Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-23 19:54 UTC

doyoubi / undermoon

Mordern Redis Cluster solution for easy operation.

RustApache-2.0★ 702 stars⑂ 37 forkssince Sep 2018View on GitHub ↗

KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

#redis #redis-cluster #rust #proxy #slot #migration #redis-clusters #redis-instances #redis-protocol #redis-proxy #failover #scale #redis-cloud #cloud #kubernetes #k8s #redis-cluster-protocol

doyoubi/undermoon holds a health index of 26 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (63/100) and lowest on Vitality (21/100). It was last updated 1210 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 46 is calibrated to 44 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

doyoubiPersonal account

157 followers57 public repossince Apr 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/doyoubi/undermoon	v0.6.2	-	29	1377 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

21At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical

Abandonment alert

Work has arrived and nobody has attended to it

no human commit in 1386 daysautomated commits excludedpull requests left unansweredissues left unanswereda published fix left unappliedreleases stalledOpenSSF Scorecard reports it unmaintainedOverall rating: At Risk ceiling

Silence alone is never the finding — a small, finished library may need no commits for years. This alert requires both: no human commit for a long time, and obligations the project is visibly not discharging. Automated commits do not count as maintenance.

How abandonment is assessed

How it's scored

0/36	Push recency — last push 1,210 days ago
0/36	Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18	Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	0
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	1,210
active_weeks_last_year	0

Release discipline

52Moderate

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 30 releases published
0/36	Release recency — latest release 1,377 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~71.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	30
latest_release_tag	v0.6.2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	1,377
mean_days_between_releases	71.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

65Good

How it's scored

46.2/60	Stars — 702 stars
13/25	Forks — 37 forks
6.2/15	Watchers — 14 watchers

Inputs used

forks	37
stars	702
watchers	14
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

51Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
4.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	3
top_contributor_share	0.996

Issue & PR responsiveness

70Good

How it's scored

31.3/42	Issue resolution — 75% of issues closed
29.2/30	PR acceptance — 260/267 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	260
open_issues	17
closed_issues	50
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	0.746
closed_unmerged_prs	7
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

63Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
15.8/25	Owner reach — 157 followers of doyoubi
24.8/25	Track record — 57 public repos, account ~13 yr old

Inputs used

followers	157
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	doyoubi
public_repos	57
account_age_days	4,837

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

69Good

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
4/35	Publish recency — latest publish 1,377 days ago
20/20	Version history — 29 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/doyoubi/undermoon
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	1,377

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

63Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

48Weak

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

85Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 17 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	redis, redis-cluster, rust, proxy, slot, migration, redis-clusters, redis-instances, redis-protocol, redis-proxy, failover, scale, redis-cloud, cloud, kubernetes, k8s, redis-cluster-protocol
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

36Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

32At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 90 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	3.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

50Moderate

How it's scored

11.3/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 4 affected: warp 0.3.2 (high), bytes 1.2.1 (moderate 6.2), tokio 1.20.1 (moderate 5.4), +1 more
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
26/40	No advisories left outstanding — 4 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,651 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	82
affected_packages	24
assessed_packages	235
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 4, moderate 8, low 3, unknown 8
direct_affected_packages	4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 235 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

52Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

21At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
20.8/40	Legible commit history — 39 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.39
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

61Moderate

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Cargo.lock, go.sum
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml, clienttest/golang/go.mod, clienttest/java/app/build.gradle.kts
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
53.9/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/100 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	83,373
source_files_sampled	100
oversized_source_files	2

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

702GitHub stars

3contributors

0commits, last 12 months

1,210days since last push

30releases

1bus factor

17open issues

crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch crates package 'undermoon' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 37 ⇿

0Stars

37Forks

22Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 5Patch 9

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.2 / 10

3.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-23 19:53 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0	Contributors	project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	90 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 45

