Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-16 11:57 UTC

dechristopher / lioctad

♚ lioctad.org: the forever free, adless and open source octad server

Go · JavaScriptAGPL-3.0★ 7 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Feb 2021View on GitHub ↗
#game#octad#go#server#chess#rating#gofiber#websocket#deploy#position#varaint

dechristopher/lioctad holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (85/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (46/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AndrewPersonal account
45 followers51 public repossince May 2015

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/dechristopher/liopoints to another repo — not scoredv0.9.21-251 day ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

67Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence — 4/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 134 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year134
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year4

Release discipline

88Excellent
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 25 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count25
latest_release_tagv0.9.21
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases0.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

13Critical
How it's scored
12.6/60Stars — 7 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars7
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

46Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

28At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 85% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.848

Issue & PR responsiveness

57Moderate
How it's scored
31.5/42Issue resolution — 75% of issues closed
17.7/30PR acceptance — 101/171 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs101
open_issues2
closed_issues6
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.75
closed_unmerged_prs70
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

58Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12/25Owner reach — 45 followers of dechristopher
24.5/25Track record — 51 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers45
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logindechristopher
public_repos51
account_age_days4,066
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yaml, .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://lioctad.org
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 11 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgame, octad, go, server, chess, rating, gofiber, websocket, deploy, position, varaint
has_wikino
homepagehttps://lioctad.org
docs_sitehttps://lioctad.org
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

61Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

85Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — src/vendor/github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3/AGENTS.md, src/vendor/github.com/jackc/pgx/v5/CLAUDE.md, src/vendor/github.com/minio/minio-go/v7/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filessrc/vendor/github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3/AGENTS.md, src/vendor/github.com/jackc/pgx/v5/CLAUDE.md, src/vendor/github.com/minio/minio-go/v7/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,561
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

88Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — src/vendor/github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3/Makefile, src/vendor/github.com/gofiber/schema/Makefile, src/vendor/github.com/gofiber/utils/v2/Makefile, src/vendor/github.com/jackc/pgx/v5/mise.toml, src/vendor/github.com/looplab/fsm/Makefile, src/vendor/github.com/minio/minio-go/v7/Makefile, src/vendor/github.com/pressly/goose/v3/Makefile, src/vendor/github.com/redis/go-redis/v9/Makefile, src/vendor/github.com/zeebo/xxh3/Makefile, src/vendor/go.uber.org/atomic/Makefile, src/vendor/go.uber.org/multierr/Makefile, src/vendor/gopkg.in/ini.v1/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yaml, .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, Nix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filessrc/vendor/github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3/Makefile, src/vendor/github.com/gofiber/schema/Makefile, src/vendor/github.com/gofiber/utils/v2/Makefile, src/vendor/github.com/jackc/pgx/v5/mise.toml, src/vendor/github.com/looplab/fsm/Makefile, src/vendor/github.com/minio/minio-go/v7/Makefile, src/vendor/github.com/pressly/goose/v3/Makefile, src/vendor/github.com/redis/go-redis/v9/Makefile, src/vendor/github.com/zeebo/xxh3/Makefile, src/vendor/go.uber.org/atomic/Makefile, src/vendor/go.uber.org/multierr/Makefile, src/vendor/gopkg.in/ini.v1/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes — 3/200 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes127,185
source_files_sampled200
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

7GitHub stars
4contributors
134commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
25releases
1bus factor
2open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • go package 'github.com/dechristopher/lio' points at a different repository (https://github.com/dechristopher/lio); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10
6.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-16 11:57 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 18
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/a-h/templv0.3.1020src/go.mod
Gogithub.com/asaskevich/EventBusv0.0.0-20200907212545-49d423059eefsrc/go.mod
Gogithub.com/dechristopher/octad/v2v2.1.0src/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gofiber/contrib/v3/websocketv1.2.1src/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gofiber/fiber/v3v3.4.0src/go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0src/go.mod
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v5v5.10.0src/go.mod
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1src/go.mod
Gogithub.com/looplab/fsmv1.0.3src/go.mod
Gogithub.com/minio/minio-go/v7v7.2.1src/go.mod
Gogithub.com/pressly/goose/v3v3.27.2src/go.mod
Gogithub.com/redis/go-redis/v9v9.21.0src/go.mod
Gogithub.com/skip2/go-qrcodev0.0.0-20200617195104-da1b6568686esrc/go.mod
Gogithub.com/srwiley/oksvgv0.0.0-20221011165216-be6e8873101csrc/go.mod
Gogithub.com/srwiley/rasterxv0.0.0-20220730225603-2ab79fcdd4efsrc/go.mod
Gogithub.com/valyala/fastjsonv1.6.10src/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/imagev0.44.0src/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0src/go.mod
All dependencies 61

