Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 22:28 UTC

dereuromark / cakephp-geo

A CakePHP plugin around geocoding tools and helpers.

PHPMIT★ 51 stars⑂ 29 forkssince Sep 2014View on GitHub ↗

#cakephp #cakephp-plugin #php #geocoder-provider #geocoding #geocoder

dereuromark/cakephp-geo holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (94/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (45/100). It was last updated 44 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Mark SchererPersonal account

678 followers130 public repossince Dec 2008Available as (Cake)PHP expert

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	dereuromark/cakephp-geo	3.8.0	2,975	43	134 days ago	geocoding helpers plugin google-maps cakephp maps location admin-panel coordinates

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

65Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

53Moderate

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 44 days ago
15.9/36	Commit cadence — 23/52 weeks with commits
16.4/18	Commit volume — 66 commits in the last year
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

commits_last_year	66
human_commit_share	0.99
days_since_last_push	44
active_weeks_last_year	23

Release discipline

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 43 releases published
27/36	Release recency — latest release 133 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~88.4 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	43
latest_release_tag	3.8.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	133
mean_days_between_releases	88.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

55Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

44Weak

How it's scored

27.6/60	Stars — 51 stars
12.1/25	Forks — 29 forks
3.9/15	Watchers — 6 watchers

Inputs used

forks	29
stars	51
watchers	6
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	7
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	codecov.io, github.com, poser.pugx.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

50Moderate

How it's scored

46.3/80	Monthly downloads — 2,975 downloads/month across packagist
4/20	Registry dependents — 3 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	dereuromark/cakephp-geo
dependents	3
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	194,353
monthly_downloads	2,975
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

37Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.4/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 80% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 22 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	22
top_contributor_share	0.803

Issue & PR responsiveness

77Good

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
25.4/30	PR acceptance — 60/71 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	60
open_issues	0
closed_issues	34
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	11
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

69Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
20.4/25	Owner reach — 678 followers of dereuromark
25/25	Track record — 130 public repos, account ~17 yr old

Inputs used

followers	678
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	dereuromark
public_repos	130
account_age_days	6,487

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 134 days ago
20/20	Version history — 43 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	dereuromark/cakephp-geo
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	134

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

94Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — phpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://dereuromark.github.io/cakephp-geo/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 6 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	cakephp, cakephp-plugin, php, geocoder-provider, geocoding, geocoder
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://dereuromark.github.io/cakephp-geo/
docs_site	https://dereuromark.github.io/cakephp-geo/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

42Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
2.2/7.5	Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
3.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	4.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	5
affected_packages	3
assessed_packages	174
unassessed_packages	15
affected_by_severity	high 2, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 174 resolved dependencies against OSV. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

45Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

20At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
19.9/40	Legible commit history — 37 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.374
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

59Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — phpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.01
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.01

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/94 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	54,674
source_files_sampled	94
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

51GitHub stars

22contributors

66commits, last 12 months

44days since last push

43releases

1bus factor

0open issues

npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 29 ⇿

0Stars

29Forks

36Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 3Minor 12Patch 18

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10

4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 22:28 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
1	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
3	Maintained	4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
5	Vulnerabilities	5 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 1

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	cakephp/cakephp	`^5.1.1`	composer.json

