Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 17:07 UTC

dimforge / bevy_rapier

Official Rapier plugin for the Bevy game engine.

RustApache-2.0★ 1,582 stars⑂ 282 forkssince Aug 2020View on GitHub ↗

dimforge/bevy_rapier holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (72/100) and lowest on Security (47/100). It was last updated 13 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

dimforgeOrganization
561 followers37 public repossince Sep 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iocipoints to another repo — not scored0.1.0197168 days agobinaryclicodeownersgittooling
crates.iobevy_rapier2d0.36.014,3124913 days agodynamicsjointsphysicsreal-timerigid
crates.iobevy_rapier3d0.36.019,8854913 days agodynamicsjointsphysicsreal-timerigid

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

60Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 13 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence5/52 weeks with commits
10.6/18Commit volume14 commits in the last year
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
commits_last_year14
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push13
active_weeks_last_year5
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases42 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 13 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~86.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count42
latest_release_tagv0.36.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release13
mean_days_between_releases86.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
51.9/60Stars1,582 stars
20.4/25Forks282 forks
5.6/15Watchers11 watchers
Inputs used
forks282
stars1,582
watchers11
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
60.5/80Monthly downloads34,197 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesbevy_rapier2d, bevy_rapier3d
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads1,057,683
monthly_downloads34,197
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 42% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth69 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled69
top_contributor_share0.415
How it's scored
25/42Issue resolution60% of issues closed
23.7/30PR acceptance253/320 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 8/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs253
open_issues127
closed_issues187
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.596
closed_unmerged_prs67
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
19.8/25Owner reach561 followers of dimforge
23.5/25Track record37 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers561
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logindimforge
public_repos37
account_age_days2,898

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 13 days ago
20/20Version history49 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesbevy_rapier2d, bevy_rapier3d
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish13

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
16/16Linter configbevy_rapier2d/Cargo.toml ([lints]), bevy_rapier3d/Cargo.toml ([lints]), rustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests11 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://rapier.rs
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://rapier.rs
docs_sitehttps://rapier.rs
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.2/2.5CI-Tests11 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 8/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3/7.5Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
23.5/40Legible commit history44 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.44
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml, bevy_rapier2d/Cargo.toml, bevy_rapier3d/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configbevy_rapier2d/Cargo.toml ([lints]), bevy_rapier3d/Cargo.toml ([lints]), rustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, bevy_rapier2d/Cargo.toml, bevy_rapier3d/Cargo.toml, bevy_rapier_benches3d/Cargo.toml, ci/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/105 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes38,931
source_files_sampled105
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,582GitHub stars
69contributors
14commits, last 12 months
13days since last push
42releases
2bus factor
127open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • crates package 'ci' points at a different repository (https://github.com/code-input/cli); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch crates package 'bevy_rapier_benches3d' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 282 ⇿
0Stars
282Forks
40Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

05010015020025030026742020-082023-082026-08
Major 0Minor 29Patch 10

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10
4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 17:06 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
5CI-Tests11 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 8/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
4Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 18
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iobevy0.19.0bevy_rapier2d/Cargo.toml
crates.ionalgebra0.34.2bevy_rapier2d/Cargo.toml
crates.iorapier2dbevy_rapier2d/Cargo.toml
crates.iobitflags2.10.0bevy_rapier2d/Cargo.toml
crates.iolog0.4bevy_rapier2d/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1bevy_rapier2d/Cargo.toml
crates.iobevy0.19.0bevy_rapier3d/Cargo.toml
crates.ionalgebra0.34.2bevy_rapier3d/Cargo.toml
crates.iorapier3dbevy_rapier3d/Cargo.toml
crates.iobitflags2.10.0bevy_rapier3d/Cargo.toml
crates.iolog0.4bevy_rapier3d/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1bevy_rapier3d/Cargo.toml
crates.iorapier3dbevy_rapier_benches3d/Cargo.toml
crates.iobevy_rapier3d0.36bevy_rapier_benches3d/Cargo.toml
crates.iobevy0.19.0bevy_rapier_benches3d/Cargo.toml
crates.iobevy0.19.0ci/Cargo.toml
crates.iobevy_rapier3d0.36ci/Cargo.toml
crates.iobevy_rapier2d0.36ci/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.