Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-02 03:09 UTC

easyops-cn / docusaurus-search-local

Offline/local search for Docusaurus v2/v3

TypeScriptMIT★ 900 stars⑂ 122 forkssince Oct 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryWeb interfacehow this is determined

easyops-cn/docusaurus-search-local holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (80/100) and lowest on Security (53/100). It was last updated 34 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

优维科技Organization
21 followers135 public repossince Apr 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npm@easyops-cn/docusaurus-search-local0.55.31,352,35813634 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

66Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 34 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence8/52 weeks with commits
14.4/18Commit volume39 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year39
human_commit_share0.87
days_since_last_push34
active_weeks_last_year8

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 34 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~41.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.55.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release34
mean_days_between_releases41.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

78Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
47.9/60Stars900 stars
17.4/25Forks122 forks
5/15Watchers9 watchers
Inputs used
forks122
stars900
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescoveralls.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads1,352,358 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@easyops-cn/docusaurus-search-local
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads1,352,358
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 73% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth28 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled28
top_contributor_share0.733
How it's scored
27.3/42Issue resolution65% of issues closed
24.7/30PR acceptance276/335 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 10/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs276
open_issues81
closed_issues151
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.651
closed_unmerged_prs59
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.7/25Owner reach21 followers of easyops-cn
25/25Track record135 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers21
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logineasyops-cn
public_repos135
account_age_days3,435

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 34 days ago
20/20Version history136 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@easyops-cn/docusaurus-search-local
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish34

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.eslintrc
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://easyops-cn.github.io/docusaurus-search-local/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdocusaurus, docusaurus2, search, docusaurus-v3
has_wikino
homepagehttps://easyops-cn.github.io/docusaurus-search-local/
docs_sitehttps://easyops-cn.github.io/docusaurus-search-local/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

53Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 10/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities125 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
6.4/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories3 affected: image-size 2.0.2 (high 7.5), serialize-javascript 6.0.2 (high 8.1), uuid 8.3.2 (high 7.5)
28.8/40No advisories left outstanding2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 186 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories5
affected_packages3
assessed_packages1,113
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 3
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the npm:@easyops-cn/docusaurus-search-local@0.55.3 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 1113 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history84 of 87 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.966
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.eslintrc
11/11Static type checkingdocusaurus-search-local/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesyarn.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsdocusaurus-search-local/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes1/106 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes2,992,863
source_files_sampled106
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

900GitHub stars
28contributors
39commits, last 12 months
34days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
81open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 122 ⇿
0Stars
122Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012512232021-012023-102026-08
Major 0Minor 40Patch 60

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-02 03:09 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 10/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities125 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 39
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@docusaurus/plugin-content-docs^2 || ^3docusaurus-search-local/package.json
npm@docusaurus/theme-translations^2 || ^3docusaurus-search-local/package.json
npm@docusaurus/utils^2 || ^3docusaurus-search-local/package.json
npm@docusaurus/utils-common^2 || ^3docusaurus-search-local/package.json
npm@docusaurus/utils-validation^2 || ^3docusaurus-search-local/package.json
npm@easyops-cn/autocomplete.js^0.38.1docusaurus-search-local/package.json
npm@node-rs/jieba^1.6.0docusaurus-search-local/package.json
npmcheerio^1.0.0docusaurus-search-local/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1docusaurus-search-local/package.json
npmcomlink^4.4.2docusaurus-search-local/package.json
npmdebug^4.2.0docusaurus-search-local/package.json
npmfs-extra^10.0.0docusaurus-search-local/package.json
npmklaw-sync^6.0.0docusaurus-search-local/package.json
npmlunr^2.3.9docusaurus-search-local/package.json
npmlunr-languages^1.4.0docusaurus-search-local/package.json
npmmark.js^8.11.1docusaurus-search-local/package.json
npmtslib^2.4.0docusaurus-search-local/package.json
npm@docusaurus/core^3.7.0website-multi-docs/package.json
npm@docusaurus/plugin-content-docs^3.7.0website-multi-docs/package.json
npm@docusaurus/preset-classic^3.7.0website-multi-docs/package.json
npm@docusaurus/theme-classic^3.7.0website-multi-docs/package.json
npm@docusaurus/theme-common^3.7.0website-multi-docs/package.json
npm@easyops-cn/docusaurus-search-local^workspace:*website-multi-docs/package.json
npm@mdx-js/react^3.1.0website-multi-docs/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1website-multi-docs/package.json
npmprism-react-renderer^2.1.0website-multi-docs/package.json
npmreact^19.0.0website-multi-docs/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.0.0website-multi-docs/package.json
npm@docusaurus/core^3.7.0website/package.json
npm@docusaurus/plugin-content-docs^3.7.0website/package.json
npm@docusaurus/preset-classic^3.7.0website/package.json
npm@docusaurus/theme-classic^3.7.0website/package.json
npm@docusaurus/theme-common^3.7.0website/package.json
npm@easyops-cn/docusaurus-search-localworkspace:*website/package.json
npm@mdx-js/react^3.1.0website/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1website/package.json
npmopen-ask-ai^0.7.3website/package.json
npmreact^19.0.0website/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.0.0website/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 3

Installing npm:@easyops-cn/docusaurus-search-local@0.55.3 pulls in 1,113 packages, direct and transitive: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
image-size2.0.2indirecthigh2
serialize-javascript6.0.2indirecthigh27.0.5
uuid8.3.2indirecthigh113.0.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.