Public record
Software health reportschema 0.16.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 02:26 UTC

django-oauth / django-oauth-toolkit

OAuth2 goodies for the Djangonauts!

PythonCustom license★ 3,332 stars⑂ 848 forkssince May 2013View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined
#python#django#oauth2

django-oauth/django-oauth-toolkit holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Security (64/100). It was last updated 11 days ago. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 80 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Django OAuthOrganization
3 followers2 public repossince Jun 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIdjango-oauth-toolkit3.3.0-5052 days agodjangooauthoauth2oauthlib

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

68Good
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 11 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
17.3/18Commit volume — 83 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 28 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year83
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push11
active_weeks_last_year17

Release discipline

84Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 32 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 14 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~170.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count32
latest_release_tag3.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release14
mean_days_between_releases170.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

89Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

91Excellent
How it's scored
57.1/60Stars — 3,332 stars
24.4/25Forks — 848 forks
9.7/15Watchers — 57 watchers
Inputs used
forks848
stars3,332
watchers57
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

86Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

84Excellent
How it's scored
43.2/54Bus factor — 4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 24% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 54 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor4
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.242

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good
How it's scored
38.6/42Issue resolution — 92% of issues closed
23.2/30PR acceptance — 636/821 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 10/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs636
open_issues75
closed_issues837
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.918
closed_unmerged_prs185
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
4.3/25Owner reach — 3 followers of django-oauth
5.7/25Track record — 2 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers3
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_logindjango-oauth
public_repos2
account_age_days403
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 52 days ago
20/20Version history — 50 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdjango-oauth-toolkit
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish52

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — tox.ini
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://django-oauth-toolkit.readthedocs.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspython, django, oauth2
has_wikino
homepagehttps://django-oauth-toolkit.readthedocs.io
docs_sitehttps://django-oauth-toolkit.readthedocs.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

55Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 10/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 54 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 28 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
3/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 6
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 76 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages14
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:django-oauth-toolkit@3.3.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 14 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes1,013
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

74Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — tox.ini
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesdocs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 2/203 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes95,086
source_files_sampled203
oversized_source_files2

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — docs/rest-framework/openapi.yaml
0/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesdocs/rest-framework/openapi.yaml
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

3,332GitHub stars
100contributors
83commits, last 12 months
11days since last push
32releases
4bus factor
75open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 02:25 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 10/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 54 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 28 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
6SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 6
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities76 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIdjango>= 4.2pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>= 2.13.0pyproject.toml
PyPIoauthlib>= 3.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIjwcrypto>= 1.5.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 186

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 181 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIdjango—direct
PyPIdjango5.2direct
PyPIjwcrypto1.5.7direct
PyPIoauthlib3.3.1direct
PyPIrequests2.34.2direct
npm@dopry/svelte-oidc1.2.0indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.25.12indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/remapping2.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.25indirect
npm@polka/url1.0.0-next.28indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-commonjs28.0.9indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-json6.1.0indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-node-resolve16.0.3indirect
npm@rollup/pluginutils5.1.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.52.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.52.5indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.0.0indirect
npm@sveltejs/acorn-typescript1.0.6indirect
npm@sveltejs/adapter-auto7.0.0indirect
npm@sveltejs/adapter-node5.4.0indirect
npm@sveltejs/kit2.48.4indirect
npm@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte6.2.1indirect
npm@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte-inspector5.0.1indirect
npm@types/cookie0.6.0indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/resolve1.20.2indirect
npmacorn8.15.0indirect
npmaria-query5.3.2indirect
npmaxobject-query4.1.0indirect
npmchokidar4.0.3indirect
npmclsx2.1.1indirect
npmcommondir1.0.1indirect
npmcookie0.6.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeepmerge4.3.1indirect
npmdevalue5.4.2indirect
npmesbuild0.25.12indirect
npmesm-env1.2.2indirect
npmesrap2.1.2indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.2indirect
npmis-core-module2.16.1indirect
npmis-module1.0.0indirect
npmis-reference1.2.1indirect
npmis-reference3.0.3indirect
npmjose6.1.0indirect
npmjwt-decode4.0.0indirect
npmkleur4.1.5indirect
npmlocate-character3.0.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmri1.2.0indirect
npmmrmime2.0.0indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.11indirect
npmoidc-client-ts3.3.0indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.3indirect
npmpostcss8.5.6indirect
npmprettier3.6.2indirect
npmprettier-plugin-svelte3.4.0indirect
npmreaddirp4.1.2indirect
npmresolve1.22.11indirect
npmrollup4.52.5indirect
npmsade1.8.1indirect
npmset-cookie-parser2.6.0indirect
npmsirv3.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmsvelte5.43.2indirect
npmsvelte-check4.3.3indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.15indirect
npmtotalist3.0.1indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmvite7.1.12indirect
npmvitefu1.1.1indirect
npmzimmerframe1.1.4indirect
PyPI-—indirect
PyPIalabaster0.7.16indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIasgiref3.11.1indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.5.20indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.14.1indirect
PyPIcryptography48.0.0indirect
PyPIdjango-cors-headers4.6.0indirect
PyPIdjango-environ0.12.0indirect
PyPIdjango-ninja1.6.2indirect
PyPIdjango-oauth-toolkit—indirect
PyPIdjangorestframework3.17.1indirect
PyPIdocutils0.18.1indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIidna3.17indirect
PyPIidp0.1.0indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIm2r0.3.1indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImistune0.8.4indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-django4.12.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.15.1indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIruff0.15.15indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx7.2.6indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme1.3.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jquery4.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIsqlparse0.5.5indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2026.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIwhitenoise6.8.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:django-oauth-toolkit@3.3.0 pulls in 14 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with django-oauth/django-oauth-toolkit. Read them side by side →

99wagtail/wagtailA Django content management system focused on flexibility and user experienceExceptional98netbox-community/netboxThe premier source of truth powering network automation. Open source under Apache 2. Try NetBox Cloud free: https://netboxlabs.com/products/free-netbox-cloud/Exceptional98django/djangoThe Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.Exceptional98strawberry-graphql/strawberryA GraphQL library for Python that leverages type annotations 🍓Exceptional97typeddjango/django-stubsPEP-484 stubs for DjangoExceptional97elastic/apm-agent-pythonExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.16.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.