Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 02:06 UTC

django-commons / django-debug-toolbar

A configurable set of panels that display various debug information about the current request/response.

PythonBSD-3-Clause★ 8,378 stars⑂ 1,102 forkssince Aug 2008View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

django-commons/django-debug-toolbar holds a health index of 99 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (62/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

99
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

99
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 90 is calibrated to 99 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Django CommonsOrganization · verified domain
392 followers23 public repossince Mar 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIdjango-debug-toolbar7.1.19,292,8218213 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
28.4/36Commit cadence — 41/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 178 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year178
human_commit_share0.53
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year41
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 35 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 13 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~64.2 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count35
latest_release_tag7.1.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release13
mean_days_between_releases64.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

96Exceptional · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 8,378 stars
25/25Forks — 1,102 forks
11.2/15Watchers — 103 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,102
stars8,378
watchers103
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 9,292,821 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdjango-debug-toolbar
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads9,292,821
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

87Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
43.2/54Bus factor — 4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 18% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 119 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor4
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.185
How it's scored
39.3/42Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
23.5/30PR acceptance — 1,087/1,386 decided PRs merged
6.5/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 3/6 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 9/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs1,087
open_issues66
closed_issues966
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d11
prs_decided_30d15
issue_closed_ratio0.936
closed_unmerged_prs299
first_time_authors_30d6
first_time_prs_merged_30d3
first_time_prs_decided_30d6
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
18.7/25Owner reach — 392 followers of django-commons
15/25Track record — 23 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers392
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logindjango-commons
public_repos23
account_age_days908

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 13 days ago
20/20Version history — 82 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdjango-debug-toolbar
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish13

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — biome.json, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), tox.ini
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 21 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://django-debug-toolbar.readthedocs.io
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://django-debug-toolbar.readthedocs.io
docs_sitehttps://django-debug-toolbar.readthedocs.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

84Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

80Excellent
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 21 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 9/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 119 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate8

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages3
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:django-debug-toolbar@7.1.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 3 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
32.2/40Legible commit history — 32 of 53 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.604
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — biome.json, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), tox.ini
11/11Static type checking — debug_toolbar/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 26 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, docs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsdebug_toolbar/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.26
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (debug_toolbar/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/117 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes43,651
source_files_sampled117
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

8,378GitHub stars
98contributors
178commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
35releases
4bus factor
66open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-07-19: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 8378 stars today.
  • Could not fetch npm package 'django-debug-toolbar' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 8,374 ★ / 1,102 ⇿
8,374Stars
1,102Forks
35Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-19. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

02,0004,0006,0008,00010,0008,374994302008-082017-082026-08
Major 4Minor 6Patch 12

Each point covers 17 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.0 / 10
8.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 02:06 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests21 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 9/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 119 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIdjango>=5.2pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlparse>=0.2pyproject.toml
All dependencies 140

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 138 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIdjango—direct
PyPIsqlparse—direct
npm@babel/code-frame7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/compat-data7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/core7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/generator7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-compilation-targets7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-globals7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-module-imports7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-module-transforms7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-option7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helpers7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/template7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/traverse7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.7indirect
npm@blazediff/core1.9.1indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.11.3indirect
npm@emnapi/core2.0.0-alpha.3indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.3indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime2.0.0-alpha.3indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.3indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads2.0.1indirect
npm@istanbuljs/schema0.1.6indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/remapping2.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.2.2indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.142.0indirect
npm@polka/url1.0.0-next.29indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.3indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@vitest/browser4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/browser-playwright4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-istanbul4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.10indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmbaseline-browser-mapping2.10.37indirect
npmbrowserslist4.28.2indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001799indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmelectron-to-chromium1.5.373indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.0.0indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.3.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmgensync1.0.0-beta.2indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhtml-escaper2.0.2indirect
npmistanbul-lib-coverage3.2.2indirect
npmistanbul-lib-report3.0.1indirect
npmistanbul-reports3.2.0indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjsesc3.1.0indirect
npmjson52.2.3indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlru-cache5.1.1indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmagicast0.5.2indirect
npmmake-dir4.0.0indirect
npmmrmime2.0.1indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.16indirect
npmnode-releases2.0.47indirect
npmobug2.1.1indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmplaywright1.60.0indirect
npmplaywright-core1.60.0indirect
npmpngjs7.0.0indirect
npmpostcss8.5.25indirect
npmrolldown1.2.1indirect
npmsemver6.3.1indirect
npmsemver7.7.4indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsirv3.0.2indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.1.0indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.1.1indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmtotalist3.0.1indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmupdate-browserslist-db1.2.3indirect
npmvite8.2.0indirect
npmvitest4.1.10indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmws8.21.1indirect
npmyallist3.1.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:django-debug-toolbar@7.1.1 pulls in 3 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.