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	bytes	`1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	tokio	`1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	tokio-util	`0.7`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	tokio-stream	`0.1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	warp	`0.3`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	futures	`0.3`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	crc16	`0.4`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	crc64	`2`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	caseless	`0.2`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	arc-swap	`1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	reqwest	`0.11`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde	`1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde_derive	`1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde_json	`1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	log	`0.4`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	env_logger	`0.9`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	scopeguard	`1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	itertools	`0.10`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	futures-batch	`0.6.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	config	`0.13`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	btoi	`0.4`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	crossbeam	`0.8`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	crossbeam-channel	`0.5`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	chrono	`0.4`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	atoi	`1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	zstd	`0.11`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	memchr	`2`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	pin-project	`1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	string-error	`0.1.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	dashmap	`5`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	coarsetime	`0.1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	arrayvec	`0.5`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	either	`1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	mockall	`0.11`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	backtrace	`0.3`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	jemallocator	`0.5`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	async-trait	`0.1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	derivative	`2`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	flate2	`1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	base64	`0.13`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	parking_lot	`0.12`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	lazy_static	`1`	Cargo.toml
Go	github.com/go-redis/redis/v8	`v8.4.11`	clienttest/golang/go.mod
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.7.0`	clienttest/golang/go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.0.0-20180314180146-1d60e4601c6f`	clienttest/golang/go.mod

