Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 06:38 UTC

ddnexus / pagy

Agnostic pagination in plain ruby

Ruby · JavaScript · TypeScriptMIT★ 4,990 stars⑂ 446 forkssince Dec 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined
#ruby#rails#sinatra#padrino#bootstrap#bulma#searchkick#elasticsearch-rails#hanami#jsonapi#meilisearch#typesense-rails

ddnexus/pagy holds a health index of 93 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (53/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

93
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

93
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Domizio DemichelisPersonal account
112 followers29 public repossince Jul 2009

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemspagy43.6.2-2653 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

93Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
29.1/36Commit cadence — 42/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 372 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 25 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year372
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year42

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 93 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~15.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count93
latest_release_tag43.6.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases15.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

88Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

90Excellent
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 4,990 stars
22.1/25Forks — 446 forks
8.1/15Watchers — 30 watchers
Inputs used
forks446
stars4,990
watchers30
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges11
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

99Exceptional
How it's scored
79.3/80Total downloads — 42,751,636 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespagy
dependents—
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads42,751,636
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

31At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 90% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.903

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
21/30PR acceptance — 330/471 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs330
open_issues0
closed_issues317
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs141
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1

Ownership & stewardship

60Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
14.8/25Owner reach — 112 followers of ddnexus
22.8/25Track record — 29 public repos, account ~17 yr old
Inputs used
followers112
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginddnexus
public_repos29
account_age_days6,266
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history — 265 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespagy
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml, eslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://ddnexus.github.io/pagy/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 12 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsruby, rails, sinatra, padrino, bootstrap, bulma, searchkick, elasticsearch-rails, hanami, jsonapi, meilisearch, typesense-rails
has_wikino
homepagehttps://ddnexus.github.io/pagy/
docs_sitehttps://ddnexus.github.io/pagy/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

54Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
1.2/2.5CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: Passing
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 25 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages120
unassessed_packages9
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 120 resolved dependencies against OSV. 9 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

26At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://ddnexus.github.io/pagy/llms.txt)
10.9/40Legible commit history — 20 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://ddnexus.github.io/pagy/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.204
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

62Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml, eslint.config.js
11/11Static type checking — src/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Ruby with type-check config (src/tsconfig.json)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes — 1/196 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes511,269
source_files_sampled196
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

4,990GitHub stars
99contributors
372commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
93releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 446 ⇿
0Stars
446Forks
92Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0100200300400500446222018-032022-062026-08
Major 4Minor 16Patch 69

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10
5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 06:38 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
5CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: Passing
1Code-ReviewFound 3/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained25 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsrake—Gemfile
RubyGemsgroupdate—Gemfile
RubyGemspuma—Gemfile
RubyGemsrackup—Gemfile
RubyGemsrails~> 8.0Gemfile
RubyGemsrouge—Gemfile
RubyGemssequel—Gemfile
RubyGemssinatra—Gemfile
RubyGemssqlite3—Gemfile
All dependencies 129

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 120 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsgroupdate6.8.0direct
RubyGemspuma8.0.2direct
RubyGemsrackup2.3.1direct
RubyGemsrails8.1.3.1direct
RubyGemsrake13.4.2direct
RubyGemsrouge5.0.0direct
RubyGemssequel5.107.0direct
RubyGemssinatra4.2.1direct
RubyGemssqlite32.9.5direct
npm@eslint/compat^2.1.0indirect
npm@eslint/js10.0.1indirect
npm@stylistic/eslint-plugin^5.10.0indirect
npm@types/eslint__js^9.14.0indirect
npm@types/node25.9.5indirect
npmeslint10.8.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-align-assignments^1.1.2indirect
npmeslint-plugin-promise7.3.0indirect
npmpuppeteer25.4.0indirect
npmretypeapp-linux-x64^4.6.0indirect
npmtaze^19.17.1indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmtypescript-eslint8.65.0indirect
RubyGemsaction_text-trix2.1.19indirect
RubyGemsactioncable8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactionmailbox8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactionmailer8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactionpack8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactiontext8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactionview8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactivejob8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactiverecord8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactivestorage8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsansi1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.3indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.1.2indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.3.0indirect
RubyGemschildprocess5.1.0indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.8indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool3.0.2indirect
RubyGemscrass1.0.7indirect
RubyGemsdate3.5.1indirect
RubyGemsdebug1.11.1indirect
RubyGemsdigest-xxhash0.2.9indirect
RubyGemsdomain_name0.6.20240107indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.3indirect
RubyGemserb6.0.6indirect
RubyGemserubi1.13.1indirect
RubyGemsferrum0.17.2indirect
RubyGemsglobalid1.4.0indirect
RubyGemshttp6.0.4indirect
RubyGemshttp-cookie1.1.6indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.15.2indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.8.2indirect
RubyGemsirb1.18.0indirect
RubyGemsjson—indirect
RubyGemsjson2.21.2indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.6indirect
RubyGemslint_roller1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsllhttp0.6.2indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsloofah2.25.2indirect
RubyGemsmail2.9.1indirect
RubyGemsmarcel1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsmini_mime1.1.5indirect
RubyGemsminitest6.0.6indirect
RubyGemsminitest-holdify1.3.7indirect
RubyGemsminitest-hooks1.5.4indirect
RubyGemsminitest-mock5.27.0indirect
RubyGemsminitest-reporters1.8.0indirect
RubyGemsmustermann3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsnet-imap0.6.6indirect
RubyGemsnet-pop0.1.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-protocol0.2.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-smtp0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.7.5indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.4indirect
RubyGemsoj3.17.5indirect
RubyGemsostruct0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsparallel2.1.0indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.12.0indirect
RubyGemspp0.6.4indirect
RubyGemsprettyprint0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsprism1.9.0indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.5indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrack3.2.6indirect
RubyGemsrack-protection4.2.1indirect
RubyGemsrack-session2.1.2indirect
RubyGemsrack-test2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrails-dom-testing2.3.0indirect
RubyGemsrails-html-sanitizer1.7.1indirect
RubyGemsrails-i18n8.1.0indirect
RubyGemsrailties8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrbs4.1.2indirect
RubyGemsrdoc8.0.0indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.12.0indirect
RubyGemsreline0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsrubocop1.88.2indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.50.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-minitest0.40.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-packaging0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-performance1.26.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rake0.7.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-thread_safety0.7.3indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.4.1indirect
RubyGemssimplecov1.0.3indirect
RubyGemsstrscan3.1.8indirect
RubyGemsthor1.5.0indirect
RubyGemstilt2.8.0indirect
RubyGemstimeout0.6.1indirect
RubyGemstsort0.2.0indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode-emoji4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsuri—indirect
RubyGemsuri1.1.1indirect
RubyGemsuseragent0.16.11indirect
RubyGemswebrick1.9.2indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-driver0.8.2indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-extensions0.1.5indirect
RubyGemsyaml—indirect
RubyGemsyaml0.4.0indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.8.3indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 120 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 9 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ddnexus/pagy. Read them side by side →

98rails/railsRuby on RailsExceptional98chatwoot/chatwootOpen-source live-chat, email support, omni-channel desk. An alternative to Intercom, Zendesk, Salesforce Service Cloud etc. 🔥💬Exceptional97primer/view_componentsViewComponents for the Primer Design SystemExceptional96activeadmin/activeadminThe administration framework for Ruby on Rails applications.Exceptional96avo-hq/avoThe Essential Toolkit for building Internal Tools and admin panels with Ruby on RailsExceptional96discourse/discourseA platform for community discussion. Free, open, simple.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.