Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-23 01:59 UTC

dotmake-build / command-line

Declarative syntax for System.CommandLine via attributes for easy, fast, strongly-typed (no reflection) usage. Includes a source generator which automagically converts your classes to CLI commands and properties to CLI options or CLI arguments.

C#MIT★ 168 stars⑂ 15 forkssince Dec 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

dotmake-build/command-line holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (77/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (38/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DotMakeOrganization
7 followers4 public repossince Dec 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetDotMake.CommandLine3.6.0-230 days agocommand-linecliconsolesystem.commandlinedeclarativeattributesparsingcommandargumentoptiongenerator

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

77Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence14/52 weeks with commits
13.9/18Commit volume34 commits in the last year
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
commits_last_year34
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year14

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases57 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~41.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count57
latest_release_tagv3.6.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases41.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

53Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
36.1/60Stars168 stars
9.6/25Forks15 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks15
stars168
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
56.4/80Total downloads270,344 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesDotMake.CommandLine
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads270,344
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 91% of commits
12.2/13.5Contributor breadth9 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled9
top_contributor_share0.914
How it's scored
36.6/42Issue resolution87% of issues closed
25.4/30PR acceptance11/13 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 3/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs11
open_issues9
closed_issues61
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.871
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
6.5/25Owner reach7 followers of dotmake-build
10.5/25Track record4 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers7
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logindotmake-build
public_repos4
account_age_days992

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history23 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesDotMake.CommandLine
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://dotmake.build/command-line/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics18 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscli, command-line, commandlineparser, console, csharp, dotnet, source-generator, system-commandline, dotmake, dotnet-core, dotnet-standard, dotnet-suggest, posix, terminal, completions, dotnet-cli, dotnet-console, csharp-sourcegenerator
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://dotmake.build/command-line/
docs_sitehttps://dotmake.build/command-line/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 3/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
1.5/7.5Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages8
unassessed_packages3
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 8 resolved dependencies against OSV. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

38Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.1/40Legible commit history49 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.49
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/DotMake.CommandLine.SourceGeneration.Embedded/DotMake.CommandLine.SourceGeneration.Embedded.csproj, src/DotMake.CommandLine.SourceGeneration/DotMake.CommandLine.SourceGeneration.csproj, src/DotMake.CommandLine.Tests.TUnit/DotMake.CommandLine.Tests.TUnit.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/DotMake.CommandLine.SourceGeneration.Embedded/DotMake.CommandLine.SourceGeneration.Embedded.csproj, src/DotMake.CommandLine.SourceGeneration/DotMake.CommandLine.SourceGeneration.csproj, src/DotMake.CommandLine.Tests.TUnit/DotMake.CommandLine.Tests.TUnit.csproj, src/DotMake.CommandLine.Tests/DotMake.CommandLine.Tests.csproj, src/DotMake.CommandLine/DotMake.CommandLine.csproj, src/TestApp.Nuget/TestApp.Nuget.csproj, src/TestApp.NugetAot/TestApp.NugetAot.csproj, src/TestApp.NugetDI/TestApp.NugetDI.csproj, src/TestApp.NugetNoRef/TestApp.NugetNoRef.csproj, src/TestApp/TestApp.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes1/281 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes62,064
source_files_sampled281
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

168GitHub stars
9contributors
34commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
57releases
1bus factor
9open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 15 ⇿
0Stars
15Forks
40Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151522024-012025-032026-05
Major 2Minor 14Patch 24

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-23 01:59 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
2Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 14
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection2.1.1src/DotMake.CommandLine.SourceGeneration.Embedded/DotMake.CommandLine.SourceGeneration.Embedded.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.3.1src/DotMake.CommandLine.SourceGeneration/DotMake.CommandLine.SourceGeneration.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers3.3.4src/DotMake.CommandLine.SourceGeneration/DotMake.CommandLine.SourceGeneration.csproj
NuGetTUnit1.*src/DotMake.CommandLine.Tests.TUnit/DotMake.CommandLine.Tests.TUnit.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.0src/DotMake.CommandLine.Tests/DotMake.CommandLine.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.8.0src/DotMake.CommandLine.Tests/DotMake.CommandLine.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.5.3src/DotMake.CommandLine.Tests/DotMake.CommandLine.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.5.3src/DotMake.CommandLine.Tests/DotMake.CommandLine.Tests.csproj
NuGetSystem.CommandLine[2.0.11,3.0.0)src/DotMake.CommandLine/DotMake.CommandLine.csproj
NuGetDotMake.CommandLine$(Version)src/TestApp.Nuget/TestApp.Nuget.csproj
NuGetDotMake.CommandLine$(Version)src/TestApp.NugetAot/TestApp.NugetAot.csproj
NuGetDotMake.CommandLine$(Version)src/TestApp.NugetDI/TestApp.NugetDI.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection6.0.0src/TestApp.NugetDI/TestApp.NugetDI.csproj
NuGetDotMake.CommandLine$(Version)src/TestApp.NugetNoRef/TestApp.NugetNoRef.csproj
All dependencies 11

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.0direct
NuGetDotMake.CommandLinedirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers3.3.4direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.3.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection2.1.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection6.0.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.8.0direct
NuGetSystem.CommandLinedirect
NuGetTUnitdirect
NuGetxunit2.5.3direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.5.3direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 8 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.