All dependencies 235

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 46 direct and 189 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	arc-swap	`1.5.1`	direct
crates.io	arrayvec	`0.5.2`	direct
crates.io	async-trait	`0.1.57`	direct
crates.io	atoi	`1.0.0`	direct
crates.io	backtrace	`0.3.66`	direct
crates.io	base64	`0.13.0`	direct
crates.io	btoi	`0.4.2`	direct
crates.io	bytes	`1.2.1`	direct
crates.io	caseless	`0.2.1`	direct
crates.io	chrono	`0.4.20`	direct
crates.io	coarsetime	`0.1.22`	direct
crates.io	config	`0.13.2`	direct
crates.io	crc16	`0.4.0`	direct
crates.io	crc64	`2.0.0`	direct
crates.io	crossbeam	`0.8.2`	direct
crates.io	crossbeam-channel	`0.5.6`	direct
crates.io	dashmap	`5.3.4`	direct
crates.io	derivative	`2.2.0`	direct
crates.io	either	`1.7.0`	direct
crates.io	env_logger	`0.9.0`	direct
crates.io	flate2	`1.0.24`	direct
crates.io	futures	`0.3.21`	direct
crates.io	futures-batch	`0.6.0`	direct
crates.io	itertools	`0.10.3`	direct
crates.io	jemallocator	`0.5.0`	direct
crates.io	lazy_static	`1.4.0`	direct
crates.io	log	`0.4.17`	direct
crates.io	memchr	`2.5.0`	direct
crates.io	mockall	`0.11.2`	direct
crates.io	parking_lot	`0.12.1`	direct
crates.io	pin-project	`1.0.11`	direct
crates.io	reqwest	`0.11.11`	direct
crates.io	scopeguard	`1.1.0`	direct
crates.io	serde	`1.0.142`	direct
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.142`	direct
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.83`	direct
crates.io	string-error	`0.1.0`	direct
crates.io	tokio	`1.20.1`	direct
crates.io	tokio-stream	`0.1.9`	direct
crates.io	tokio-util	`0.6.10`	direct
crates.io	tokio-util	`0.7.3`	direct
crates.io	warp	`0.3.2`	direct
crates.io	zstd	`0.11.2+zstd.1.5.2`	direct
Go	github.com/go-redis/redis/v8	`8.4.11`	direct
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`1.7.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`0.0.0-20180314180146-1d60e4601c6f`	direct
crates.io	addr2line	`0.17.0`	indirect
crates.io	adler	`1.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	aho-corasick	`0.7.18`	indirect
crates.io	alloc-no-stdlib	`2.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	alloc-stdlib	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	async-compression	`0.3.14`	indirect
crates.io	atty	`0.2.14`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`1.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	block-buffer	`0.10.2`	indirect
crates.io	block-buffer	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	brotli	`3.3.4`	indirect
crates.io	brotli-decompressor	`2.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	buf_redux	`0.8.4`	indirect
crates.io	bumpalo	`3.10.0`	indirect
crates.io	byteorder	`1.4.3`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.0.73`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation	`0.9.3`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation-sys	`0.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	cpufeatures	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	crc32fast	`1.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-deque	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.10`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-queue	`0.3.6`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-utils	`0.8.11`	indirect
crates.io	crypto-common	`0.1.6`	indirect
crates.io	difflib	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	digest	`0.10.3`	indirect
crates.io	digest	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	downcast	`0.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	encoding_rs	`0.8.31`	indirect
crates.io	fastrand	`1.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	float-cmp	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	fnv	`1.0.7`	indirect
crates.io	foreign-types	`0.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	foreign-types-shared	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	form_urlencoded	`1.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	fragile	`1.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	fs_extra	`1.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	futures-channel	`0.3.21`	indirect
crates.io	futures-core	`0.3.21`	indirect
crates.io	futures-executor	`0.3.21`	indirect
crates.io	futures-io	`0.3.21`	indirect
crates.io	futures-macro	`0.3.21`	indirect
crates.io	futures-sink	`0.3.21`	indirect
crates.io	futures-task	`0.3.21`	indirect
crates.io	futures-timer	`2.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	futures-util	`0.3.21`	indirect
crates.io	generic-array	`0.14.6`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.2.7`	indirect
crates.io	gimli	`0.26.2`	indirect
crates.io	h2	`0.3.13`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.12.3`	indirect
crates.io	headers	`0.3.7`	indirect
crates.io	headers-core	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	hermit-abi	`0.1.19`	indirect
crates.io	http	`0.2.8`	indirect
crates.io	http-body	`0.4.5`	indirect
crates.io	httparse	`1.7.1`	indirect
crates.io	httpdate	`1.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	humantime	`2.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	hyper	`0.14.20`	indirect
crates.io	hyper-tls	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	idna	`0.2.3`	indirect
crates.io	indexmap	`1.9.1`	indirect
crates.io	instant	`0.1.12`	indirect
crates.io	ipnet	`2.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	jemalloc-sys	`0.5.1+5.3.0-patched`	indirect
crates.io	jobserver	`0.1.24`	indirect
crates.io	js-sys	`0.3.59`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.127`	indirect
crates.io	lock_api	`0.4.7`	indirect
crates.io	matches	`0.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	memoffset	`0.6.5`	indirect
crates.io	mime	`0.3.16`	indirect
crates.io	mime_guess	`2.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	minimal-lexical	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	miniz_oxide	`0.5.3`	indirect
crates.io	mio	`0.8.4`	indirect
crates.io	mockall_derive	`0.11.2`	indirect
crates.io	multipart	`0.18.0`	indirect
crates.io	native-tls	`0.2.10`	indirect
crates.io	nom	`7.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	normalize-line-endings	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	num-integer	`0.1.45`	indirect
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.15`	indirect
crates.io	num_cpus	`1.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	object	`0.29.0`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	opaque-debug	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	openssl	`0.10.41`	indirect
crates.io	openssl-macros	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	openssl-probe	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	openssl-sys	`0.9.75`	indirect
crates.io	parking_lot_core	`0.9.3`	indirect
crates.io	pathdiff	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	percent-encoding	`2.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	pin-project-internal	`1.0.11`	indirect
crates.io	pin-project-lite	`0.2.9`	indirect
crates.io	pin-utils	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	pkg-config	`0.3.25`	indirect
crates.io	ppv-lite86	`0.2.16`	indirect
crates.io	predicates	`2.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	predicates-core	`1.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	predicates-tree	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.43`	indirect
crates.io	quick-error	`1.2.3`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.21`	indirect
crates.io	rand	`0.8.5`	indirect
crates.io	rand_chacha	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	rand_core	`0.6.3`	indirect
crates.io	redox_syscall	`0.2.16`	indirect
crates.io	regex	`1.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.6.27`	indirect
crates.io	remove_dir_all	`0.5.3`	indirect
crates.io	rustc-demangle	`0.1.21`	indirect
crates.io	ryu	`1.0.11`	indirect
crates.io	safemem	`0.3.3`	indirect
crates.io	schannel	`0.1.20`	indirect
crates.io	scoped-tls	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	security-framework	`2.6.1`	indirect
crates.io	security-framework-sys	`2.6.1`	indirect
crates.io	serde_urlencoded	`0.7.1`	indirect
crates.io	sha-1	`0.10.0`	indirect
crates.io	sha-1	`0.9.8`	indirect
crates.io	signal-hook-registry	`1.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	slab	`0.4.7`	indirect
crates.io	smallvec	`1.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	socket2	`0.4.4`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`1.0.99`	indirect
crates.io	tempfile	`3.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	termcolor	`1.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	termtree	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`1.0.32`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`1.0.32`	indirect
crates.io	time	`0.1.44`	indirect
crates.io	tinyvec	`1.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	tinyvec_macros	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	tokio-macros	`1.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	tokio-native-tls	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	tokio-tungstenite	`0.15.0`	indirect
crates.io	toml	`0.5.9`	indirect
crates.io	tower-service	`0.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	tracing	`0.1.36`	indirect
crates.io	tracing-core	`0.1.29`	indirect
crates.io	try-lock	`0.2.3`	indirect
crates.io	tungstenite	`0.14.0`	indirect
crates.io	twoway	`0.1.8`	indirect
crates.io	typenum	`1.15.0`	indirect
crates.io	undermoon	`0.6.2`	indirect
crates.io	unicase	`2.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-bidi	`0.3.8`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-normalization	`0.1.21`	indirect
crates.io	url	`2.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	utf-8	`0.7.6`	indirect
crates.io	vcpkg	`0.2.15`	indirect
crates.io	version_check	`0.9.4`	indirect
crates.io	want	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.10.0+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.11.0+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen	`0.2.82`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-backend	`0.2.82`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-futures	`0.4.32`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro	`0.2.82`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro-support	`0.2.82`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-shared	`0.2.82`	indirect
crates.io	web-sys	`0.3.59`	indirect
crates.io	winapi	`0.3.9`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-util	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.36.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.36.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.36.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.36.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.36.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.36.1`	indirect
crates.io	winreg	`0.10.1`	indirect
crates.io	zstd-safe	`5.0.2+zstd.1.5.2`	indirect
crates.io	zstd-sys	`2.0.1+zstd.1.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`2.11.3`	indirect
PyPI	loguru	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	redis	`2.10.6`	indirect
PyPI	redis-py-cluster	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.22.0`	indirect
PyPI	requests-unixsocket	`0.2.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 24

