Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 18:27 UTC

doctrine / DoctrineBundle

Symfony Bundle for Doctrine ORM and DBAL

PHPMIT★ 4,831 stars⑂ 482 forkssince Nov 2011View on GitHub ↗
KindPluginLibraryNetwork serviceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

doctrine/DoctrineBundle holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (38/100). It was last updated 9 days ago. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

96
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

96
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 83 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DoctrineOrganization · verified domain
346 followers77 public repossince Feb 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistdoctrine/doctrine-bundle3.3.14,747,48315235 days agodatabaseormpersistencedbal

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 9 days ago
29.8/36Commit cadence43/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume491 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year491
human_commit_share0.86
days_since_last_push9
active_weeks_last_year43

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 35 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~5.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag2.19.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release35
mean_days_between_releases5.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

86Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
59.8/60Stars4,831 stars
22.4/25Forks482 forks
9.3/15Watchers48 watchers
Inputs used
forks482
stars4,831
watchers48
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads4,747,483 downloads/month across packagist
20/20Registry dependents4,200 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesdoctrine/doctrine-bundle
dependents4,200
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads263,265,162
monthly_downloads4,747,483
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

90Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
43.2/54Bus factor4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 18% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 87 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor4
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.181
How it's scored
40.5/42Issue resolution96% of issues closed
23.6/30PR acceptance1,053/1,340 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 8/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs1,053
open_issues31
closed_issues846
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.965
closed_unmerged_prs287
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
18.3/25Owner reach346 followers of doctrine
25/25Track record77 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers346
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logindoctrine
public_repos77
account_age_days6,029

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 35 days ago
20/20Version history152 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdoctrine/doctrine-bundle
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish35

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.doctrine-project.org/projects/doctrine-bundle.html
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicssymfony, doctrine, bundle, symfony-bundle
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.doctrine-project.org/projects/doctrine-bundle.html
docs_sitehttps://www.doctrine-project.org/projects/doctrine-bundle.html
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

78Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-ReviewFound 8/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 87 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate7.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages1
unassessed_packages35
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 1 resolved dependencies against OSV. 35 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

38Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
37.2/40Legible commit history60 of 86 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.698
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance13 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.13
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
53.6/55Manageable file sizes3/118 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes64,874
source_files_sampled118
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

4,831GitHub stars
99contributors
491commits, last 12 months
9days since last push
100releases
4bus factor
31open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 482 ⇿
0Stars
482Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010020030040050047382011-122019-042026-08
Major 1Minor 22Patch 77

Each point covers 14 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.2 / 10
7.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 18:26 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 8/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 87 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistdoctrine/dbal^4.0composer.json
Packagistdoctrine/deprecations^1.0composer.json
Packagistdoctrine/persistence^4composer.json
Packagistdoctrine/sql-formatter^1.0.1composer.json
Packagistsymfony/cache^6.4 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/config^6.4 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^6.4 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection^6.4 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/doctrine-bridge^6.4.3 || ^7.0.3 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundle^6.4 || ^7.0 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts^3composer.json
All dependencies 36

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 25 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistdoctrine/dbaldirect
Packagistdoctrine/deprecationsdirect
Packagistdoctrine/persistencedirect
Packagistdoctrine/sql-formatterdirect
Packagistsymfony/cachedirect
Packagistsymfony/configdirect
Packagistsymfony/consoledirect
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injectiondirect
Packagistsymfony/doctrine-bridgedirect
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundledirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contractsdirect
Packagistdoctrine/coding-standardindirect
Packagistdoctrine/docs-builderindirect
Packagistdoctrine/ormindirect
Packagistext-mbstringindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstanindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit2.0.3indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-strict-rulesindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-symfonyindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistpsr/logindirect
Packagistsymfony/doctrine-messengerindirect
Packagistsymfony/expression-languageindirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kernelindirect
Packagistsymfony/messengerindirect
Packagistsymfony/property-infoindirect
Packagistsymfony/runtimeindirect
Packagistsymfony/security-bundleindirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatchindirect
Packagistsymfony/stringindirect
Packagistsymfony/twig-bridgeindirect
Packagistsymfony/validatorindirect
Packagistsymfony/web-profiler-bundleindirect
Packagistsymfony/yamlindirect
Packagisttwig/twigindirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 1 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 35 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.