Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 14:08 UTC

devlead / Devlead.Console.Template

@devlead .NET Console Template

C#MIT★ 37 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Jan 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryPluginhow this is determined

devlead/Devlead.Console.Template holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Security (21/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Mattias KarlssonPersonal account
200 followers382 public repossince Apr 2012@WCOMAB

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetDevlead.Console.Template2026.9.9.686-446 days agoconsoletemplate

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
30.5/36Commit cadence44/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume343 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedno data
Inputs used
commits_last_year343
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year44

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases43 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 6 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~26.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count43
latest_release_tag2026.9.9.686
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases26.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/60Stars37 stars
0/25Forks2 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars37
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
46.9/80Total downloads32,847 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesDevlead.Console.Template
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads32,847
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 70% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsno data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.705
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
28.7/30PR acceptance272/284 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewno data
Inputs used
merged_prs272
open_issues0
closed_issues2
prs_merged_7d11
prs_decided_7d12
prs_merged_30d15
prs_decided_30d17
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs12
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
16.6/25Owner reach200 followers of devlead
25/25Track record382 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers200
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_logindevlead
public_repos382
account_age_days5,265
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 6 days ago
20/20Version history44 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesDevlead.Console.Template
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish6

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

48Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.devlead.se/posts/2021/2021-01-15-my-preferred-console-stack
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdotnet, dotnet-core, csharp, template, template-proejct
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.devlead.se/posts/2021/2021-01-15-my-preferred-console-stack
docs_sitehttps://www.devlead.se/posts/2021/2021-01-15-my-preferred-console-stack
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

21At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfilesno dependency manifests — not applicable
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfiles
manifests
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages12
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 12 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

44Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history94 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.94
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/Devlead.Console.Template/Devlead.Console.Template.csproj, src/Devlead.Console.Template/DevleadConsole.Tests/DevleadConsole.Tests.csproj, src/Devlead.Console.Template/DevleadConsole/DevleadConsole.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/Devlead.Console.Template/Devlead.Console.Template.csproj, src/Devlead.Console.Template/DevleadConsole.Tests/DevleadConsole.Tests.csproj, src/Devlead.Console.Template/DevleadConsole/DevleadConsole.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/7 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes11,037
source_files_sampled7
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

37GitHub stars
2contributors
343commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
43releases
1bus factor
0open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (exit code 0; Skipping github.com/devlead/Devlead.Console.Template: run: internal error: ListCommits:error during graphqlHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Something went wrong while executing your query on 2026-09-15T14:08:43Z. Please include `CE3A:1A3A0E:AAC4412:A69053E:6AA9516A` when reporting this issue.); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks
1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212021-112022-012022-03
Major 0Minor 1Patch 0
All dependencies 12

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 12 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1indirect
NuGetDevlead.Console2026.9.9.890indirect
NuGetDevlead.Testing.MockHttp2026.9.9.935indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.Testing10.10.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.Testing8.10.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.Testing9.10.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.10.0indirect
NuGetNUnit4.6.1indirect
NuGetNUnit.Analyzers4.15.0indirect
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter6.3.0indirect
NuGetSpectre.Console.Testing0.57.2indirect
NuGetVerify.NUnit33.0.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 12 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.