Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-08-11 07:31 UTC

dropbox / rust-brotli

Brotli compressor and decompressor written in rust that optionally avoids the stdlib

RustBSD-3-Clause★ 939 stars⑂ 104 forkssince Apr 2016View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryApplicationhow this is determined

dropbox/rust-brotli holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (71/100) and lowest on Vitality (55/100). It was last updated 12 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DropboxOrganization
853 followers247 public repossince Jan 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iobrotli8.0.417,034,1805457 days agobrotlidecompressionhuffmanlz77nostdcompressionno-std
crates.iobrotli-ffi2.0.01106359 days agobrotlidecompressionhuffmanlz77nostdcompressionexternal-ffi-bindingsno-std

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

55Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 12 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
12.2/18Commit volume — 22 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 15 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year22
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push12
active_weeks_last_year8
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 59 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 2,737 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count59
latest_release_tag1.0.110
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2,737
mean_days_between_releases2.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

71Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
48.2/60Stars — 939 stars
16.8/25Forks — 104 forks
7.4/15Watchers — 22 watchers
Inputs used
forks104
stars939
watchers22
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io, travis-ci.org
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 17,034,290 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesbrotli, brotli-ffi
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads233,955,283
monthly_downloads17,034,290
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 87% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 27 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 17 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled27
top_contributor_share0.872
How it's scored
28.4/42Issue resolution — 68% of issues closed
22.5/30PR acceptance — 111/148 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 11/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs111
open_issues26
closed_issues54
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.675
closed_unmerged_prs37
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
21.1/25Owner reach — 853 followers of dropbox
25/25Track record — 247 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers853
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logindropbox
public_repos247
account_age_days5,689

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 57 days ago
20/20Version history — 54 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesbrotli, brotli-ffi
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish57

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://dropbox.tech/infrastructure/-broccoli--syncing-faster-by-syncing-less
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 11 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdecompression, brotli, rust, brotli-decompressor, rustlang, safe, brotli-compression, brotli-encoder, brotli-compressor, compression, compressor
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://dropbox.tech/infrastructure/-broccoli--syncing-faster-by-syncing-less
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.5/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-Review — Found 11/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 17 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 15 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages13
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the crates:brotli@8.0.4 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 13 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
31.2/40Legible commit history — 58 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share0.586
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — c/Makefile, justfile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesc/Makefile, justfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, c/Cargo.toml, c/go/brotli/go.mod, c/go/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
50.8/55Manageable file sizes — 8/105 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes1,871,907
source_files_sampled105
oversized_source_files8
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files

Key facts

939GitHub stars
27contributors
22commits, last 12 months
12days since last push
59releases
1bus factor
26open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 104 ⇿
0Stars
104Forks
59Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02040608010012010352016-042021-062026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 59

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-11 07:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
6CI-Tests7 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 11/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 17 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained15 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioalloc-no-stdlib>=2.0.4, <3Cargo.toml
crates.ioalloc-stdlib~0.2Cargo.toml
crates.iobrotli-decompressor~5.0Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2~0.10Cargo.toml
crates.iobrotli~8.0c/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 6

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 1 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioalloc-no-stdlibdirect
crates.ioalloc-stdlibdirect
crates.iobrotlidirect
crates.iobrotli-decompressordirect
crates.iosha2direct
Gogithub.com/dropbox/rust-brotli/c/go/brotli0.0.0-20220217093550-f3a32293f213indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing crates:brotli@8.0.4 pulls in 13 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.