Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 04:11 UTC

dotnet / command-line-api

Command line parsing, invocation, and rendering of terminal output.

C# · Shell · PowerShellMIT★ 3,673 stars⑂ 429 forkssince Apr 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

dotnet/command-line-api holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (89/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (62/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

.NET PlatformOrganization · verified domain
23,336 followers278 public repossince Oct 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
NuGetdotnet-suggestpoints to another repo — not scored2.0.12-310 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

73Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
16.6/36Commit cadence — 24/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 118 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year118
human_commit_share0.74
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year24
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 15 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 238 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~154.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tagv2.0.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release238
mean_days_between_releases154.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

89Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
57.8/60Stars — 3,673 stars
21.9/25Forks — 429 forks
13.2/15Watchers — 240 watchers
Inputs used
forks429
stars3,673
watchers240
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesdev.azure.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 65% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 97 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 38 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled97
top_contributor_share0.653
How it's scored
29.7/42Issue resolution — 71% of issues closed
25.4/30PR acceptance — 1,057/1,249 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs1,057
open_issues443
closed_issues1,066
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.706
closed_unmerged_prs192
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 23,336 followers of dotnet
25/25Track record — 278 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers23,336
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logindotnet
public_repos278
account_age_days4,351

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/dotnet/command-line-api/wiki
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 9 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscommand-line, parser, parsing, terminal, posix, completions, commandlineparser, system-commandline, dotnet-suggest
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://github.com/dotnet/command-line-api/wiki
docs_sitehttps://github.com/dotnet/command-line-api/wiki
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 38 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — eng/common/AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
36/40Legible commit history — 50 of 74 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.676
agent_instruction_fileseng/common/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes326
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — eng/common/internal/Tools.csproj, src/System.CommandLine.ApiCompatibility.Tests/System.CommandLine.ApiCompatibility.Tests.csproj, src/System.CommandLine.Benchmarks/System.CommandLine.Benchmarks.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 13 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.13
toolchain_manifestseng/common/internal/Tools.csproj, src/System.CommandLine.ApiCompatibility.Tests/System.CommandLine.ApiCompatibility.Tests.csproj, src/System.CommandLine.Benchmarks/System.CommandLine.Benchmarks.csproj, src/System.CommandLine.StaticCompletions.Tests/System.CommandLine.StaticCompletions.Tests.csproj, src/System.CommandLine.StaticCompletions/System.CommandLine.StaticCompletions.csproj, src/System.CommandLine.Suggest.Tests/EndToEndTestApp/EndToEndTestApp.csproj, src/System.CommandLine.Suggest.Tests/dotnet-suggest.Tests.csproj, src/System.CommandLine.Suggest/dotnet-suggest.csproj, src/System.CommandLine.Tests/System.CommandLine.Tests.csproj, src/System.CommandLine.Tests/TestApps/NativeAOT/NativeAOT.csproj, src/System.CommandLine.Tests/TestApps/NativeLibrary/NativeLibrary.csproj, src/System.CommandLine.Tests/TestApps/Trimming/Trimming.csproj, src/System.CommandLine/System.CommandLine.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/201 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes59,355
source_files_sampled201
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

3,673GitHub stars
97contributors
118commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
15releases
1bus factor
443open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • nuget package 'dotnet-suggest' points at a different repository (https://github.com/dotnet/dotnet); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 429 ⇿
0Stars
429Forks
15Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010020030040050042662018-122022-102026-08
Major 1Minor 0Patch 2

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10
6.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 04:10 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 38 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetApprovalTests—src/System.CommandLine.ApiCompatibility.Tests/System.CommandLine.ApiCompatibility.Tests.csproj
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet—src/System.CommandLine.Benchmarks/System.CommandLine.Benchmarks.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Scripting—src/System.CommandLine.Benchmarks/System.CommandLine.Benchmarks.csproj
NuGetVerify.Xunit—src/System.CommandLine.StaticCompletions.Tests/System.CommandLine.StaticCompletions.Tests.csproj
NuGetVerify.DiffPlex—src/System.CommandLine.StaticCompletions.Tests/System.CommandLine.StaticCompletions.Tests.csproj
NuGetAwesomeAssertions—src/System.CommandLine.StaticCompletions.Tests/System.CommandLine.StaticCompletions.Tests.csproj
NuGetAwesomeAssertions—src/System.CommandLine.Suggest.Tests/dotnet-suggest.Tests.csproj
NuGetApprovalTests—src/System.CommandLine.Tests/System.CommandLine.Tests.csproj
NuGetAwesomeAssertions—src/System.CommandLine.Tests/System.CommandLine.Tests.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json—src/System.CommandLine.Tests/System.CommandLine.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.DotNet.PlatformAbstractions—src/System.CommandLine.Tests/System.CommandLine.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.Memory—src/System.CommandLine.Tests/System.CommandLine.Tests.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory—src/System.CommandLine/System.CommandLine.csproj
All dependencies 15

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 5 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetApprovalTests—direct
NuGetAwesomeAssertions—direct
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.Memory—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Scripting—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.DotNet.PlatformAbstractions—direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json—direct
NuGetSystem.Memory—direct
NuGetVerify.DiffPlex—direct
NuGetVerify.Xunit—direct
NuGetDrop.App—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.DotNet.IBCMerge—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.ManifestTool.CrossPlatform—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudioEng.MicroBuild.Core—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudioEng.MicroBuild.Plugins.SwixBuild—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.