Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 16:41 UTC

dotCMS / core-web

dotCMS UI

TypeScriptNo license detected★ 46 stars⑂ 30 forkssince May 2015archivedView on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryWeb interfacehow this is determined

dotCMS/core-web holds a health index of 18 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (78/100) and lowest on Security (16/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.

18
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

18
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 47 is calibrated to 45 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

dotCMSOrganization
62 followers141 public repossince Aug 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npmdotcms-ui5.1.6-17319427870313,2851,379671 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

25At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 671 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project is archived
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push671
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

60Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 33 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 1,891 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~28.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count33
latest_release_tagv21.06
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,891
mean_days_between_releases28.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

44Weak
How it's scored
26.8/60Stars — 46 stars
12.2/25Forks — 30 forks
5/15Watchers — 9 watchers
Inputs used
forks30
stars46
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

32At Risk
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

59Moderate
How it's scored
46.9/80Monthly downloads — 3,285 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdotcms-ui
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,285
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

78Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

75Good
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 30% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 22 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled22
top_contributor_share0.297

Issue & PR responsiveness

90Excellent
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
27.2/30PR acceptance — 1,806/1,994 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 13/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs1,806
open_issues0
closed_issues25
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs188
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

68Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
12.9/25Owner reach — 62 followers of dotCMS
25/25Track record — 141 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers62
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logindotCMS
public_repos141
account_age_days5,504

Package maintenance

79Good
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
14/35Publish recency — latest publish 671 days ago
20/20Version history — 1,379 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdotcms-ui
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish671

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

64Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

70Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://dotcms.com
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://dotcms.com
docs_sitehttps://dotcms.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

16Critical · 16% of overall

Security posture

16Critical
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 13/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
0/7.5Maintained — project is archived
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 230 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate1.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

52Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

24At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
24/40Legible commit history — 45 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.45
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc.json
11/11Static type checking — .storybook/tsconfig.json, apps/dotcdn-e2e/tsconfig.json, apps/dotcdn/tsconfig.json, apps/dotcms-block-editor-e2e/tsconfig.json, apps/dotcms-block-editor/.storybook/tsconfig.json, apps/dotcms-block-editor/tsconfig.json, apps/dotcms-ui-e2e/tsconfig.json, apps/dotcms-ui/.storybook/tsconfig.json, apps/dotcms-ui/tsconfig.json, libs/block-editor/.storybook/tsconfig.json, libs/block-editor/tsconfig.json, libs/dot-layout-grid/tsconfig.json, libs/dot-primeng-theme-styles/tsconfig.json, libs/dot-rules/tsconfig.json, libs/dotcms-field-elements/tsconfig.json, libs/dotcms-js/tsconfig.json, libs/dotcms-models/tsconfig.json, libs/dotcms-webcomponents/.storybook/tsconfig.json, libs/dotcms-webcomponents/tsconfig.json, libs/dotcms/tsconfig.json, libs/ui/tsconfig.json, libs/utils/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs.storybook/tsconfig.json, apps/dotcdn-e2e/tsconfig.json, apps/dotcdn/tsconfig.json, apps/dotcms-block-editor-e2e/tsconfig.json, apps/dotcms-block-editor/.storybook/tsconfig.json, apps/dotcms-block-editor/tsconfig.json, apps/dotcms-ui-e2e/tsconfig.json, apps/dotcms-ui/.storybook/tsconfig.json, apps/dotcms-ui/tsconfig.json, libs/block-editor/.storybook/tsconfig.json, libs/block-editor/tsconfig.json, libs/dot-layout-grid/tsconfig.json, libs/dot-primeng-theme-styles/tsconfig.json, libs/dot-rules/tsconfig.json, libs/dotcms-field-elements/tsconfig.json, libs/dotcms-js/tsconfig.json, libs/dotcms-models/tsconfig.json, libs/dotcms-webcomponents/.storybook/tsconfig.json, libs/dotcms-webcomponents/tsconfig.json, libs/dotcms/tsconfig.json, libs/ui/tsconfig.json, libs/utils/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes — 5/1,534 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes83,454
source_files_sampled1,534
oversized_source_files5

