Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 23:47 UTC

dgtlss / warden

A Laravel package that proactively monitors your dependencies for security vulnerabilities by running automated composer audits and sending notifications via webhooks and email

PHPMIT★ 97 stars⑂ 10 forkssince Nov 2024View on GitHub ↗

dgtlss/warden holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (77/100) and lowest on Security (46/100). It was last updated 53 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Nathan LangerPersonal account
18 followers21 public repossince Oct 2017@wearemotion

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistdgtlss/wardenv2.0.07,1002153 days agosecuritycomposernotificationscilaravelauditsvulnerabilitiessupply-chaincvesastsecret-scanning

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

66Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 53 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence8/52 weeks with commits
16.5/18Commit volume67 commits in the last year
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
commits_last_year67
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push53
active_weeks_last_year8

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases23 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 53 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~38.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count23
latest_release_tagv2.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release53
mean_days_between_releases38.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

53Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
32.2/60Stars97 stars
8/25Forks10 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks10
stars97
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
51.4/80Monthly downloads7,100 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesdgtlss/warden
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads75,208
monthly_downloads7,100
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 48% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth5 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.477
How it's scored
30.5/42Issue resolution73% of issues closed
28.1/30PR acceptance15/16 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 2/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs15
open_issues3
closed_issues8
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.727
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
9.2/25Owner reach18 followers of dgtlss
21.8/25Track record21 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers18
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_logindgtlss
public_repos21
account_age_days3,258
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 53 days ago
20/20Version history21 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdgtlss/warden
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish53

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configphpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
8/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests3 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics14 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscve, laravel, laravel-framework, laravel-package, laravel-security, laravel-security-checker, php, php8, security, security-tools, vulnerabilities, vulnerability, vulnerability-scanners, warden
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1/2.5CI-Tests3 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 2/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3/7.5Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities16 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
14.8/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: guzzlehttp/guzzle 7.14.0 (high 7.2)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories16
affected_packages2
assessed_packages119
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 119 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.cursor/rules/snyk_rules.mdc, AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
31.5/40Legible commit history59 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.59
agent_instruction_files.cursor/rules/snyk_rules.mdc, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes1,884
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configphpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/71 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes27,285
source_files_sampled71
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

97GitHub stars
5contributors
67commits, last 12 months
53days since last push
23releases
2bus factor
3open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 10 ⇿
0Stars
10Forks
17Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468101012024-112025-072026-03
Major 0Minor 5Patch 12

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10
3.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 23:47 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
4CI-Tests3 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 2/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
4Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities16 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistilluminate/console^12.0|^13.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/contracts^12.0|^13.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/encryption^12.0|^13.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/http^12.0|^13.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/support^12.0|^13.0composer.json
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle^7.0composer.json
Packagistnikic/php-parser^5.8composer.json
Packagistsymfony/finder^7.2|^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/process^7.2|^8.0composer.json
All dependencies 119

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 115 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.14.0direct
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.8.0direct
Packagistsymfony/finder8.1.1direct
Packagistsymfony/process8.1.0direct
Packagistbrick/math0.18.0indirect
Packagistcarbonphp/carbon-doctrine-types3.2.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.4indirect
Packagistdflydev/dot-access-data3.0.3indirect
Packagistdoctrine/inflector2.1.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer3.0.1indirect
Packagistdragonmantank/cron-expression3.6.0indirect
Packagistegulias/email-validator4.0.4indirect
Packagistfakerphp/faker1.24.1indirect
Packagistfilp/whoops2.18.4indirect
Packagistfruitcake/php-cors1.4.0indirect
Packagistgraham-campbell/result-type1.1.4indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises2.5.1indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.12.4indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/uri-template1.0.9indirect
Packagisthamcrest/hamcrest-php2.1.1indirect
Packagistiamcal/sql-parser0.7indirect
Packagistlarastan/larastan3.10.0indirect
Packagistlaravel/framework13.19.0indirect
Packagistlaravel/pail1.2.7indirect
Packagistlaravel/prompts0.3.21indirect
Packagistlaravel/serializable-closure2.0.13indirect
Packagistlaravel/tinker3.0.2indirect
Packagistleague/commonmark2.8.2indirect
Packagistleague/config1.2.0indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem3.35.2indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem-local3.31.0indirect
Packagistleague/mime-type-detection1.17.0indirect
Packagistleague/uri7.8.1indirect
Packagistleague/uri-interfaces7.8.1indirect
Packagistmockery/mockery1.6.12indirect
Packagistmonolog/monolog3.10.0indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.13.4indirect
Packagistnesbot/carbon3.13.1indirect
Packagistnette/schema1.3.5indirect
Packagistnette/utils4.1.4indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/collision8.9.4indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/termwind2.4.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/canvas11.0.1indirect
Packagistorchestra/canvas-core11.0.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/sidekick1.2.20indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench11.1.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench-core11.3.5indirect
Packagistorchestra/workbench11.1.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpoption/phpoption1.9.5indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.2.5indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage12.5.7indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator6.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker6.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template5.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer8.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit12.5.31indirect
Packagistpsr/clock1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.3indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/simple-cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistpsy/psysh0.12.24indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistramsey/collection2.1.1indirect
Packagistramsey/uuid4.9.3indirect
Packagistrector/rector2.5.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser4.2.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator7.1.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff7.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment8.1.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter7.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state8.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator7.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context7.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/type6.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/version6.0.0indirect
Packagiststaabm/side-effects-detector1.0.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/clock8.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/console8.1.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selector8.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/error-handler8.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher8.1.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation8.1.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel8.1.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/mailer8.1.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/mime8.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-idn1.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.38.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.38.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php831.38.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php841.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php851.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php861.38.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-uuid1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/routing8.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/string8.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation8.1.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/uid8.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper8.1.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml8.1.1indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer2.0.1indirect
Packagisttijsverkoyen/css-to-inline-styles2.4.0indirect
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv5.6.4indirect
Packagistvoku/portable-ascii2.1.1indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 119 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
guzzlehttp/guzzle7.14.0directhigh68.0.1
league/commonmark2.8.2indirecthigh102.10.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.