Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-21 00:21 UTC

dominikh / go-tools

Staticcheck - The advanced Go linter

GoMIT★ 6,911 stars⑂ 430 forkssince Jan 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

dominikh/go-tools holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (82/100) and lowest on Security (56/100). It was last updated 8 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Dominik HonnefPersonal account
1,892 followers115 public repossince Dec 2008Open-source developer

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gohonnef.co/go/toolsv0.8.2-478 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 8 days ago
19.4/36Commit cadence — 28/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 116 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year116
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push8
active_weeks_last_year28
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 44 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 8 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~92.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count44
latest_release_tag2026.2.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release8
mean_days_between_releases92.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

82Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 6,911 stars
21.9/25Forks — 430 forks
10.3/15Watchers — 72 watchers
Inputs used
forks430
stars6,911
watchers72
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 78 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled78
top_contributor_share0.936
How it's scored
26.6/42Issue resolution — 63% of issues closed
2/30PR acceptance — 14/214 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/38 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs14
open_issues562
closed_issues971
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d38
issue_closed_ratio0.633
closed_unmerged_prs200
first_time_authors_30d5
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d38
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
23.6/25Owner reach — 1,892 followers of dominikh
25/25Track record — 115 public repos, account ~17 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,892
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logindominikh
public_repos115
account_age_days6,522
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 8 days ago
20/20Version history — 47 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageshonnef.co/go/tools
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish8

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://staticcheck.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicslinters, static-analysis, linter, staticcheck, sponsor
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://staticcheck.dev
docs_sitehttps://staticcheck.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
3.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 19 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
13/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: postcss 8.4.31 (high 7.5), golang.org/x/mod v0.35.0 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33.7/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 179 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories19
affected_packages9
assessed_packages86
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 6, moderate 2, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 86 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
30.4/40Legible commit history — 57 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.57
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — go.mod, website/go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Nix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod, website/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 2/1,011 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes104,916
source_files_sampled1,011
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

6,911GitHub stars
78contributors
116commits, last 12 months
8days since last push
44releases
1bus factor
562open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch go package 'honnef.co/go/tools/website' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 430 ⇿
0Stars
430Forks
43Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010020030040050042482017-012021-122026-10
Major 0Minor 0Patch 30

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-21 00:21 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities19 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/BurntSushi/tomlv1.4.1-0.20240526193622-a339e1f7089cgo.mod
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20231110203233-9a3e6036ecaago.mod
Gogolang.org/x/exp/typeparamsv0.0.0-20231108232855-2478ac86f678go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.41.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.23.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.51.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/tools/go/expectv0.1.1-deprecatedgo.mod
Gogithub.com/BurntSushi/tomlv1.4.1-0.20240526193622-a339e1f7089cwebsite/go.mod
Gohonnef.co/go/toolsv0.0.0-00010101000000-000000000000website/go.mod
npmautoprefixer^10.4.13website/package.json
npmpostcss^8.4.31website/package.json
npmpostcss-cli^10.1.0website/package.json
All dependencies 86

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 72 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/burntsushi/tomlv1.4.1-0.20240526193622-a339e1f7089cdirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20231110203233-9a3e6036ecaadirect
Gogolang.org/x/exp/typeparamsv0.0.0-20231108232855-2478ac86f678direct
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.35.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.41.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.23.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.44.1-0.20260420230617-19499e7caabcdirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.51.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/tools/go/expectv0.1.1-deprecateddirect
npmautoprefixer10.4.13direct
npmpostcss8.4.31direct
npmpostcss-cli10.1.0direct
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmanymatch3.1.3indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.2.0indirect
npmbraces3.0.2indirect
npmbrowserslist4.21.5indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001450indirect
npmchokidar3.5.3indirect
npmcliui8.0.1indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmdependency-graph0.11.0indirect
npmdir-glob3.0.1indirect
npmelectron-to-chromium1.4.284indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmescalade3.1.1indirect
npmfast-glob3.2.12indirect
npmfastq1.15.0indirect
npmfill-range7.0.1indirect
npmfraction.js4.2.0indirect
npmfs-extra11.1.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-stdin9.0.0indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglobby13.1.3indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.10indirect
npmignore5.2.4indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmjsonfile6.1.0indirect
npmlilconfig2.0.6indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.5indirect
npmnanoid3.3.6indirect
npmnode-releases2.0.9indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmnormalize-range0.1.2indirect
npmpath-type4.0.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.0.0indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpify2.3.0indirect
npmpostcss-load-config4.0.1indirect
npmpostcss-reporter7.0.5indirect
npmpostcss-value-parser4.2.0indirect
npmpretty-hrtime1.0.3indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmread-cache1.0.0indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmslash4.0.0indirect
npmslash5.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.0.2indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmthenby1.3.4indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmuniversalify2.0.0indirect
npmupdate-browserslist-db1.0.10indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyaml2.3.4indirect
npmyargs17.6.2indirect
npmyargs-parser21.1.1indirect
Dependency advisories 9

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 86 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 9 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
postcss8.4.31directhigh48.5.23
braces3.0.2indirecthigh23.0.3
browserslist4.21.5indirecthigh24.28.7
nanoid3.3.6indirecthigh45.1.16
picomatch2.3.1indirecthigh24.0.4
source-map-js1.0.2indirecthigh11.2.2
micromatch4.0.5indirectmoderate14.0.8
yaml2.3.4indirectmoderate12.8.3
golang.org/x/modv0.35.0directunknown21.27.0-rc.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.