Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-08 22:17 UTC

devdasx / wallet-hd-derivation-kit

Offline native HD wallet derivation for Swift, JavaScript, Python, Rust, Go, Dart, Kotlin, and the wallethd CLI

Rust · Swift · JavaScriptMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jul 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

devdasx/wallet-hd-derivation-kit holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (90/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (29/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ThuglifePersonal account
3 followers30 public repossince Dec 2024

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Gogithub.com/devdasx/wallet-hd-derivation-kitv1.0.0-157 days ago—
crates.iowallet-hd-derivation-kit1.0.06157 days agobitcoinbip32hd-walletxpubsolanacommand-line-utilitiescryptography
PyPIwallet-hd-derivation-kit1.0.026157 days agobip32bip39cryptocurrencyhd-walletxpub

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

62Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
10.8/18Commit volume — 15 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year15
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year1
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 1 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 57 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 1 out of the last 1 releases have a total of 1 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv1.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release57
mean_days_between_releases—

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

39Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges17
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesapi.securityscorecards.dev, github.com, jitpack.io, pkg.go.dev, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
20.2/80Monthly downloads — 32 downloads/month across crates, go, pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/devdasx/wallet-hd-derivation-kit, wallet-hd-derivation-kit, wallet-hd-derivation-kit
dependents—
ecosystemscrates, go, pypi
total_downloads19
monthly_downloads32
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

29At Risk · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — 0/11 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs11
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
4.3/25Owner reach — 3 followers of devdasx
14.3/25Track record — 30 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers3
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logindevdasx
public_repos30
account_age_days624
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on crates, go, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 57 days ago
4/20Version history — 1 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/devdasx/wallet-hd-derivation-kit, wallet-hd-derivation-kit, wallet-hd-derivation-kit
ecosystemscrates, go, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish57

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://devdasx.github.io/wallet-hd-derivation-kit/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 16 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsbip32, bip39, bitcoin, cryptocurrency, dart, ethereum, golang, hd-wallet, kotlin, offline-first, python, rust, solana, swift-package, typescript, wallet
has_wikino
homepagehttps://devdasx.github.io/wallet-hd-derivation-kit/
docs_sitehttps://devdasx.github.io/wallet-hd-derivation-kit/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

79Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
5/5SAST — SAST tool detected: CodeQL
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 1 out of the last 1 releases have a total of 1 signed artifacts.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate7.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages1
assessed_packages178
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 178 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

90Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes727
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, build.gradle.kts, examples/go/go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, go.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, build.gradle.kts, examples/go/go.mod, examples/kotlin/build.gradle.kts, examples/rust/Cargo.toml, fuzz/Cargo.toml, go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/52 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes48,639
source_files_sampled52
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
15commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, Go, Maven, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch npm package 'wallet-hd-derivation-kit' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.4 / 10
7.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-08 22:17 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
8Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
10SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
8Signed-Releases1 out of the last 1 releases have a total of 1 signed artifacts.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 29
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iobip39=2.2.2Cargo.toml
crates.iobs58=0.5.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap=4.6.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap_complete=4.6.7Cargo.toml
crates.ioed25519-dalek=2.2.0Cargo.toml
crates.iohex=0.4.3Cargo.toml
crates.iohmac=0.12.1Cargo.toml
crates.iok256=0.13.4Cargo.toml
crates.ioripemd=0.1.3Cargo.toml
crates.iorpassword=7.5.4Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde=1.0.228Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json=1.0.150Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2=0.10.9Cargo.toml
crates.iosha3=0.10.9Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror=2.0.18Cargo.toml
crates.iozeroize=1.9.0Cargo.toml
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btcd/btcec/v2v2.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/crypto/ripemd160v1.0.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/devdasx/bip39-mnemonic-kit/v2v2.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/filecoin-project/go-keccakv0.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/mr-tron/base58v1.3.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0go.mod
npm@noble/curves2.0.1package.json
npm@noble/hashes2.2.0package.json
npm@scure/bip392.0.1package.json
PyPIcoincurve==21.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPImnemonic==0.21pyproject.toml
PyPIPyNaCl==1.6.2pyproject.toml
PyPIpycryptodome==3.23.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 178

