Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 16:05 UTC

dawsbot / satoshi-bitcoin

Convert precisely between Satoshi and Bitcoin

JavaScriptMIT★ 42 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Jul 2015View on GitHub ↗

dawsbot/satoshi-bitcoin holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (63/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (45/100). It was last updated 41 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Dawson BotsfordPersonal account

1,194 followers100 public repossince Jan 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	satoshi-bitcoin	1.0.7	14,800	16	41 days ago	bitcoin satoshi conversion cryptocurrency math arbitrary precision arithmetic big integer int number biginteger bigint bignumber decimal float

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

45Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

32At Risk

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 41 days ago
1.4/36	Commit cadence — 2/52 weeks with commits
7.6/18	Commit volume — 6 commits in the last year
5/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

commits_last_year	6
human_commit_share	0.988
days_since_last_push	41
active_weeks_last_year	2

Release discipline

64Moderate

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 14 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 68 days ago
5.4/27	Release cadence — a release every ~420.2 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	14
latest_release_tag	v1.0.6
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	68
mean_days_between_releases	420.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

32At Risk

How it's scored

26.2/60	Stars — 42 stars
5.8/25	Forks — 6 forks
0/15	Watchers — 2 watchers

Inputs used

forks	6
stars	42
watchers	2
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	6
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	badge.fury.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

70Good

How it's scored

55.6/80	Monthly downloads — 14,800 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	satoshi-bitcoin
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	14,800
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

24At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.9/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 92% of commits
2.7/13.5	Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	2
top_contributor_share	0.915

Issue & PR responsiveness

61Moderate

How it's scored

36/42	Issue resolution — 86% of issues closed
15.5/30	PR acceptance — 16/31 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	16
open_issues	1
closed_issues	6
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.857
closed_unmerged_prs	15
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

71Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
22.1/25	Owner reach — 1,194 followers of dawsbot
25/25	Track record — 100 public repos, account ~13 yr old

Inputs used

followers	1,194
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	dawsbot
public_repos	100
account_age_days	4,977

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 41 days ago
20/20	Version history — 16 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	satoshi-bitcoin
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	41

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

63Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

72Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .eslintrc
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
8/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 5 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	bitcoin, crypto, satoshi
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

40Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1/2.5	CI-Tests — 5 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 4/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
3.8/7.5	Maintained — 6 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5	Packaging — no data
1.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 33 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	1
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:satoshi-bitcoin@1.0.7 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 1 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

45Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

14Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
14.3/40	Legible commit history — 22 of 82 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.268
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

64Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .eslintrc
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 5 of the last 83 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 83 commits are automated dependency updates
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.06
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.012

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/4 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	18,314
source_files_sampled	4
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

42GitHub stars

2contributors

6commits, last 12 months

41days since last push

14releases

1bus factor

1open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿

0Stars

6Forks

2Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 0Patch 2

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10

4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 16:05 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
4	CI-Tests	5 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 4/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10	Contributors	project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
5	Maintained	6 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
3	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	33 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 1

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	big.js	`^3.1.3`	package.json

All dependencies 177

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 176 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	big.js	`3.2.0`	direct
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	acorn	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	acorn	`5.7.4`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	ajv	`4.11.8`	indirect
npm	ajv-keywords	`1.5.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-escapes	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	argparse	`1.0.10`	indirect
npm	assertion-error	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect
npm	buffer-from	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	caller-path	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	callsites	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	chai	`3.5.0`	indirect
npm	chalk	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	circular-json	`0.3.3`	indirect
npm	cli-cursor	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	cli-width	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	co	`4.6.0`	indirect
npm	code-point-at	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	commander	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	commander	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	concat-stream	`1.6.2`	indirect
npm	core-util-is	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	d	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	debug	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	debug	`2.6.9`	indirect
npm	deep-eql	`0.1.3`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.3`	indirect
npm	diff	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	doctrine	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	es5-ext	`0.10.53`	indirect
npm	es6-iterator	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	es6-map	`0.1.5`	indirect
npm	es6-set	`0.1.5`	indirect
npm	es6-symbol	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	es6-symbol	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	es6-weak-map	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	escope	`3.6.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`2.13.1`	indirect
npm	espree	`3.5.4`	indirect
npm	esprima	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	event-emitter	`0.3.5`	indirect
npm	exit-hook	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	ext	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	figures	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`1.3.4`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	generate-function	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	generate-object-property	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	glob	`3.2.11`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.1.7`	indirect
npm	globals	`9.18.0`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.6`	indirect
npm	growl	`1.9.2`	indirect
npm	has-ansi	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	ignore	`3.3.10`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	inquirer	`0.12.0`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-my-ip-valid	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-my-json-valid	`2.20.5`	indirect
npm	is-property	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	is-resolvable	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	isarray	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	jade	`0.26.3`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`3.14.1`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	jsonify	`0.0.0`	indirect
npm	jsonpointer	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.17.21`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`2.7.3`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	minimist	`0.0.8`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	mkdirp	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	mkdirp	`0.5.1`	indirect
npm	mkdirp	`0.5.5`	indirect
npm	mocha	`2.5.3`	indirect
npm	ms	`0.7.1`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	mute-stream	`0.0.5`	indirect
npm	next-tick	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	number-is-nan	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	object-assign	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	onetime	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.8.3`	indirect
npm	os-homedir	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	path-is-absolute	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-is-inside	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	pluralize	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	process-nextick-args	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	progress	`1.1.8`	indirect
npm	readable-stream	`2.3.7`	indirect
npm	readline2	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	require-uncached	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	restore-cursor	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	rimraf	`2.6.3`	indirect
npm	run-async	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	rx-lite	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	shelljs	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	sigmund	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	slice-ansi	`0.0.4`	indirect
npm	sprintf-js	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	string-width	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	string-width	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	string_decoder	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	table	`3.8.3`	indirect
npm	text-table	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	through	`2.3.8`	indirect
npm	to-iso-string	`0.0.2`	indirect
npm	type	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	type	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.3.2`	indirect
npm	type-detect	`0.1.1`	indirect
npm	type-detect	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	typedarray	`0.0.6`	indirect
npm	user-home	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	util-deprecate	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	word-wrap	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	write	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	xtend	`4.0.2`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:satoshi-bitcoin@1.0.7 pulls in 1 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records