Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 08:18 UTC

dmit-4884 / natscope

Web UI for NATS JetStream — browse, decode, publish and manage streams. Single binary, first-class Protobuf support

TypeScript · GoApache-2.0★ 8 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jul 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfaceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

dmit-4884/natscope holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (40/100). It was last updated 4 days ago.

62
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

62
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DmitriiPersonal account
0 followers3 public repossince Jun 2022

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/dmit-4884/natscopev0.2.0-449 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

68Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 4 days ago
1.4/36Commit cadence2/52 weeks with commits
16.3/18Commit volume64 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year64
human_commit_share0.953
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year2
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases4 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 49 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~1.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tagv0.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release49
mean_days_between_releases1.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
13.7/60Stars8 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars8
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgoreportcard.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

40Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
4.7/30PR acceptance3/19 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs3
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs16
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
0/25Owner reach0 followers of dmit-4884
12.9/25Track record3 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_logindmit-4884
public_repos3
account_age_days1,550
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 49 days ago
12/20Version history4 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/dmit-4884/natscope
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish49

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml, eslint.config.js
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://dmit-4884.github.io/natscope-site/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics14 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsconnect-rpc, developer-tools, golang, jetstream, messaging, nats, protobuf, react, web-ui, gui, nats-gui, nats-jetstream, nats-ui, ui
has_wikino
homepagehttps://dmit-4884.github.io/natscope-site/
docs_sitehttps://dmit-4884.github.io/natscope-site/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

41Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
3/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities44 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4.1

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history49 of 61 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.803
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml, eslint.config.js
11/11Static type checkingweb/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 64
8/8Automated maintenance3 of the last 64 commits are automated dependency updates
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsweb/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsdevtools/go.mod, go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.047
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/823 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes52,614
source_files_sampled823
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)proto/services/grpc/history/v1/history/history_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/mappings/v1/mappings/mappings_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/nats/v1/connections/nats_connections_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/nats/v1/live/nats_live_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/nats/v1/management/nats_management_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/nats/v1/messages/nats_messages_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/nats/v1/publish/nats_publish_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/nats/v1/stats/nats_stats_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/nats/v1/streams/nats_streams_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/proto/v1/codec/proto_codec_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/proto/v1/registry/proto_registry_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/proto/v1/selections/proto_selections_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/proto/v1/sources/proto_sources_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/settings/v1/settings/settings_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/templates/v1/templates/templates_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/workspace/v1/workspace/workspace_service.proto, proto/third_party/buf/validate/validate.proto, proto/third_party/google/api/field_behavior.proto, proto/third_party/google/rpc/error_details.proto, proto/third_party/io/altessa/badrequest/v1/badrequest.proto, proto/types/history/history_entry.proto, proto/types/mappings/mappings_mapping.proto, proto/types/nats/nats_connection.proto, proto/types/nats/nats_kv.proto, proto/types/nats/nats_message.proto, proto/types/nats/nats_object.proto, proto/types/nats/nats_stats.proto, proto/types/nats/nats_stream.proto, proto/types/proto/proto_codec.proto, proto/types/proto/proto_message_info.proto, proto/types/proto/proto_selection.proto, proto/types/proto/proto_source.proto, proto/types/proto/proto_version.proto, proto/types/settings/user_settings.proto, proto/types/templates/templates_template.proto
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesproto/services/grpc/history/v1/history/history_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/mappings/v1/mappings/mappings_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/nats/v1/connections/nats_connections_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/nats/v1/live/nats_live_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/nats/v1/management/nats_management_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/nats/v1/messages/nats_messages_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/nats/v1/publish/nats_publish_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/nats/v1/stats/nats_stats_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/nats/v1/streams/nats_streams_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/proto/v1/codec/proto_codec_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/proto/v1/registry/proto_registry_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/proto/v1/selections/proto_selections_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/proto/v1/sources/proto_sources_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/settings/v1/settings/settings_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/templates/v1/templates/templates_service.proto, proto/services/grpc/workspace/v1/workspace/workspace_service.proto, proto/third_party/buf/validate/validate.proto, proto/third_party/google/api/field_behavior.proto, proto/third_party/google/rpc/error_details.proto, proto/third_party/io/altessa/badrequest/v1/badrequest.proto, proto/types/history/history_entry.proto, proto/types/mappings/mappings_mapping.proto, proto/types/nats/nats_connection.proto, proto/types/nats/nats_kv.proto, proto/types/nats/nats_message.proto, proto/types/nats/nats_object.proto, proto/types/nats/nats_stats.proto, proto/types/nats/nats_stream.proto, proto/types/proto/proto_codec.proto, proto/types/proto/proto_message_info.proto, proto/types/proto/proto_selection.proto, proto/types/proto/proto_source.proto, proto/types/proto/proto_version.proto, proto/types/settings/user_settings.proto, proto/types/templates/templates_template.proto
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

8GitHub stars
-contributors
64commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
4releases
-bus factor
0open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No human contributors found; every contributor is an automation account
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 08:18 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
6Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities44 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 53
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/daixiang0/gciv0.14.0devtools/go.mod
Gogithub.com/golangci/golangci-lint/v2v2.12.2devtools/go.mod
Gobuf.build/gen/go/bufbuild/protovalidate/protocolbuffers/gov1.36.11-20260415201107-50325440f8f2.1go.mod
Gobuf.build/go/protovalidatev1.2.0go.mod
Goconnectrpc.com/connectv1.19.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/MakeNowJust/heredocv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/altessa-s/go-atlasv0.0.0-20260705105125-93baa219e2abgo.mod
Gogithub.com/altessa-s/proto-gen-gov0.1.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/bufbuild/protocompilev0.14.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.10.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-git/v5v5.18.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation/v4v4.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2v2.14.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/nats-io/nats.gov1.52.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/nats-io/nkeysv0.4.16go.mod
Gogithub.com/planetscale/vtprotobufv0.6.1-0.20240319094008-0393e58bdf10go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/zalando/go-keyringv0.2.8go.mod
Gogo.etcd.io/bboltv1.4.3go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/fxv1.24.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.36.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.21.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20260523011958-0a33c5d7ca68go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260523011958-0a33c5d7ca68go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.81.1go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11go.mod
npm@bufbuild/protobuf^2.13.0web/package.json
npm@codemirror/autocomplete^6.20.3web/package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-json^6.0.2web/package.json
npm@codemirror/language^6.12.4web/package.json
npm@codemirror/state^6.7.1web/package.json
npm@codemirror/view^6.43.7web/package.json
npm@connectrpc/connect^2.1.2web/package.json
npm@connectrpc/connect-web^2.1.2web/package.json
npm@lezer/highlight^1.2.3web/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-query^5.101.4web/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-virtual^3.14.8web/package.json
npm@uiw/react-codemirror^4.25.11web/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1web/package.json
npmcmdk^1.1.1web/package.json
npmdate-fns^4.4.0web/package.json
npmdiff^8.0.4web/package.json
npmreact^18.2.0web/package.json
npmreact-dom^18.2.0web/package.json
npmreact-hotkeys-hook^5.3.3web/package.json
npmreact-router-dom^7.18.1web/package.json
npmsonner^2.0.7web/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^3.6.0web/package.json
npmzod^4.4.3web/package.json
npmzustand^4.4.7web/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.