Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 16:06 UTC

doctrine / dbal

Doctrine Database Abstraction Layer

PHPMIT★ 9,703 stars⑂ 1,377 forkssince May 2010View on GitHub ↗

doctrine/dbal holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (39/100). It was last updated 14 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 81 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DoctrineOrganization · verified domain
346 followers77 public repossince Feb 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistdoctrine/dbal4.4.410,133,05217837 days agodatabasedbalqueryobjectsqlabstractionmysqlsqlitepostgresqlpdopgsqlsqlservermssqloraclemariadbsqlsrvoci8db2sasql

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 14 days ago
27.7/36Commit cadence40/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume258 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year258
human_commit_share0.89
days_since_last_push14
active_weeks_last_year40

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 37 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~31.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag4.4.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release37
mean_days_between_releases31.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

90Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars9,703 stars
25/25Forks1,377 forks
11.3/15Watchers107 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,377
stars9,703
watchers107
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads10,133,052 downloads/month across packagist
20/20Registry dependents6,624 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesdoctrine/dbal
dependents6,624
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads623,659,761
monthly_downloads10,133,052
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

82Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 36% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 100 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.356
How it's scored
37.6/42Issue resolution90% of issues closed
22.4/30PR acceptance3,512/4,714 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 11/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs3,512
open_issues285
closed_issues2,443
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d13
prs_decided_30d18
issue_closed_ratio0.896
closed_unmerged_prs1,202
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d3
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
18.3/25Owner reach346 followers of doctrine
25/25Track record77 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers346
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logindoctrine
public_repos77
account_age_days6,029

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 37 days ago
20/20Version history178 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdoctrine/dbal
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish37

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows16 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests18 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.doctrine-project.org/projects/dbal.html
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdatabase, mysql, postgresql, oracle, ibm-db2, sqlite, sql-server, mariadb
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.doctrine-project.org/projects/dbal.html
docs_sitehttps://www.doctrine-project.org/projects/dbal.html
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

73Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests18 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 11/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 100 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate6.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages2
assessed_packages63
unassessed_packages2
affected_by_severityhigh 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 63 resolved dependencies against OSV. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

39Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history70 of 89 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.787
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance11 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.11
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
54.8/55Manageable file sizes3/687 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes80,788
source_files_sampled687
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

9,703GitHub stars
99contributors
258commits, last 12 months
14days since last push
100releases
3bus factor
285open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-07-09: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 9703 stars today.

More detail

Star and fork history 9,704 ★ / 1,377 ⇿
9,704Stars
1,377Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-09. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

02,0004,0006,0008,00010,0009,7041,377662015-022020-112026-08
Major 1Minor 14Patch 80

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10
6.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 16:05 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests18 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 11/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 100 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistdoctrine/deprecations^1.1.5composer.json
Packagistpsr/cache^1|^2|^3composer.json
Packagistpsr/log^1|^2|^3composer.json
All dependencies 65

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 64 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistpsr/log1.1.3direct
Packagistamphp/amp2.5.0indirect
Packagistamphp/byte-stream1.8.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/package-versions-deprecated1.11.99indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver1.7.1indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler1.4.3indirect
Packagistdealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer0.7.0indirect
Packagistdnoegel/php-xdg-base-dir0.1.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/cache1.7.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/coding-standard8.1.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/dbalindirect
Packagistdoctrine/docs-builderindirect
Packagistdoctrine/event-manager1.0.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator1.3.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/shards0.3indirect
Packagistfelixfbecker/advanced-json-rpc3.1.1indirect
Packagistfelixfbecker/language-server-protocol1.4.0indirect
Packagistjetbrains/phpstorm-stubs2019.3indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.10.1indirect
Packagistnetresearch/jsonmapper2.1.0indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser4.9.0indirect
Packagistopenlss/lib-array2xml1.0.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.1indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.0.2indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common2.2.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock5.2.2indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver1.4.0indirect
Packagistphpspec/prophecy1.12.1indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser0.4.4indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan0.12.42indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-strict-rules0.12.2indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage9.2.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator3.0.5indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker3.1.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template2.0.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer5.0.2indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit9.4.0indirect
Packagistpsalm/plugin-phpunit0.10.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser1.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit1.0.7indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup2.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator4.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity2.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff4.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment5.1.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter4.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state5.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code1.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator4.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector2.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context4.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/resource-operations3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/type2.3.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/version3.0.2indirect
Packagistslevomat/coding-standard6.3.10indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer3.5.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/console4.2.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/contracts1.0.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.18.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.10.0indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.2.0indirect
Packagistvimeo/psalm3.17.2indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.9.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/glob4.1.0indirect
Packagistwebmozart/path-util2.3.0indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 63 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
phpunit/phpunit9.4.0indirecthigh112.5.8
squizlabs/php_codesniffer3.5.8indirecthigh14.0.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.