ding113/claude-code-hub holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Security (52/100). It was last updated 17 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
89
overall / 100
Excellent
Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: next 16.3.3 (critical 9.8)
0/25
Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40
No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
source
osv
advisories
7
affected_packages
1
assessed_packages
6
unassessed_packages
92
affected_by_severity
critical 1
direct_affected_packages
1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 6 resolved dependencies against OSV. 92 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20
MCP server
0/40
Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
—
has_mcp_signal
yes
api_schema_files
—
interfaces_expected_of
—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
3,397GitHub stars
58contributors
2,650commits, last 12 months
17days since last push
50releases
1bus factor
22open issues
npmpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
More detail
Star and fork history 0 ★ / 395 ⇿
0Stars
395Forks
50Releases
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
Major 0Minor 2Patch 47
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-18 20:11 UTC
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 77 direct and 21 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
Registry
Package
Version
Relation
npm
@bull-board/api
^8.5.0
direct
npm
@bull-board/express
^8.5.0
direct
npm
@dnd-kit/core
^6.3.1
direct
npm
@dnd-kit/sortable
^10.0.0
direct
npm
@dnd-kit/utilities
^3.2.2
direct
npm
@hono/swagger-ui
^0.6.1
direct
npm
@hono/zod-openapi
^1.5.1
direct
npm
@hookform/resolvers
^5.6.0
direct
npm
@iarna/toml
^2.2.5
direct
npm
@langfuse/client
^5.10.0
direct
npm
@langfuse/otel
^5.10.0
direct
npm
@langfuse/tracing
^5.10.0
direct
npm
@lobehub/icons
^5.15.0
direct
npm
@lobehub/ui
5.32.5
direct
npm
@opentelemetry/sdk-node
^0.221.0
direct
npm
@radix-ui/react-alert-dialog
^1.1.23
direct
npm
@radix-ui/react-avatar
^1.2.6
direct
npm
@radix-ui/react-checkbox
^1.3.11
direct
npm
@radix-ui/react-collapsible
^1.1.20
direct
npm
@radix-ui/react-dialog
^1.1.23
direct
npm
@radix-ui/react-dropdown-menu
^2.1.24
direct
npm
@radix-ui/react-label
^2.1.15
direct
npm
@radix-ui/react-popover
^1.1.23
direct
npm
@radix-ui/react-progress
^1.1.16
direct
npm
@radix-ui/react-scroll-area
^1.2.18
direct
npm
@radix-ui/react-select
^2.3.7
direct
npm
@radix-ui/react-slider
^1.4.7
direct
npm
@radix-ui/react-slot
^1.3.3
direct
npm
@radix-ui/react-switch
^1.3.7
direct
npm
@radix-ui/react-tabs
^1.1.21
direct
npm
@radix-ui/react-tooltip
^1.2.16
direct
npm
@scalar/hono-api-reference
^0.11.12
direct
npm
@tanstack/react-query
^5.101.4
direct
npm
@tanstack/react-virtual
^3.14.9
direct
npm
@tanstack/virtual-core
^3.17.7
direct
npm
agentation
^3.0.2
direct
npm
antd
~6.5.3
direct
npm
bull
^4.16.5
direct
npm
class-variance-authority
^0.7.1
direct
npm
clsx
^2.1.1
direct
npm
cmdk
^1.1.1
direct
npm
date-fns
4.4.0
direct
npm
date-fns-tz
^3.2.0
direct
npm
decimal.js-light
^2.5.1
direct
npm
dotenv
^17.4.2
direct
npm
drizzle-orm
^0.45.2
direct
npm
fetch-socks
^1.3.3
direct
npm
fflate
^0.8.3
direct
npm
framer-motion
^12.43.0
direct
npm
hono
^4.12.33
direct
npm
html2canvas
^1.4.1
direct
npm
ioredis
^6.0.0
direct
npm
jspdf
^4.2.1
direct
npm
lucide-react
^1.28.0
direct
npm
maplibre-gl
^6.1.0
direct
npm
next
16.3.3
direct
npm
next-intl
^4.13.4
direct
npm
next-themes
^0.4.6
direct
npm
pino
^10.3.1
direct
npm
pino-pretty
^13.1.3
direct
npm
postgres
^3.4.9
direct
npm
react
^19.2.8
direct
npm
react-day-picker
^10.0.1
direct
npm
react-dom
^19.2.8
direct
npm
react-hook-form
^7.84.0
direct
npm
react-syntax-highlighter
^16.1.1
direct
npm
recharts
^3.10.1
direct
npm
safe-regex
^2.1.1
direct
npm
server-only
^0.0.1
direct
npm
sonner
^2.0.7
direct
npm
tailwind-merge
^3.6.0
direct
npm
timeago.js
^4.0.2
direct
npm
tw-animate-css
^1.4.0
direct
npm
undici
^8.9.0
direct
npm
vaul
^1.1.2
direct
npm
ws
^8.21.1
direct
npm
zod
^4.4.3
direct
npm
@biomejs/biome
^2.5.6
indirect
npm
@tailwindcss/postcss
^4.3.3
indirect
npm
@types/geojson
^7946.0.16
indirect
npm
@types/ioredis
^5.0.0
indirect
npm
@types/node
^26.1.2
indirect
npm
@types/pg
^8.20.3
indirect
npm
@types/react
^19.2.18
indirect
npm
@types/react-dom
^19.2.4
indirect
npm
@types/react-syntax-highlighter
^15.5.13
indirect
npm
@types/ws
^8.18.1
indirect
npm
@typescript/native-preview
7.0.0-dev.20260707.2
indirect
npm
@vitest/coverage-v8
^4.1.10
indirect
npm
@vitest/ui
^4.1.10
indirect
npm
bun-types
^1.3.14
indirect
npm
drizzle-kit
^0.31.10
indirect
npm
happy-dom
^20.11.1
indirect
npm
openapi-typescript
^7.13.0
indirect
npm
tailwindcss
^4.3.3
indirect
npm
typescript
6.0.2
indirect
npm
typescript
7.0.2
indirect
npm
vitest
^4.1.10
indirect
Dependency advisories 1
This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 6 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 92 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.
Package
Version
Relation
Severity
Advisories
Fixed in
next
16.3.3
direct
critical
7
16.3.8
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Related records
Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ding113/claude-code-hub. Read them side by side →
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