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 30 direct and 148 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iobip392.2.2direct
crates.iobs580.5.1direct
crates.ioclap4.6.1direct
crates.ioclap_complete4.6.7direct
crates.ioed25519-dalek2.2.0direct
crates.iohex0.4.3direct
crates.iohmac0.12.1direct
crates.iok2560.13.4direct
crates.ioripemd0.1.3direct
crates.iorpassword7.5.4direct
crates.ioserde1.0.228direct
crates.ioserde_json1.0.150direct
crates.iosha20.10.9direct
crates.iosha30.10.9direct
crates.iothiserror2.0.18direct
crates.iozeroize1.9.0direct
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btcd/btcec/v2v2.5.0direct
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/crypto/ripemd160v1.0.2direct
Gogithub.com/devdasx/bip39-mnemonic-kit/v2v2.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/filecoin-project/go-keccakv0.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/mr-tron/base58v1.3.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0direct
npm@noble/curves2.0.1direct
npm@noble/hashes2.0.1direct
npm@noble/hashes2.2.0direct
npm@scure/bip392.0.1direct
PyPIcoincurve21.0.0direct
PyPImnemonic0.21direct
PyPIpycryptodome3.23.0direct
PyPIpynacl1.6.2direct
crates.ioanstream1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.14indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle-query1.1.5indirect
crates.ioanstyle-wincon3.0.11indirect
crates.ioarbitrary1.4.2indirect
crates.ioarrayvec0.7.8indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.iobase16ct0.2.0indirect
crates.iobase64ct1.8.3indirect
crates.iobit-set0.8.0indirect
crates.iobit-vec0.8.0indirect
crates.iobitcoin_hashes0.14.101indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.0indirect
crates.ioblock-buffer0.10.4indirect
crates.iocc1.2.67indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.6.0indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.6.1indirect
crates.ioclap_lex1.1.0indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.5indirect
crates.ioconst-oid0.9.6indirect
crates.iocpufeatures0.2.17indirect
crates.iocrypto-bigint0.5.5indirect
crates.iocrypto-common0.1.6indirect
crates.iocurve25519-dalek4.1.3indirect
crates.iocurve25519-dalek-derive0.1.1indirect
crates.ioder0.7.10indirect
crates.iodigest0.10.7indirect
crates.ioecdsa0.16.9indirect
crates.ioed255192.2.3indirect
crates.ioelliptic-curve0.13.8indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.iofastrand2.4.1indirect
crates.ioff0.13.1indirect
crates.iofiat-crypto0.2.9indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.9indirect
crates.iofnv1.0.7indirect
crates.iogeneric-array0.14.9indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.2.17indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.3.4indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.iogroup0.13.0indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.iohex-conservative0.2.2indirect
crates.iois_terminal_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iojobserver0.1.35indirect
crates.iokeccak0.1.6indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.186indirect
crates.iolibfuzzer-sys0.4.13indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.12.1indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.3indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.ioonce_cell_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.iopkcs80.10.2indirect
crates.ioppv-lite860.2.21indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.ioproptest1.11.0indirect
crates.ioquick-error1.2.3indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.46indirect
crates.ior-efi5.3.0indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.iorand0.9.5indirect
crates.iorand_chacha0.9.0indirect
crates.iorand_core0.6.4indirect
crates.iorand_core0.9.5indirect
crates.iorand_xorshift0.4.0indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.iorfc69790.4.0indirect
crates.iortoolbox0.0.5indirect
crates.iorustc_version0.4.1indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.4indirect
crates.iorusty-fork0.3.1indirect
crates.iosec10.7.3indirect
crates.iosemver1.0.28indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioshlex2.0.1indirect
crates.iosignature2.2.0indirect
crates.iospki0.7.3indirect
crates.iostrsim0.11.1indirect
crates.iosubtle2.6.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.118indirect
crates.iotempfile3.27.0indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.18indirect
crates.iotinyvec1.12.0indirect
crates.iotinyvec_macros0.1.1indirect
crates.iotypenum1.20.1indirect
crates.iounarray0.1.4indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iounicode-normalization0.1.25indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.2indirect
crates.ioversion_check0.9.5indirect
crates.iowait-timeout0.2.1indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.4+wasi-0.2.12indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.59.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.57.1indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.54indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.54indirect
crates.iozeroize_derive1.5.0indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.22indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/dcrec/secp256k1/v4v4.4.0indirect
npm@gerrit0/mini-shiki3.23.0indirect
npm@scure/base2.0.0indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-oniguruma3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/langs3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/themes3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/types3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/vscode-textmate10.0.2indirect
npm@types/hast3.0.5indirect
npm@types/unist3.0.3indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.7indirect
npmentities4.5.0indirect
npmjsr0.14.3indirect
npmlinkify-it5.0.2indirect
npmlunr2.3.9indirect
npmmarkdown-it14.3.0indirect
npmmdurl2.0.0indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmnode-stream-zip1.15.0indirect
npmpunycode.js2.3.1indirect
npmsemiver1.1.0indirect
npmtypedoc0.28.20indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmuc.micro2.1.0indirect
npmyaml2.9.0indirect
PyPIbuild1.3.0indirect
PyPIhatchling1.27.0indirect
PyPImypy1.19.1indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.0.0indirect
PyPIruff0.14.10indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 178 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
brace-expansion5.0.7indirecthigh25.0.9

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go, crates.io, PyPI.