Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 03:10 UTC

ebiquity / crystalia-collector

HTMLCustom license★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Oct 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

ebiquity/crystalia-collector holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (34/100). It was last updated 8 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

UMBC Ebiquity LabOrganization
11 followers30 public repossince Oct 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIcrystalia-collector0.1.1317110 days agodata-engineeringknowledge-graphprovenance

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

62Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

56Moderate
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 8 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits
15.1/18Commit volume — 47 commits in the last year
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
commits_last_year47
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push8
active_weeks_last_year5

Release discipline

72Good
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 1 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 10 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv0.1.1
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release10
mean_days_between_releases—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

34At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

4Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
4.3/15Watchers — 7 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

64Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

42Weak
How it's scored
33.4/80Monthly downloads — 317 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagescrystalia-collector
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads317
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

40Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — 0/1 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

76Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
7.8/25Owner reach — 11 followers of Ebiquity
22.9/25Track record — 30 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers11
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginEbiquity
public_repos30
account_age_days5,012
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

84Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 10 days ago
4/20Version history — 1 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescrystalia-collector
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish10

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — ruff.toml
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

39Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

39Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
6.8/7.5Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 27 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,447
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

73Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, data_model/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — ruff.toml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespoetry.lock, uv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, data_model/Makefile
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — HTML without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/58 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageHTML
largest_source_bytes35,641
source_files_sampled58
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — data_model/project/graphql/crystalia.graphql, data_model/project/protobuf/crystalia.proto
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesdata_model/project/graphql/crystalia.graphql, data_model/project/protobuf/crystalia.proto
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
47commits, last 12 months
8days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch pypi package 'linkml_crystalia' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'crystalia-collector-batch-infra' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10
3.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 03:10 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
9Maintained11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities27 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 18
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIlinkml-runtime^1.1.24data_model/pyproject.toml
PyPIpulumi^3.107.0infrastructure/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic^2.6.3infrastructure/pyproject.toml
PyPIboto3^1.34.61infrastructure/pyproject.toml
PyPIpulumi-aws^6.29.1infrastructure/pyproject.toml
PyPIpulumi-aws-native^0.101.0infrastructure/pyproject.toml
PyPIpulumi-terraform^5.13.4infrastructure/pyproject.toml
PyPItyper>=0.4.0pyproject.toml
PyPItoml>=0.10.2pyproject.toml
PyPIboto3>=1.18.0pyproject.toml
PyPIlinkml-runtime>=1.11pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2pyproject.toml
PyPIrdflib>=6.0pyproject.toml
PyPIhbreader>=0.9pyproject.toml
PyPIsentry-sdk>=2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIstructlog>=24.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settings>=2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIrich>=13.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 200

