0indirect
npmprosemirror-inputrules1.5.1indirect
npmprosemirror-keymap1.2.3indirect
npmprosemirror-model1.25.11indirect
npmprosemirror-schema-list1.5.1indirect
npmprosemirror-state1.4.4indirect
npmprosemirror-tables1.8.5indirect
npmprosemirror-transform1.12.1indirect
npmprosemirror-view1.42.3indirect
npmpsl1.15.0indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmquerystringify2.2.0indirect
npmrc93.1.0indirect
npmreaddirp5.1.1indirect
npmrequires-port1.0.0indirect
npmresolve-pkg-maps1.0.0indirect
npmrolldown1.2.8indirect
npmrope-sequence1.3.4indirect
npmrun-applescript7.1.0indirect
npmrxjs7.8.2indirect
npmsemver7.8.4indirect
npmset-cookie-parser2.7.2indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtough-cookie4.1.4indirect
npmtr460.0.3indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmuniversalify0.2.0indirect
npmurl-parse1.5.10indirect
npmuuid14.0.2indirect
npmvite8.2.2indirect
npmw3c-keyname2.2.8indirect
npmwebidl-conversions3.0.1indirect
npmwhatwg-url5.0.0indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmws7.5.10indirect
npmwsl-utils0.3.1indirect
NuGetClean4.1.0indirect
NuGetClean7.0.5indirect
NuGetClean8.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.ICU.ICU4C.Runtime72.1.0.3indirect
NuGetUmbraco.Cms13.0.0indirect
NuGetUmbraco.Cms17.0.0indirect
NuGetUmbraco.Cms18.0.1indirect
NuGetUmbraco.Cms.DevelopmentMode.Backoffice17.0.0indirect
NuGetUmbraco.Cms.DevelopmentMode.Backoffice18.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 208 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
Umbraco.Cms13.0.0indirectcritical818.0.2
js-yaml4.2.0indirecthigh34.3.2
Umbraco.Cms17.0.0indirecthigh518.0.2
Umbraco.Cms18.0.1indirecthigh118.0.2
ws7.5.10indirecthigh18.21.0
dompurify3.4.8indirectlow43.4.13

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.