Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 03:01 UTC

eQuantic / core-api

C#MIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2024View on GitHub ↗

eQuantic/core-api holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (67/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (33/100). It was last updated 47 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

eQuantic TechOrganization
4 followers30 public repossince Dec 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGeteQuantic.Core.Api.Client4.0.0-5850 days agoequanticcoreapiclientlibrary
NuGeteQuantic.Core.Api.Error4.0.0-5950 days agoequanticcoreapierrorlibrary
NuGeteQuantic.Core.Api4.0.0-9550 days agoequanticcoreapilibrary

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

61Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 47 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence3/52 weeks with commits
10.8/18Commit volume15 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained14 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year15
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push47
active_weeks_last_year3
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases4 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 50 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~1.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tagv4.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release50
mean_days_between_releases1.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
49.7/80Total downloads60,027 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageseQuantic.Core.Api.Client, eQuantic.Core.Api.Error, eQuantic.Core.Api
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads60,027
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 76% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.765
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance1/1 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
5/25Owner reach4 followers of eQuantic
22.9/25Track record30 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers4
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logineQuantic
public_repos30
account_age_days4,652

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable3 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 50 days ago
20/20Version history95 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageseQuantic.Core.Api.Client, eQuantic.Core.Api.Error, eQuantic.Core.Api
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish50

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained14 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate5.3

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages26
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 26 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
38/40Legible commit history42 of 59 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.712
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsamples/eQuantic.Core.Api.Sample/eQuantic.Core.Api.Sample.csproj, src/eQuantic.Core.Api.Client/eQuantic.Core.Api.Client.csproj, src/eQuantic.Core.Api.Error/eQuantic.Core.Api.Error.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 59
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssamples/eQuantic.Core.Api.Sample/eQuantic.Core.Api.Sample.csproj, src/eQuantic.Core.Api.Client/eQuantic.Core.Api.Client.csproj, src/eQuantic.Core.Api.Error/eQuantic.Core.Api.Error.csproj, src/eQuantic.Core.Api/eQuantic.Core.Api.csproj, tests/eQuantic.Core.Api.Tests/eQuantic.Core.Api.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/31 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes24,171
source_files_sampled31
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplessamples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
2contributors
15commits, last 12 months
47days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
0open issues
package ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
5.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 03:01 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained14 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGeteQuantic.Core.Application4.0.0src/eQuantic.Core.Api/eQuantic.Core.Api.csproj
NuGeteQuantic.Core.Exceptions4.0.0src/eQuantic.Core.Api/eQuantic.Core.Api.csproj
NuGeteQuantic.Linq.Web.Swashbuckle3.7.1src/eQuantic.Core.Api/eQuantic.Core.Api.csproj
NuGetSystem.CodeDom10.0.3src/eQuantic.Core.Api/eQuantic.Core.Api.csproj
NuGetSwashbuckle.AspNetCore10.2.3src/eQuantic.Core.Api/eQuantic.Core.Api.csproj
NuGetSwashbuckle.AspNetCore.Annotations10.2.3src/eQuantic.Core.Api/eQuantic.Core.Api.csproj
All dependencies 26

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 18 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGeteQuantic.Core.Application4.0.0direct
NuGeteQuantic.Core.Exceptions4.0.0direct
NuGeteQuantic.Linq.Web.Swashbuckle3.7.1direct
NuGetSwashbuckle.AspNetCore10.2.3direct
NuGetSwashbuckle.AspNetCore8.1.4direct
NuGetSwashbuckle.AspNetCore.Annotations10.2.3direct
NuGetSwashbuckle.AspNetCore.Annotations8.1.4direct
NuGetSystem.CodeDom10.0.3direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4indirect
NuGeteQuantic.Core.Data.EntityFramework.SqlServer8.0.8indirect
NuGeteQuantic.Core.Data.EntityFramework.SqlServer8.3.0indirect
NuGeteQuantic.Core.Domain4.0.0indirect
NuGeteQuantic.Mapper2.2.1indirect
NuGetFluentAssertions7.0.0indirect
NuGetFluentValidation11.11.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.OpenApi8.0.15indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.TestHost10.0.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.TestHost8.0.24indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design8.0.15indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.InMemory8.0.15indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.14.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub8.0.0indirect
NuGetMoq4.20.72indirect
NuGetNUnit4.3.2indirect
NuGetNUnit.Analyzers4.9.1indirect
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter5.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 26 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.