Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-12 20:41 UTC

dottxt-ai / outlines

Structured Outputs

PythonApache-2.0★ 15,586 stars⑂ 852 forkssince Mar 2023View on GitHub ↗

dottxt-ai/outlines holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Security (59/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

96
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

96
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 83 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

.txtOrganization
338 followers15 public repossince Aug 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIoutlines1.3.3-846 days agomachine-learningdeep-learninglanguage-modelsstructured-generation

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
28.4/36Commit cadence41/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume243 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year243
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year41

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases90 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 6 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~31.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count90
latest_release_tag1.3.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases31.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

83Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars15,586 stars
24.4/25Forks852 forks
9.6/15Watchers55 watchers
Inputs used
forks852
stars15,586
watchers55
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

80Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 41% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 33 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.41
How it's scored
37.6/42Issue resolution90% of issues closed
24.9/30PR acceptance720/868 decided PRs merged
10.6/13Newcomer PR acceptance13/16 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 23/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs720
open_issues94
closed_issues803
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d28
prs_decided_30d36
issue_closed_ratio0.895
closed_unmerged_prs148
first_time_authors_30d10
first_time_prs_merged_30d13
first_time_prs_decided_30d16
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
18.2/25Owner reach338 followers of dottxt-ai
14.8/25Track record15 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers338
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logindottxt-ai
public_repos15
account_age_days1,094
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 6 days ago
20/20Version history84 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesoutlines
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish6

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests24 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://dottxt-ai.github.io/outlines/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgenerative-ai, llms, prompt-engineering, symbolic-ai, cfg, json, regex, structured-generation
has_wikino
homepagehttps://dottxt-ai.github.io/outlines/
docs_sitehttps://dottxt-ai.github.io/outlines/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests24 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 23/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 33 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities131 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
26.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: diskcache 5.6.3 (moderate)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
37.2/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 181 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages1
assessed_packages17
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitymoderate 1
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the pypi:outlines@1.3.3 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 17 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsdocs/features/models/gemini.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
33.1/40Legible commit history62 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.62
agent_instruction_filesdocs/features/models/gemini.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,461
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingsrc/outlines/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environmentdevcontainer, Nix, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice9 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/outlines/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.09
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codePython with type-check config (src/outlines/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/122 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes44,704
source_files_sampled122
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples, notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, notebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

15,586GitHub stars
100contributors
243commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
90releases
2bus factor
94open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 23 authors (cap 12)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 852 ⇿
0Stars
852Forks
90Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02004006008001,000849322023-052024-122026-08
Major 1Minor 5Patch 84

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-12 20:40 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests24 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 23/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 33 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities131 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIjinja2pyproject.toml
PyPIcloudpicklepyproject.toml
PyPIdiskcachepyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIjsonschemapyproject.toml
PyPIpillowpyproject.toml
PyPItyping_extensionspyproject.toml
PyPIoutlines_core==0.2.14pyproject.toml
PyPIgensonpyproject.toml
All dependencies 213