Key facts

46GitHub stars
22contributors
0commits, last 12 months
671days since last push
33releases
3bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 30 ⇿
0Stars
30Forks
33Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0510152025303022017-032020-122024-08
Major 1Minor 3Patch 22

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.6 / 10
1.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 16:41 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 13/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintainedproject is archived
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities230 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 56
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@angular/animations13.2.3package.json
npm@angular/cdk13.2.3package.json
npm@angular/common13.2.3package.json
npm@angular/compiler13.2.3package.json
npm@angular/core13.2.3package.json
npm@angular/elements13.2.3package.json
npm@angular/forms13.2.3package.json
npm@angular/platform-browser13.2.3package.json
npm@angular/platform-browser-dynamic13.2.3package.json
npm@angular/router13.2.3package.json
npm@ctrl/tinycolor^3.1.7package.json
npm@material/mwc-button^0.20.0package.json
npm@material/mwc-checkbox^0.20.0package.json
npm@material/mwc-dialog^0.20.0package.json
npm@material/mwc-formfield^0.20.0package.json
npm@material/mwc-icon-button^0.20.0package.json
npm@material/mwc-menu^0.20.0package.json
npm@ngrx/component-store13.0.2package.json
npm@nrwl/angular13.8.3package.json
npm@tarekraafat/autocomplete.js^10.2.6package.json
npm@tiptap/core^2.0.0-beta.174package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-bubble-menu^2.0.0-beta.55package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-floating-menu^2.0.0-beta.50package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-highlight^2.0.0-beta.33package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-link^2.0.0-beta.36package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-placeholder^2.0.0-beta.48package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-text-align^2.0.0-beta.29package.json
npm@tiptap/extension-underline^2.0.0-beta.23package.json
npm@tiptap/starter-kit^2.0.0-beta.183package.json
npm@tiptap/suggestion^2.0.0-beta.90package.json
npm@webcomponents/webcomponentsjs^2.6.0package.json
npmchart.js^2.9.4package.json
npmcore-js^3.9.1package.json
npmcross-fetch^3.1.4package.json
npmdate-fns^2.25.0package.json
npmdate-fns-tz^1.1.6package.json
npmdocument-register-element^1.7.2package.json
npmdom-autoscroller^2.3.4package.json
npmfont-awesome^4.7.0package.json
npmhtmldiff-js^1.0.5package.json
npmlodash^4.17.20package.json
npmmd5^2.3.0package.json
npmng2-dragula^2.1.1package.json
npmngx-markdown^10.1.1package.json
npmngx-monaco-editor^9.0.0package.json
npmnode-fetch^2.6.1package.json
npmprimeflex^3.1.2package.json
npmprimeicons^5.0.0package.json
npmprimeng^13.1.0package.json
npmprosemirror-model^1.16.1package.json
npmprosemirror-view^1.23.12package.json
npmregenerator-runtime^0.13.9package.json
npmrxjs~6.6.3package.json
npmtest^0.6.0package.json
npmtslib^2.0.0package.json
npmzone.js0.11.4package.json
All dependencies 0

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies to assess

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with dotCMS/core-web. Read them side by side →

100microsoft/onnxruntimeONNX Runtime: cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing and training acceleratorExceptional100supabase/supabase-jsAn isomorphic Javascript client for Supabase. Query your Supabase database, subscribe to realtime events, upload and download files, browse typescript examples, invoke postgres functions via rpc, invoke supabase edge functions, query pgvector.Exceptional100clerk/javascriptOfficial JavaScript repository for Clerk authenticationExceptional100hashicorp/consulConsul is a distributed, highly available, and data center aware solution to connect and configure applications across dynamic, distributed infrastructure.Exceptional100mlco2/codecarbonTrack emissions from Compute and recommend ways to reduce their impact on the environment.Exceptional100eslint/eslintFind and fix problems in your JavaScript code.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.