Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 05:21 UTC

devlooped / ThisAssembly

Expose project and assembly level information as constants in the ThisAssembly class using source generators powered by Roslyn.

C#MIT★ 532 stars⑂ 23 forkssince Sep 2020View on GitHub ↗

devlooped/ThisAssembly holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (76/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (55/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

devloopedOrganization · verified domain
138 followers113 public repossince Feb 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetThisAssembly2.1.4-460 days agodotnetroslyn
NuGetThisAssembly.Git2.1.4-220 days agodotnetroslyn
NuGetThisAssembly.Vsix2.1.4-170 days agodotnetroslynvsix
NuGetThisAssembly.Project2.1.4-330 days agodotnetroslyn
NuGetThisAssembly.Strings2.1.4-390 days agodotnetroslyn
NuGetThisAssembly.Metadata2.1.4-400 days agodotnetroslyn
NuGetThisAssembly.Constants2.1.4-370 days agodotnetroslyn
NuGetThisAssembly.Resources2.1.4-240 days agodotnetroslyn

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

76Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence10/52 weeks with commits
13.6/18Commit volume32 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained15 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year32
human_commit_share0.83
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year10
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases68 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~54.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count68
latest_release_tagv2.1.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases54.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

75Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
44.2/60Stars532 stars
11.2/25Forks23 forks
3.3/15Watchers5 watchers
Inputs used
forks23
stars532
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges22
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
69.8/80Total downloads5,225,181 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesThisAssembly, ThisAssembly.Git, ThisAssembly.Vsix, ThisAssembly.Project, ThisAssembly.Strings, ThisAssembly.Metadata, ThisAssembly.Constants, ThisAssembly.Resources
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads5,225,181
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 63% of commits
10.8/13.5Contributor breadth8 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled8
top_contributor_share0.633
How it's scored
41.3/42Issue resolution98% of issues closed
22.8/30PR acceptance332/437 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs332
open_issues1
closed_issues61
prs_merged_7d3
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio0.984
closed_unmerged_prs105
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
15.4/25Owner reach138 followers of devlooped
25/25Track record113 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers138
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logindevlooped
public_repos113
account_age_days2,372

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable8 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history46 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesThisAssembly, ThisAssembly.Git, ThisAssembly.Vsix, ThisAssembly.Project, ThisAssembly.Strings, ThisAssembly.Metadata, ThisAssembly.Constants, ThisAssembly.Resources
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows9 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://clarius.org/ThisAssembly
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscsharp-sourcegenerator, roslyn
has_wikino
homepagehttps://clarius.org/ThisAssembly
docs_sitehttps://clarius.org/ThisAssembly
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

71Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained15 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages11
unassessed_packages1
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 11 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
17.3/40Legible commit history27 of 83 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.325
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,203
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/ThisAssembly.AssemblyInfo/ThisAssembly.AssemblyInfo.csproj, src/ThisAssembly.Constants/ThisAssembly.Constants.csproj, src/ThisAssembly.Git/ThisAssembly.Git.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance17 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/ThisAssembly.AssemblyInfo/ThisAssembly.AssemblyInfo.csproj, src/ThisAssembly.Constants/ThisAssembly.Constants.csproj, src/ThisAssembly.Git/ThisAssembly.Git.csproj, src/ThisAssembly.Metadata/ThisAssembly.Metadata.csproj, src/ThisAssembly.Project/ThisAssembly.Project.csproj, src/ThisAssembly.Resources/ThisAssembly.Resources.csproj, src/ThisAssembly.Strings/ThisAssembly.Strings.csproj, src/ThisAssembly.Tests/ThisAssembly.Tests.csproj, src/ThisAssembly.Vsix/ThisAssembly.Vsix.csproj, src/ThisAssembly/ThisAssembly.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.17
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/14 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes6,756
source_files_sampled14
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

532GitHub stars
8contributors
32commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
68releases
1bus factor
1open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 23 ⇿
0Stars
23Forks
56Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

048121620242312020-112023-092026-06
Major 1Minor 5Patch 44

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 05:21 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained15 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 33
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsgithub-pages~> 231Gemfile
NuGetNuGetizer1.4.7src/ThisAssembly.AssemblyInfo/ThisAssembly.AssemblyInfo.csproj
NuGetNuGetizer1.4.7src/ThisAssembly.Constants/ThisAssembly.Constants.csproj
NuGetScriban7.2.2src/ThisAssembly.Constants/ThisAssembly.Constants.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CSharp4.7.0src/ThisAssembly.Constants/ThisAssembly.Constants.csproj
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.6.3src/ThisAssembly.Constants/ThisAssembly.Constants.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.0.1src/ThisAssembly.Constants/ThisAssembly.Constants.csproj
NuGetPolySharp1.15.0src/ThisAssembly.Constants/ThisAssembly.Constants.csproj
NuGetNuGetizer1.4.7src/ThisAssembly.Git/ThisAssembly.Git.csproj
NuGetNuGetizer1.4.7src/ThisAssembly.Metadata/ThisAssembly.Metadata.csproj
NuGetNuGetizer1.4.7src/ThisAssembly.Project/ThisAssembly.Project.csproj
NuGetNuGetizer1.4.7src/ThisAssembly.Resources/ThisAssembly.Resources.csproj
NuGetScriban7.2.2src/ThisAssembly.Resources/ThisAssembly.Resources.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CSharp4.7.0src/ThisAssembly.Resources/ThisAssembly.Resources.csproj
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.6.3src/ThisAssembly.Resources/ThisAssembly.Resources.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.0.1src/ThisAssembly.Resources/ThisAssembly.Resources.csproj
NuGetPolySharp1.15.0src/ThisAssembly.Resources/ThisAssembly.Resources.csproj
NuGetNuGetizer1.4.7src/ThisAssembly.Strings/ThisAssembly.Strings.csproj
NuGetScriban7.2.2src/ThisAssembly.Strings/ThisAssembly.Strings.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CSharp4.7.0src/ThisAssembly.Strings/ThisAssembly.Strings.csproj
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.6.3src/ThisAssembly.Strings/ThisAssembly.Strings.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.0.1src/ThisAssembly.Strings/ThisAssembly.Strings.csproj
NuGetPolySharp1.15.0src/ThisAssembly.Strings/ThisAssembly.Strings.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.400src/ThisAssembly.Tests/ThisAssembly.Tests.csproj
NuGetPolySharp1.15.0src/ThisAssembly.Tests/ThisAssembly.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.0.1src/ThisAssembly.Tests/ThisAssembly.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.9.0src/ThisAssembly.Tests/ThisAssembly.Tests.csproj
NuGetScriban7.2.2src/ThisAssembly.Tests/ThisAssembly.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3src/ThisAssembly.Tests/ThisAssembly.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio4.0.0src/ThisAssembly.Tests/ThisAssembly.Tests.csproj
NuGetNuGetizer1.4.7src/ThisAssembly.Vsix/ThisAssembly.Vsix.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.VSSDK.BuildTools18.5.40034src/ThisAssembly.Vsix/ThisAssembly.Vsix.csproj
NuGetNuGetizer1.4.7src/ThisAssembly/ThisAssembly.csproj
All dependencies 12

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.0.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CSharp4.7.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.9.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.400direct
NuGetMicrosoft.VSSDK.BuildTools18.5.40034direct
NuGetNuGetizer1.4.7direct
NuGetPolySharp1.15.0direct
NuGetScriban7.2.2direct
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.6.3direct
NuGetxunit2.9.3direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio4.0.0direct
RubyGemsgithub-pagesdirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 11 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.