Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 19:41 UTC

duncanmcclean / statamic-cargo

Comprehensive e-commerce addon for Statamic. Build bespoke e-commerce sites without the complexity.

PHPCustom license★ 37 stars⑂ 9 forkssince Mar 2025View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

#ecommerce #mollie #statamic-addon #stripe

duncanmcclean/statamic-cargo holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (41/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Duncan McCleanPersonal account

212 followers26 public repossince May 2016@statamic

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Packagist	duncanmcclean/statamic-cargo	v1.12.0	4,191	59	3 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

93Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
29.1/36	Commit cadence — 42/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 267 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	267
human_commit_share	0.9
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	42

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 59 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 3 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~7 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	59
latest_release_tag	v1.12.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	3
mean_days_between_releases	7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

41Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

35Weak

How it's scored

25.2/60	Stars — 37 stars
7.5/25	Forks — 9 forks
2.7/15	Watchers — 4 watchers

Inputs used

forks	9
stars	37
watchers	4
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

44Weak

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
16.9/22.5	License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

48Weak

How it's scored

48.3/80	Monthly downloads — 4,191 downloads/month across packagist
0/20	Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	duncanmcclean/statamic-cargo
dependents	0
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	27,248
monthly_downloads	4,191
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

32At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.8/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 96% of commits
12.2/13.5	Contributor breadth — 9 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	9
top_contributor_share	0.964

Issue & PR responsiveness

82Excellent

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
29/30	PR acceptance — 171/177 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	171
open_issues	0
closed_issues	64
prs_merged_7d	4
prs_decided_7d	4
prs_merged_30d	8
prs_decided_30d	8
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	6
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

61Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
16.7/25	Owner reach — 212 followers of duncanmcclean
22.4/25	Track record — 26 public repos, account ~10 yr old

Inputs used

followers	212
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	duncanmcclean
public_repos	26
account_age_days	3,756

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20	Version history — 59 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	duncanmcclean/statamic-cargo
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://builtwithcargo.dev
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 4 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	ecommerce, mollie, statamic-addon, stripe
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://builtwithcargo.dev
docs_site	https://builtwithcargo.dev
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

58Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 12 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	5.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

64Moderate

How it's scored

14/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: postcss 8.5.9 (high 7.5)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33.7/40	No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 139 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	12
affected_packages	5
assessed_packages	123
unassessed_packages	13
affected_by_severity	high 5
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 123 resolved dependencies against OSV. 13 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

43Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://builtwithcargo.dev/llms.txt)
28.4/40	Legible commit history — 48 of 90 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://builtwithcargo.dev/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.533
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

60Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 26 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 10 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.26
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.1

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/391 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	32,925
source_files_sampled	391
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

37GitHub stars

9contributors

267commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

59releases

1bus factor

0open issues

npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 9 ⇿

0Stars

9Forks

40Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 7Patch 19

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10

5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 19:40 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
1	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 1/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
9	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
10	Pinned-Dependencies	all dependencies are pinned
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0	Vulnerabilities	12 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 14

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	laravel/framework	`^12.0 \|\| ^13.0`	composer.json
Packagist	mollie/mollie-api-php	`^3.0`	composer.json
Packagist	moneyphp/money	`^4.5`	composer.json
Packagist	statamic/cms	`^6.20`	composer.json
Packagist	stillat/proteus	`^4.2.1`	composer.json
Packagist	stripe/stripe-php	`^16.4`	composer.json
npm	@statamic/cms	`file:./vendor/statamic/cms/resources/dist-package`	package.json
npm	@tailwindcss/container-queries	`^0.1.1`	package.json
npm	@tailwindcss/typography	`^0.5.13`	package.json
npm	@tailwindcss/vite	`^4.1.8`	package.json
npm	autoprefixer	`^10.4.20`	package.json
npm	postcss	`^8.4.41`	package.json
npm	postcss-import	`^16.1.0`	package.json
npm	tailwindcss	`^4.1.8`	package.json