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 235 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 24 carry known advisories, of which 4 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
openssl	`0.10.41`	indirect	critical	23	`0.10.79`
warp	`0.3.2`	direct	high	2	`0.3.3`
jinja2	`2.11.3`	indirect	high	8	`3.1.6`
mio	`0.8.4`	indirect	high	2	`0.8.11`
tungstenite	`0.14.0`	indirect	high	2	`0.20.1`
bytes	`1.2.1`	direct	moderate	2	`1.11.1`
tokio	`1.20.1`	direct	moderate	6	`1.44.2`
bumpalo	`3.10.0`	indirect	moderate	2	`3.11.1`
h2	`0.3.13`	indirect	moderate	6	`0.4.4`
idna	`0.2.3`	indirect	moderate	2	`1.0.0`
loguru	`0.4.1`	indirect	moderate	2	`0.5.3`
requests	`2.22.0`	indirect	moderate	8	`2.33.0`
time	`0.1.44`	indirect	moderate	2	`0.2.23`
atty	`0.2.14`	indirect	low	3	—
rand	`0.8.5`	indirect	low	2	`0.10.1`
remove_dir_all	`0.5.3`	indirect	low	2	`0.8.0`
derivative	`2.2.0`	direct	unknown	1	—
adler	`1.0.2`	indirect	unknown	1	—
buf_redux	`0.8.4`	indirect	unknown	1	—
crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.10`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.9.20`
instant	`0.1.12`	indirect	unknown	1	—
multipart	`0.18.0`	indirect	unknown	1	—
safemem	`0.3.3`	indirect	unknown	1	—
twoway	`0.1.8`	indirect	unknown	1	—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records