Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 17:21 UTC

doctrine / persistence

The Doctrine Persistence project is a library that provides common abstractions for object mapper persistence.

PHPMIT★ 4,045 stars⑂ 74 forkssince Jun 2018View on GitHub ↗

doctrine/persistence holds a health index of 93 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (44/100). It was last updated 70 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

93
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

93
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DoctrineOrganization · verified domain
346 followers77 public repossince Feb 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistdoctrine/persistence4.2.06,475,94962123 days agoormpersistenceobjectodmmapper

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 70 days ago
13.2/36Commit cadence19/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume119 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year119
human_commit_share0.85
days_since_last_push70
active_weeks_last_year19

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases62 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 70 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~33.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count62
latest_release_tag3.4.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release70
mean_days_between_releases33.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

82Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
58.5/60Stars4,045 stars
15.5/25Forks74 forks
7.1/15Watchers20 watchers
Inputs used
forks74
stars4,045
watchers20
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads6,475,949 downloads/month across packagist
19.4/20Registry dependents806 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesdoctrine/persistence
dependents806
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads316,501,938
monthly_downloads6,475,949
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

85Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 36% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth85 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 65 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled85
top_contributor_share0.365
How it's scored
32.9/42Issue resolution78% of issues closed
26.2/30PR acceptance397/454 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 4/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs397
open_issues13
closed_issues47
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.783
closed_unmerged_prs57
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
18.3/25Owner reach346 followers of doctrine
25/25Track record77 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers346
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logindoctrine
public_repos77
account_age_days6,029

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 123 days ago
20/20Version history62 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdoctrine/persistence
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish123

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configphpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.doctrine-project.org/projects/persistence.html
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspersistence, hacktoberfest
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.doctrine-project.org/projects/persistence.html
docs_sitehttps://www.doctrine-project.org/projects/persistence.html
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 4/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 65 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate6.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages2
assessed_packages71
unassessed_packages1
affected_by_severityhigh 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 71 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

44Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
36.4/40Legible commit history58 of 85 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.682
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configphpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance15 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.15
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/72 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes14,508
source_files_sampled72
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

4,045GitHub stars
85contributors
119commits, last 12 months
70days since last push
62releases
3bus factor
13open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 74 ⇿
0Stars
74Forks
58Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325385063757432018-062022-042026-03
Major 4Minor 13Patch 41

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10
6.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 17:21 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 4/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 65 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistdoctrine/deprecations^1composer.json
Packagistdoctrine/event-manager^1 || ^2composer.json
Packagistpsr/cache^1.0 || ^2.0 || ^3.0composer.json
All dependencies 72

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 71 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistdoctrine/event-manager1.1.1direct
Packagistamphp/amp2.5.1indirect
Packagistamphp/byte-stream1.8.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/package-versions-deprecated1.11.99.1indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.2.4indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler1.4.5indirect
Packagistdealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer0.7.0indirect
Packagistdnoegel/php-xdg-base-dir0.1.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/annotations1.11.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/cache1.10.2indirect
Packagistdoctrine/coding-standard8.2.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/collections1.6.7indirect
Packagistdoctrine/common3.0.2indirect
Packagistdoctrine/docs-builderindirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator1.4.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer1.2.1indirect
Packagistfelixfbecker/advanced-json-rpc3.1.1indirect
Packagistfelixfbecker/language-server-protocol1.5.0indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.10.2indirect
Packagistnetresearch/jsonmapper2.1.0indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser4.10.2indirect
Packagistopenlss/lib-array2xml1.0.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.1indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.0.2indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common2.2.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock5.2.2indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver1.4.0indirect
Packagistphpspec/prophecy1.12.1indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser0.4.9indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan0.12.57indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit0.12.16indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-strict-rules0.12.5indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage9.2.5indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator3.0.5indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker3.1.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template2.0.4indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer5.0.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit9.4.3indirect
Packagistpsr/container1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log1.1.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser1.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit1.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup2.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator4.0.6indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity2.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment5.1.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter4.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state5.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code1.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector2.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/resource-operations3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/type2.3.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/version3.0.2indirect
Packagistslevomat/coding-standard6.4.1indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer3.5.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/console5.1.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.20.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.20.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.20.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.20.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php731.20.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.20.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts2.2.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/string5.1.8indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.2.0indirect
Packagistvimeo/psalm3.18.2indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.9.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/glob4.1.0indirect
Packagistwebmozart/path-util2.3.0indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 71 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
phpunit/phpunit9.4.3indirecthigh112.5.8
squizlabs/php_codesniffer3.5.8indirecthigh14.0.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.