Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 21:26 UTC

dotnet / razor

Compiler and tooling experience for Razor ASP.NET Core apps in Visual Studio and VS Code.

No license detected★ 708 stars⑂ 239 forkssince Nov 2018View on GitHub ↗
#aspnet#hacktoberfest

dotnet/razor holds a health index of 48 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (66/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (1/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

48
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

48
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 49 is calibrated to 48 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

.NET PlatformOrganization
22,989 followers278 public repossince Oct 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

52Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

52Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
1.4/36Commit cadence — 2/52 weeks with commits
4.3/18Commit volume — 2 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year2
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year2

Release discipline

52Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 42 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 1,194 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~70.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count42
latest_release_tagv7.0.0-preview.23167.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,194
mean_days_between_releases70.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

75Good
How it's scored
46.2/60Stars — 708 stars
19.8/25Forks — 239 forks
8.9/15Watchers — 41 watchers
Inputs used
forks239
stars708
watchers41
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

23At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 50% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.5

Issue & PR responsiveness

85Excellent
How it's scored
38.3/42Issue resolution — 91% of issues closed
28.1/30PR acceptance — 7,952/8,489 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs7,952
open_issues393
closed_issues4,064
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.912
closed_unmerged_prs537
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach — 22,989 followers of dotnet
25/25Track record — 278 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers22,989
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_logindotnet
public_repos278
account_age_days4,299
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

40Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

24At Risk
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://asp.net
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsaspnet, hacktoberfest
has_wikino
homepagehttps://asp.net
docs_sitehttps://asp.net
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

40Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

40Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

1Critical · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

1Critical
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

708GitHub stars
2contributors
2commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
42releases
1bus factor
393open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Language breakdown unavailable

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-18 21:26 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 1/2 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained2 commit(s) and 29 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 91

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 91 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBasic.Reference.Assemblies.AspNet80—indirect
NuGetBasic.Reference.Assemblies.Net80—indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet—indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet.Diagnostics.Windows—indirect
NuGetDiffPlex—indirect
NuGetDrop.App—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.$(NetCoreSDKRuntimeIdentifier)—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Framework—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Locator—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Utilities.Core—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzer.Testing—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Common—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Analyzer.Testing—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.EditorFeatures—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Features—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.EditorFeatures—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.EditorFeatures.Common—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.ExternalAccess.FSharp—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.ExternalAccess.Razor.EditorFeatures—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.ExternalAccess.Razor.Features—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.LanguageServer.Protocol—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Remote.ServiceHub—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Test.Utilities—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.Common—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CSharp—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.DiaSymReader—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.DotNet.IBCMerge—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyModel—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.ObjectPool—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Guardian.Cli0.199.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Internal.VisualStudio.Interop—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Internal.VisualStudio.Shell.Framework—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.IO.Redist—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.ManifestTool.CrossPlatform—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Sdk.Razor—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Sdk.Razor.SourceGenerators.Transport—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Playwright—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Copilot—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Editor—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Extensibility.Testing.SourceGenerator—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Extensibility.Testing.Xunit—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Language.Intellisense—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.LanguageServer.Client.Implementation—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.LanguageServer.Protocol—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.LanguageServer.Protocol.Extensions—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.LanguageServer.Protocol.Internal—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.LanguageServices—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.LanguageServices.CSharp.Symbols—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.LanguageServices.Implementation.Symbols—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.LiveShare—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.ProjectSystem.Sdk—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.RpcContracts—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Shell.15.0—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Shell.Framework—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Text.Data—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Text.Implementation—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Text.Logic—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Threading—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Validation—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Web—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudioEng.MicroBuild.Core—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudioEng.MicroBuild.Plugins.SwixBuild—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.WebTools.Languages.Html—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.WebTools.Languages.Html.Editor—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.WebTools.Languages.LanguageServer.Server—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.WebTools.Languages.Shared—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.WebTools.Languages.Shared.Editor—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.WebTools.Languages.Shared.VS—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.WebTools.Shared—indirect
NuGetMoq—indirect
NuGetNerdbank.Streams—indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json—indirect
NuGetNuGet.VisualStudio—indirect
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable—indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.DiagnosticSource—indirect
NuGetSystem.Resources.Extensions—indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Xml—indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Encodings.Web—indirect
NuGetxunit—indirect
NuGetxunit.analyzers—indirect
NuGetxunit.assert—indirect
NuGetXunit.Combinatorial—indirect
NuGetxunit.extensibility.execution—indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.console—indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.utility—indirect
NuGetXunit.StaFact—indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with dotnet/razor. Read them side by side →

100dotnet/runtime.NET is a cross-platform runtime for cloud, mobile, desktop, and IoT apps.Exceptional100carbon-design-system/carbonA design system built by IBMExceptional100Azure/azure-sdk-for-jsThis repository is for active development of the Azure SDK for JavaScript (NodeJS & Browser). For consumers of the SDK we recommend visiting our public developer docs at https://docs.microsoft.com/javascript/azure/ or our versioned developer docs at https://azure.github.io/azure-sdk-for-js. Exceptional100mattermost/mattermostMattermost is an open source platform for secure collaboration across the entire software development lifecycle..Exceptional100pingcap/tidbTiDB is built for agentic workloads that grow unpredictably, with ACID guarantees and native support for transactions, analytics, and vector search. No data silos. No noisy neighbors. No infrastructure ceiling.Exceptional100containerd/containerdAn open and reliable container runtimeExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.