All dependencies 189

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 188 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	cakephp/cakephp	`—`	direct
npm	@algolia/abtesting	`1.18.1`	indirect
npm	@algolia/autocomplete-core	`1.17.7`	indirect
npm	@algolia/autocomplete-plugin-algolia-insights	`1.17.7`	indirect
npm	@algolia/autocomplete-preset-algolia	`1.17.7`	indirect
npm	@algolia/autocomplete-shared	`1.17.7`	indirect
npm	@algolia/client-abtesting	`5.52.1`	indirect
npm	@algolia/client-analytics	`5.52.1`	indirect
npm	@algolia/client-common	`5.52.1`	indirect
npm	@algolia/client-insights	`5.52.1`	indirect
npm	@algolia/client-personalization	`5.52.1`	indirect
npm	@algolia/client-query-suggestions	`5.52.1`	indirect
npm	@algolia/client-search	`5.52.1`	indirect
npm	@algolia/ingestion	`1.52.1`	indirect
npm	@algolia/monitoring	`1.52.1`	indirect
npm	@algolia/recommend	`5.52.1`	indirect
npm	@algolia/requester-browser-xhr	`5.52.1`	indirect
npm	@algolia/requester-fetch	`5.52.1`	indirect
npm	@algolia/requester-node-http	`5.52.1`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-string-parser	`7.27.1`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.28.5`	indirect
npm	@babel/parser	`7.29.3`	indirect
npm	@babel/types	`7.29.0`	indirect
npm	@docsearch/css	`3.8.2`	indirect
npm	@docsearch/js	`3.8.2`	indirect
npm	@docsearch/react	`3.8.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@iconify-json/simple-icons	`1.2.83`	indirect
npm	@iconify/types	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x64	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm64	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/core	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/engine-javascript	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/engine-oniguruma	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/langs	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/themes	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/transformers	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/types	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/vscode-textmate	`10.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/hast	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	@types/linkify-it	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	@types/markdown-it	`14.1.2`	indirect
npm	@types/mdast	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	@types/mdurl	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	@types/unist	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	@types/web-bluetooth	`0.0.21`	indirect
npm	@ungap/structured-clone	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	@vitejs/plugin-vue	`5.2.4`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-core	`3.5.34`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-dom	`3.5.34`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-sfc	`3.5.34`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-ssr	`3.5.34`	indirect
npm	@vue/devtools-api	`7.7.9`	indirect
npm	@vue/devtools-kit	`7.7.9`	indirect
npm	@vue/devtools-shared	`7.7.9`	indirect
npm	@vue/reactivity	`3.5.34`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-core	`3.5.34`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-dom	`3.5.34`	indirect
npm	@vue/server-renderer	`3.5.34`	indirect
npm	@vue/shared	`3.5.34`	indirect
npm	@vueuse/core	`12.8.2`	indirect
npm	@vueuse/integrations	`12.8.2`	indirect
npm	@vueuse/metadata	`12.8.2`	indirect
npm	@vueuse/shared	`12.8.2`	indirect
npm	algoliasearch	`5.52.1`	indirect
npm	birpc	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	ccount	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	character-entities-html4	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	character-entities-legacy	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	comma-separated-tokens	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	copy-anything	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	csstype	`3.2.3`	indirect
npm	dequal	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	devlop	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex-xs	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	entities	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	focus-trap	`7.8.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	hast-util-to-html	`9.0.5`	indirect
npm	hast-util-whitespace	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	hookable	`5.5.3`	indirect
npm	html-void-elements	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-what	`5.5.0`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.21`	indirect
npm	mark.js	`8.11.1`	indirect
npm	mdast-util-to-hast	`13.2.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-character	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-encode	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-sanitize-uri	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-symbol	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	micromark-util-types	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	minisearch	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	mitt	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.16`	indirect
npm	oniguruma-to-es	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	perfect-debounce	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.25`	indirect
npm	preact	`10.29.2`	indirect
npm	property-information	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	regex	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	regex-recursion	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	regex-utilities	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	rfdc	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.60.4`	indirect
npm	search-insights	`2.17.3`	indirect
npm	shiki	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	space-separated-tokens	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	speakingurl	`14.0.1`	indirect
npm	stringify-entities	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	superjson	`2.2.6`	indirect
npm	tabbable	`6.4.0`	indirect
npm	trim-lines	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	unist-util-is	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	unist-util-position	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	unist-util-stringify-position	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	unist-util-visit	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	unist-util-visit-parents	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	vfile	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	vfile-message	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	vite	`5.4.21`	indirect
npm	vitepress	`1.6.4`	indirect
npm	vue	`3.5.34`	indirect
npm	zwitch	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	dereuromark/cakephp-tools	`—`	indirect
Packagist	ext-intl	`—`	indirect
Packagist	ext-json	`—`	indirect
Packagist	fig-r/psr2r-sniffer	`—`	indirect
Packagist	geocoder-php/common-http	`—`	indirect
Packagist	geocoder-php/google-maps-provider	`—`	indirect
Packagist	geocoder-php/nominatim-provider	`—`	indirect
Packagist	geocoder-php/provider-implementation	`—`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/discovery	`—`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/message	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`—`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-message	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/http-client	`—`	indirect
Packagist	willdurand/geocoder	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 174 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
nanoid	`3.3.16`	indirect	high	1	`5.1.6`
vite	`5.4.21`	indirect	high	3	`8.0.16`
esbuild	`0.21.5`	indirect	moderate	1	`0.25.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records