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 204 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIcloudpickle3.1.2direct
PyPIdiskcache5.6.3direct
PyPIgenson1.3.0direct
PyPIjinja23.1.6direct
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0direct
PyPIoutlines-core0.2.14direct
PyPIpillow12.0.0direct
PyPIpydantic2.12.4direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0direct
PyPIabsl-py2.3.1indirect
PyPIaccelerate0.27.2indirect
PyPIaccelerate1.12.0indirect
PyPIaiofiles25.1.0indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.1indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.13.2indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIairportsdata20250909indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanthropic0.74.1indirect
PyPIanyio4.11.0indirect
PyPIastunparse1.6.3indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs25.4.0indirect
PyPIbackports-asyncio-runner1.2.0indirect
PyPIbeartype0.15.0indirect
PyPIbentomlindirect
PyPIcachetools6.2.2indirect
PyPIcertifi2025.11.12indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIchardet5.2.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.4indirect
PyPIchex0.1.90indirect
PyPIchex0.1.91indirect
PyPIclick8.2.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.12.0indirect
PyPIdatasets2.18.0indirect
PyPIdatasets4.4.1indirect
PyPIdiff-cover9.7.2indirect
PyPIdill0.4.0indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.17.0indirect
PyPIdottxt0.2.0indirect
PyPIetils1.13.0indirect
PyPIeval-type-backport0.3.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.20.0indirect
PyPIflatbuffers25.9.23indirect
PyPIflax0.10.7indirect
PyPIflax0.12.1indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2025.10.0indirect
PyPIgast0.6.0indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth2.43.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-genai1.52.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-pasta0.2.0indirect
PyPIgrpcio1.76.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIh5py3.15.1indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.2.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhttpx-ws0.8.2indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub0.36.0indirect
PyPIhumanize4.14.0indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.15indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIimportlib-resources6.5.2indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIinvoke2.2.1indirect
PyPIiso31662.1.1indirect
PyPIjax0.6.2indirect
PyPIjax0.8.1indirect
PyPIjaxlib0.6.2indirect
PyPIjaxlib0.8.1indirect
PyPIjiter0.12.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIkeras3.12.0indirect
PyPIlibclang18.1.1indirect
PyPIllama-cpp-python0.3.16indirect
PyPIllguidance1.4.0indirect
PyPIllvmlite0.45.1indirect
PyPIlmstudio1.5.0indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImikeindirect
PyPImistralai1.9.11indirect
PyPImkdocsindirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-gen-filesindirect
PyPImkdocs-gen-files0.6.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-git-committers-plugin-2indirect
PyPImkdocs-git-revision-date-localized-pluginindirect
PyPImkdocs-literate-navindirect
PyPImkdocs-materialindirect
PyPImkdocs-mermaid2-pluginindirect
PyPImkdocs-redirectsindirect
PyPImkdocs-section-indexindirect
PyPImkdocstringsindirect
PyPIml-dtypes0.5.4indirect
PyPImlx0.30.0indirect
PyPImlx-lm0.28.3indirect
PyPImlx-metal0.30.0indirect
PyPImpmath1.3.0indirect
PyPImsgpack1.1.2indirect
PyPImsgspec0.20.0indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.0indirect
PyPImultiprocess0.70.18indirect
PyPInamex0.1.0indirect
PyPInest-asyncio1.6.0indirect
PyPInetworkx3.4.2indirect
PyPInetworkx3.6indirect
PyPIninja1.13.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.9.1indirect
PyPInumba0.62.1indirect
PyPInumpy2.1.3indirect
PyPInvidia-cublas-cu1212.8.4.1indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-cupti-cu1212.8.90indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-nvrtc-cu1212.8.93indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-runtime-cu1212.8.90indirect
PyPInvidia-cudnn-cu129.10.2.21indirect
PyPInvidia-cufft-cu1211.3.3.83indirect
PyPInvidia-cufile-cu121.13.1.3indirect
PyPInvidia-curand-cu1210.3.9.90indirect
PyPInvidia-cusolver-cu1211.7.3.90indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparse-cu1212.5.8.93indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparselt-cu120.7.1indirect
PyPInvidia-nccl-cu122.27.5indirect
PyPInvidia-nvjitlink-cu1212.8.93indirect
PyPInvidia-nvshmem-cu123.3.20indirect
PyPInvidia-nvtx-cu1212.8.90indirect
PyPIollama0.6.1indirect
PyPIopenai2.33.0indirect
PyPIopt-einsum3.4.0indirect
PyPIoptax0.2.6indirect
PyPIoptree0.18.0indirect
PyPIorbax-checkpoint0.11.28indirect
PyPIoutlines0.0.37indirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIpandas2.3.3indirect
PyPIpathspec0.12.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.5.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.5.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.4.1indirect
PyPIprotobuf6.33.1indirect
PyPIpsutil7.1.3indirect
PyPIpyarrow22.0.0indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.1indirect
PyPIpyasn1-modules0.4.2indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpygments2.19.2indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.3.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.0.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.15.1indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpytz2025.2indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2025.11.3indirect
PyPIrequests2.32.5indirect
PyPIresponses0.25.8indirect
PyPIrich14.2.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.29.0indirect
PyPIrsa4.9.1indirect
PyPIsafetensors0.7.0indirect
PyPIscipy1.15.3indirect
PyPIscipy1.16.3indirect
PyPIsentencepiece0.2.1indirect
PyPIsetuptools80.9.0indirect
PyPIsimplejson3.20.2indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsympy1.14.0indirect
PyPItenacity9.1.2indirect
PyPItensorboard2.20.0indirect
PyPItensorboard-data-server0.7.2indirect
PyPItensorflow2.20.0indirect
PyPItensorstore0.1.78indirect
PyPItensorstore0.1.79indirect
PyPItermcolor3.2.0indirect
PyPItf-keras2.20.1indirect
PyPItokenizers0.22.1indirect
PyPItomli2.3.0indirect
PyPItoolz1.1.0indirect
PyPItorch2.9.0indirect
PyPItqdm4.67.1indirect
PyPItransformers4.38.2indirect
PyPItransformers4.57.1indirect
PyPItreescope0.1.10indirect
PyPItriton3.5.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2025.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.5.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv20.35.4indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets15.0.1indirect
PyPIwerkzeug3.1.3indirect
PyPIwheel0.45.1indirect
PyPIwrapt2.0.1indirect
PyPIwsproto1.3.2indirect
PyPIxgrammar0.1.27indirect
PyPIxxhash3.6.0indirect
PyPIyarl1.22.0indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing pypi:outlines@1.3.3 pulls in 17 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
diskcache5.6.3directmoderate2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.