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 22 direct and 39 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/a-h/templv0.3.1020direct
Gogithub.com/asaskevich/eventbusv0.0.0-20200907212545-49d423059eefdirect
Gogithub.com/dechristopher/octad/v2v2.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/gofiber/contrib/v3/websocketv1.2.1direct
Gogithub.com/gofiber/fiber/v3v3.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v5v5.10.0direct
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenv1.3.0direct
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1direct
Gogithub.com/looplab/fsm0.2.0direct
Gogithub.com/looplab/fsmv1.0.3direct
Gogithub.com/minio/minio-go/v77.0.10direct
Gogithub.com/minio/minio-go/v7v7.2.1direct
Gogithub.com/pressly/goose/v3v3.27.2direct
Gogithub.com/redis/go-redis/v9v9.21.0direct
Gogithub.com/skip2/go-qrcodev0.0.0-20200617195104-da1b6568686edirect
Gogithub.com/srwiley/oksvgv0.0.0-20221011165216-be6e8873101cdirect
Gogithub.com/srwiley/rasterxv0.0.0-20220730225603-2ab79fcdd4efdirect
Gogithub.com/valyala/fastjson1.6.3direct
Gogithub.com/valyala/fastjsonv1.6.10direct
Gogolang.org/x/imagev0.44.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0direct
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/brotliv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/dechristopher/octad1.0.8indirect
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/fasthttp/websocketv1.5.12indirect
Gogithub.com/gofiber/fiber/v22.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gofiber/schemav1.8.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gofiber/template1.6.6indirect
Gogithub.com/gofiber/utils/v2v2.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/gofiber/websocket/v22.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgpassfilev1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgservicefilev0.0.0-20240606120523-5a60cdf6a761indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/puddle/v2v2.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.19.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/crc32v1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/kr/textv0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.15indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.22indirect
Gogithub.com/mfridman/interpolatev0.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/minio/crc64nvmev1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/minio/md5-simdv1.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/philhofer/fwdv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errors0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/rs/xidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/savsgio/gotilsv0.0.0-20250924091648-bce9a52d7761indirect
Gogithub.com/sethvargo/go-retryv0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tinylib/msgpv1.6.4indirect
Gogithub.com/valyala/bytebufferpoolv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/valyala/fasthttpv1.72.0indirect
Gogithub.com/zeebo/xxh3v1.1.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/atomicv1.11.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.11.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.4indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.53.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.56.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.46.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/ini.v1v1.67.3indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with dechristopher/lioctad. Read them side by side →

97gofr-dev/gofrAn opinionated GoLang framework for accelerated microservice development. Built in support for databases and observability.Exceptional96google/go-cloudThe Go Cloud Development Kit (Go CDK): A library and tools for open cloud development in Go.Exceptional95gin-gonic/ginGin is a high-performance HTTP web framework written in Go. It provides a Martini-like API but with significantly better performance—up to 40 times faster—thanks to httprouter. Gin is designed for building REST APIs, web applications, and microservices.Exceptional94labstack/echoHigh performance, minimalist Go web frameworkExceptional94zitadel/oidcEasy to use OpenID Connect client and server library written for Go and certified by the OpenID FoundationExceptional100pingcap/tidbTiDB is built for agentic workloads that grow unpredictably, with ACID guarantees and native support for transactions, analytics, and vector search. No data silos. No noisy neighbors. No infrastructure ceiling.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.