All dependencies 136

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 122 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@statamic/cms	`0.0.0`	direct
npm	@tailwindcss/container-queries	`0.1.1`	direct
npm	@tailwindcss/typography	`0.5.19`	direct
npm	@tailwindcss/vite	`4.2.2`	direct
npm	autoprefixer	`10.4.27`	direct
npm	postcss	`8.5.9`	direct
npm	postcss-import	`16.1.1`	direct
npm	tailwindcss	`4.2.2`	direct
Packagist	laravel/framework	`—`	direct
Packagist	mollie/mollie-api-php	`—`	direct
Packagist	moneyphp/money	`—`	direct
Packagist	statamic/cms	`—`	direct
Packagist	stillat/proteus	`—`	direct
Packagist	stripe/stripe-php	`—`	direct
npm	@babel/helper-string-parser	`7.27.1`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.28.5`	indirect
npm	@babel/parser	`7.29.2`	indirect
npm	@babel/types	`7.29.0`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/core	`1.9.2`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/runtime	`1.9.2`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/wasi-threads	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/remapping	`2.3.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-runtime	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	@oxc-project/types	`0.124.0`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-android-arm64	`1.0.0-rc.15`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm64	`1.0.0-rc.15`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-x64	`1.0.0-rc.15`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x64	`1.0.0-rc.15`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.0.0-rc.15`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.0.0-rc.15`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl	`1.0.0-rc.15`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.0.0-rc.15`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.0.0-rc.15`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu	`1.0.0-rc.15`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl	`1.0.0-rc.15`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm64	`1.0.0-rc.15`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi	`1.0.0-rc.15`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.0.0-rc.15`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc	`1.0.0-rc.15`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/pluginutils	`1.0.0-rc.13`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/pluginutils	`1.0.0-rc.15`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/forms	`0.5.11`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/node	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-android-arm64	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-arm64	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-x64	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-freebsd-x64	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-musl	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-gnu	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-musl	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-wasm32-wasi	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-x64-msvc	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	@tybys/wasm-util	`0.10.1`	indirect
npm	@vitejs/plugin-vue	`6.0.6`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-core	`3.5.32`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-dom	`3.5.32`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-sfc	`3.5.32`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-ssr	`3.5.32`	indirect
npm	@vue/reactivity	`3.5.32`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-core	`3.5.32`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-dom	`3.5.32`	indirect
npm	@vue/server-renderer	`3.5.32`	indirect
npm	@vue/shared	`3.5.32`	indirect
npm	baseline-browser-mapping	`2.10.18`	indirect
npm	browserslist	`4.28.2`	indirect
npm	caniuse-lite	`1.0.30001787`	indirect
npm	cssesc	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	csstype	`3.2.3`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	electron-to-chromium	`1.5.335`	indirect
npm	enhanced-resolve	`5.20.1`	indirect
npm	entities	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	fraction.js	`5.3.4`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.16.1`	indirect
npm	jiti	`2.6.1`	indirect
npm	laravel-vite-plugin	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	lightningcss	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-android-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-freebsd-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.21`	indirect
npm	mini-svg-data-uri	`1.4.4`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.11`	indirect
npm	node-releases	`2.0.37`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`2.3.2`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	pify	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	postcss-selector-parser	`6.0.10`	indirect
npm	postcss-value-parser	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	read-cache	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.22.12`	indirect
npm	rolldown	`1.0.0-rc.15`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	supports-preserve-symlinks-flag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	tapable	`2.3.2`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.16`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	update-browserslist-db	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	util-deprecate	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	vite	`8.0.8`	indirect
npm	vite-plugin-full-reload	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	vue	`3.5.32`	indirect
Packagist	ext-intl	`—`	indirect
Packagist	ext-zip	`—`	indirect
Packagist	laravel/pint	`1.22.1`	indirect
Packagist	orchestra/testbench	`—`	indirect
Packagist	pestphp/pest	`—`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`—`	indirect
Packagist	spatie/ray	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 123 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 13 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
postcss	`8.5.9`	direct	high	4	`8.5.23`
baseline-browser-mapping	`2.10.18`	indirect	high	1	`2.11.0`
browserslist	`4.28.2`	indirect	high	2	`4.28.7`
nanoid	`3.3.11`	indirect	high	3	`5.1.16`
vite	`8.0.8`	indirect	high	2	`8.0.16`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records