Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 17:29 UTC

docling-project / docling-core

Docling core data types and transformations

PythonMIT★ 280 stars⑂ 203 forkssince Jul 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

docling-project/docling-core holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (98/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (63/100). It was last updated 7 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 80 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Docling ProjectOrganization
1,276 followers27 public repossince Nov 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIdocling-core2.92.06,155,6011748 days agodoclingdiscoveryetlinformation-retrievalanalyticsdatabasedatabase-schemaschemajson

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

98Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

96Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 7 days ago
31.8/36Commit cadence — 46/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 261 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year261
human_commit_share0.74
days_since_last_push7
active_weeks_last_year46

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 8 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~6.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2.92.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release8
mean_days_between_releases6.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

80Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

64Moderate
How it's scored
39.7/60Stars — 280 stars
19.2/25Forks — 203 forks
5/15Watchers — 9 watchers
Inputs used
forks203
stars280
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges8
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 6,155,601 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdocling-core
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads6,155,601
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

74Good
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 34% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 62 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled62
top_contributor_share0.345

Issue & PR responsiveness

66Good
How it's scored
26.5/42Issue resolution — 63% of issues closed
25.1/30PR acceptance — 449/536 decided PRs merged
4.3/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 23/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs449
open_issues50
closed_issues86
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d11
prs_decided_30d16
issue_closed_ratio0.632
closed_unmerged_prs87
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d3

Ownership & stewardship

66Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
22.3/25Owner reach — 1,276 followers of docling-project
14.1/25Track record — 27 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,276
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logindocling-project
public_repos27
account_age_days651

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 8 days ago
20/20Version history — 174 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdocling-core
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish8

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

82Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

60Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 23/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages31
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:docling-core@2.92.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 31 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 74 of 74 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

60Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — docling_core/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
6/10Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsdocling_core/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.03
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

80Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (docling_core/py.typed)
52.8/55Manageable file sizes — 7/172 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes217,603
source_files_sampled172
oversized_source_files7

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples, notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, notebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

280GitHub stars
62contributors
261commits, last 12 months
7days since last push
100releases
3bus factor
50open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 203 ⇿
0Stars
203Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020024020342024-092025-082026-08
Major 0Minor 66Patch 34

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 17:28 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests23 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 23/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIjsonschema(>=4.16.0,<5.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic(>=2.6.0,<3.0.0,!=2.10.0,!=2.10.1,!=2.10.2)pyproject.toml
PyPIjsonref(>=1.1.0,<2.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPItabulate(>=0.9.0,<0.11.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas(>=2.1.4,<4.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIpillow(>=10.0.0,<13.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml(>=5.1,<7.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions(>=4.12.2,<5.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPItyper(>=0.12.5,<0.27.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIlatex2mathml(>=3.77.0,<4.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIdefusedxml(>=0.7.1, <0.8.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settings>=2.14.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdoclang>=0.7,<0.8pyproject.toml
All dependencies 180

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 166 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1direct
PyPIdoclang0.7.3direct
PyPIjsonref1.1.0direct
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0direct
PyPIlatex2mathml3.81.0direct
PyPIpandas2.3.3direct
PyPIpandas3.0.5direct
PyPIpillow12.3.0direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.4direct
PyPIpydantic-settings2.15.0direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPItabulate0.10.0direct
PyPItyper0.24.2direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0direct
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.7.1indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.5indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIappnope0.1.4indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.8.0indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.2indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbackports-tarfile1.2.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.1indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIclick-log0.4.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcomm0.2.3indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.2indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.4indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIdatasets5.0.1indirect
PyPIdclq2.92.0indirect
PyPIdebugpy1.8.21indirect
PyPIdecorator5.3.1indirect
PyPIdill0.4.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdocling-core2.92.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.23indirect
PyPIdotty-dict1.3.1indirect
PyPIet-xmlfile2.0.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.3indirect
PyPIfonttools4.63.0indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.6.0indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.12indirect
PyPIgitpython3.1.59indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.6.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub1.27.0indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.19indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata9.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIinvoke2.2.1indirect
PyPIipykernel6.31.0indirect
PyPIipython8.39.0indirect
PyPIipython9.16.1indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.6.0indirect
PyPIjedi0.20.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjsondiff2.2.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-client8.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-core5.9.1indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.5.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.15.0indirect
PyPIlxml6.1.1indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.10.9indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.11.1indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.2indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPImpire2.10.2indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPImultiprocess0.70.19indirect
PyPImypy2.1.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInest-asyncio1.6.0indirect
PyPInh30.3.6indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.2.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.6indirect
PyPIopencv-python-headless4.14.0.94indirect
PyPIopenpyxl3.1.5indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpandas-stubs2.3.3.260113indirect
PyPIparso0.8.7indirect
PyPIpathlib-abc0.5.2indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpkginfo1.12.1.2indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.3indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.53indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyarrow25.0.1indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.5.2indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.3indirect
PyPIpython-gitlab3.15.0indirect
PyPIpython-semantic-release7.34.6indirect
PyPIpytz2026.3.post1indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyzmq27.1.0indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer45.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.7.19indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIruff0.16.3indirect
PyPIsafetensors0.8.0indirect
PyPIsaxonche13.0.0indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIsemchunk3.2.5indirect
PyPIsemver2.13.0indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.3indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPItiktoken0.12.0indirect
PyPItokenizers0.22.2indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomlkit0.15.1indirect
PyPItornado6.5.8indirect
PyPItqdm4.70.0indirect
PyPItraitlets5.16.1indirect
PyPItransformers5.8.1indirect
PyPItree-sitter0.26.0indirect
PyPItree-sitter-c0.24.2indirect
PyPItree-sitter-java-orchard0.5.15indirect
PyPItree-sitter-javascript0.25.0indirect
PyPItree-sitter-python0.25.0indirect
PyPItree-sitter-typescript0.23.2indirect
PyPItwine3.8.0indirect
PyPItypes-defusedxml0.7.0.20260504indirect
PyPItypes-pytz2026.3.1.20260727indirect
PyPItypes-setuptools70.3.0.20240710indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.4indirect
PyPItzdata2026.3indirect
PyPIuniversal-pathlib0.3.10indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.7.4indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.2indirect
PyPIwheel0.48.0indirect
PyPIxxhash4.0.1indirect
PyPIyarl1.24.5indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:docling-core@2.92.0 pulls in 31 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with docling-project/docling-core. Read them side by side →

98dagster-io/dagsterAn orchestration platform for the development, production, and observation of data assets.Exceptional96snowflakedb/snowpark-pythonSnowflake Snowpark Python APIExceptional96StarRocks/starrocksThe world's fastest open query engine for sub-second analytics both on and off the data lakehouse. With the flexibility to support nearly any scenario, StarRocks provides best-in-class performance for multi-dimensional analytics, real-time analytics, and ad-hoc queries. A Linux Foundation project.Exceptional96rjsf-team/react-jsonschema-formA React component for building Web forms from JSON Schema.Exceptional96duckdb/duckdbDuckDB is an analytical in-process SQL database management systemExceptional96Canner/WrenAIGenBI (Generative BI) for AI agents, an open-source, governed text-to-SQL through an open context layer that turns natural-language questions into trusted dashboards, charts, and SQL across 20+ data sources, such as BigQuery, Snowflake, PostgreSQL, ClickHouse, Amazon Redshift, Databricks and more.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.