Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 00:02 UTC

dmind-gmbh / extension-cookieman

A GDPR tracking consent popup for the content management system TYPO3. It asks for approval to include tracking objects (cookies, images or any HTML) and includes the objects when consented.

PHP · HTML · JavaScriptGPL-2.0★ 37 stars⑂ 22 forkssince May 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindPluginLibraryhow this is determined
#typo3#gdpr#cookie#opt-in#typo3-extension#typo3-cms-extension#consent#cookies

dmind-gmbh/extension-cookieman holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (52/100). It was last updated 21 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

d-mind GmbHOrganization · verified domain
1 follower4 public repossince Apr 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistdmind/cookieman5.0.04,52113921 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

76Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

68Good
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 21 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
17.5/18Commit volume — 87 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 21 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year87
human_commit_share0.92
days_since_last_push21
active_weeks_last_year17

Release discipline

88Excellent
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 21 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~12.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag5.0.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release21
mean_days_between_releases12.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

38Weak
How it's scored
25.2/60Stars — 37 stars
11/25Forks — 22 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks22
stars37
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, poser.pugx.org
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

49Weak
How it's scored
48.7/80Monthly downloads — 4,521 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesdmind/cookieman
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads210,940
monthly_downloads4,521
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

34At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 95% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 17 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled17
top_contributor_share0.946

Issue & PR responsiveness

72Good
How it's scored
40/42Issue resolution — 95% of issues closed
23/30PR acceptance — 203/265 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs203
open_issues5
closed_issues101
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.953
closed_unmerged_prs62
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

69Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of dmind-gmbh
17.1/25Track record — 4 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logindmind-gmbh
public_repos4
account_age_days3,793

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 21 days ago
20/20Version history — 139 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdmind/cookieman
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish21

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php, eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://extensions.typo3.org/extension/cookieman
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicstypo3, gdpr, cookie, opt-in, typo3-extension, typo3-cms-extension, consent, cookies
has_wikino
homepagehttps://extensions.typo3.org/extension/cookieman
docs_sitehttps://extensions.typo3.org/extension/cookieman
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

54Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 21 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages161
unassessed_packages20
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 161 resolved dependencies against OSV. 20 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.typo3.org/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 91 of 92 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.typo3.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.989
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

76Good
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php, eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — Build/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
6/10Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 8 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesyarn.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsBuild/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.03
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.08
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — PHP with type-check config (Build/tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/42 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes21,778
source_files_sampled42
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

37GitHub stars
17contributors
87commits, last 12 months
21days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
5open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package 'dmind-cookieman' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 22 ⇿
0Stars
22Forks
86Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

048121620242222019-112022-082025-06
Major 1Minor 14Patch 71

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10
5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 00:02 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained21 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagisttypo3/cms-core14.*.x-dev || ^14.3composer.json
All dependencies 181

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 180 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagisttypo3/cms-core—direct
npm@emnapi/core2.0.0-alpha.3indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime2.0.0-alpha.3indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads2.0.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.10.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.2indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.23.5indirect
npm@eslint/config-helpers0.7.0indirect
npm@eslint/core1.2.1indirect
npm@eslint/js10.0.1indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema3.0.5indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.7.2indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.2indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.8indirect
npm@humanfs/types0.15.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.3indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.2.1indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.142.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher2.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-android-arm642.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-darwin-arm642.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-darwin-x642.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-freebsd-x642.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-glibc2.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-musl2.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-glibc2.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-musl2.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-glibc2.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-musl2.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-win32-arm642.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-win32-x642.6.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.1indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.3indirect
npm@types/esrecurse4.3.1indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/project-service8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/scope-manager8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/tsconfig-utils8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/type-utils8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/utils8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys8.65.0indirect
npmacorn8.16.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.15.0indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbaseline-browser-mapping2.11.8indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.9indirect
npmbrowserslist4.28.7indirect
npmbrowserslist-to-esbuild2.1.1indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001806indirect
npmchokidar5.0.0indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmelectron-to-chromium1.5.398indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint10.8.0indirect
npmeslint-scope9.1.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys5.0.1indirect
npmespree11.2.0indirect
npmesquery1.7.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfile-entry-cache8.0.0indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache4.0.1indirect
npmflatted3.4.4indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobals17.8.0indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmignore7.0.6indirect
npmimmutable5.1.9indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-cookie3.0.7indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmmeow13.2.0indirect
npmminimatch10.2.6indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.16indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmnode-addon-api7.1.1indirect
npmnode-releases2.0.51indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmpostcss8.5.25indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmreaddirp5.0.0indirect
npmrolldown1.2.1indirect
npmsass1.102.0indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmts-api-utils2.5.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmtypescript-eslint8.65.0indirect
npmupdate-browserslist-db1.2.3indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmvite8.2.0indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Packagistcodeception/codeception—indirect
Packagistcodeception/module-asserts—indirect
Packagistcodeception/module-webdriver—indirect
Packagistdmind/cookieman-test—indirect
Packagistdmind/cookieman-test-bootstrap5-modal—indirect
Packagistergebnis/composer-normalize—indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer—indirect
Packagisthelhum/typo3-console—indirect
Packagisthelmich/typo3-typoscript-lint—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Packagistssch/typo3-rector—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-fluid-styled-content—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-frontend—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-install—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-tstemplate—indirect
Packagisttypo3/coding-standards—indirect
Packagisttypo3/tailor—indirect
Packagisttypo3/testing-framework—indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 161 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 20 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
nanoid3.3.16indirecthigh15.1.6

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with dmind-gmbh/extension-cookieman. Read them side by side →

67eibiflo/cf_cookiemanagerSimple Typo3 Cookie ManagerGood88in2code-de/in2publish_corein2publish Community VersionExcellent78wazum/sluggiTYPO3 CMS URL path & slug manager — auto-sync, redirects, locking, access control, duplicate prevention & moreGood75sypets/brofixCheck for broken links, forked from TYPO3 system extension linkvalidatorGood67statikbe/laravel-cookie-consentThe package includes a script & styling for a cookie banner and a modal where the visitor can select his/her cookie preferences.Good93c15t/c15tThe Developer-First Cookie BannerExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.