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 19 direct and 181 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIboto31.35.46direct
PyPIboto31.43.42direct
PyPIhbreader0.9.1direct
PyPIlinkml-runtime1.11.1direct
PyPIlinkml-runtime1.8.3direct
PyPIpulumi3.137.0direct
PyPIpulumi-aws6.56.1direct
PyPIpulumi-aws-native0.101.0direct
PyPIpulumi-terraform5.13.4direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.4direct
PyPIpydantic2.9.2direct
PyPIpydantic-settings2.14.2direct
PyPIrdflib7.1.0direct
PyPIrdflib7.6.0direct
PyPIrich15.0.0direct
PyPIsentry-sdk2.64.0direct
PyPIstructlog26.1.0direct
PyPItoml0.10.2direct
PyPItyper0.26.8direct
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIantlr4-python3-runtime4.9.3indirect
PyPIarpeggio2.0.2indirect
PyPIarrow1.3.0indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.6.0indirect
PyPIattrs24.2.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbackports-zstd1.6.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.12.3indirect
PyPIbioregistry0.11.19indirect
PyPIbotocore1.35.46indirect
PyPIbotocore1.43.42indirect
PyPIcachetools5.5.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2024.8.30indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17indirect
PyPIcfgraph0.2.1indirect
PyPIchardet5.2.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.9indirect
PyPIclick—indirect
PyPIclick8.1.7indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.0indirect
PyPIcrystalia-collector0.1.1indirect
PyPIcuries0.14.1indirect
PyPIcuries0.8.0indirect
PyPIdaff1.3.46indirect
PyPIdebugpy1.8.7indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.2.14indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.3.1indirect
PyPIdill0.3.9indirect
PyPIeditorconfig0.12.4indirect
PyPIet-xmlfile1.1.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.2.2indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIfqdn1.5.1indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgoogle3.0.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-api-core2.21.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-api-python-client2.149.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth2.35.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth-httplib20.2.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth-oauthlib1.2.1indirect
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos1.65.0indirect
PyPIgraphviz0.20.3indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.1.1indirect
PyPIgrpcio1.66.2indirect
PyPIgspread6.1.4indirect
PyPIgspread-formatting1.2.0indirect
PyPIhtml5lib-modern1.2indirect
PyPIhttplib20.22.0indirect
PyPIidna3.10indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.5.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIisodate0.7.2indirect
PyPIisoduration20.11.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.4indirect
PyPIjmespath1.0.1indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjsbeautifier1.15.1indirect
PyPIjson-flattener0.1.9indirect
PyPIjsonasobj1.3.1indirect
PyPIjsonasobj21.0.4indirect
PyPIjsonpatch1.33indirect
PyPIjsonpath-ng1.7.0indirect
PyPIjsonpointer3.0.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.23.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2024.10.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIlibrt0.13.0indirect
PyPIlinkml1.8.4indirect
PyPIlinkml-dataops0.1.0indirect
PyPImarkdown3.7indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.2indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-material8.5.11indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-mermaid2-plugin1.1.1indirect
PyPImore-click0.1.2indirect
PyPImypy2.2.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPIoauthlib3.2.2indirect
PyPIontodev-cogs0.3.3indirect
PyPIopenpyxl3.1.5indirect
PyPIpackaging24.1indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIparse1.20.2indirect
PyPIparver0.5indirect
PyPIpathspec0.12.1indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.3.6indirect
PyPIpluggy1.5.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIply3.11indirect
PyPIprefixcommons0.1.12indirect
PyPIprefixmaps0.2.6indirect
PyPIproto-plus1.25.0indirect
PyPIprotobuf4.25.5indirect
PyPIprotobuf5.28.3indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.1indirect
PyPIpyasn1-modules0.4.1indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.23.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpygments2.18.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyjsg0.11.10indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions10.11.2indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.2.0indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpyshex0.8.1indirect
PyPIpyshexc0.9.1indirect
PyPIpystow0.5.6indirect
PyPIpystow0.8.21indirect
PyPIpytest8.3.3indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-logging2015.11.4indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpytrie0.4.0indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.2indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag0.1indirect
PyPIrdflib-jsonld0.6.1indirect
PyPIrdflib-shim1.0.3indirect
PyPIreferencing0.35.1indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.32.3indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequests-oauthlib2.0.0indirect
PyPIrfc3339-validator0.1.4indirect
PyPIrfc39871.3.8indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.20.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIrsa4.9indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml0.18.6indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml-clib0.2.12indirect
PyPIruff0.15.20indirect
PyPIruff0.2.2indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.10.3indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.19.0indirect
PyPIschemasheets0.1.24indirect
PyPIsemver2.13.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools75.2.0indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIshexjsg0.8.2indirect
PyPIsix1.16.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.6indirect
PyPIsparqlslurper0.5.1indirect
PyPIsparqlwrapper2.0.0indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.36indirect
PyPItabulate0.9.0indirect
PyPItermcolor2.5.0indirect
PyPItomli2.0.2indirect
PyPItqdm4.66.5indirect
PyPItqdm4.68.4indirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutil2.9.0.20241003indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.12.2indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIuri-template1.3.0indirect
PyPIuritemplate4.1.1indirect
PyPIurllib32.2.3indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIwatchdog5.0.3indirect
PyPIwebcolors24.8.0indirect
PyPIwrapt1.16.0indirect
PyPIwrapt2.2.2indirect
PyPIzipp3.20.2indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ebiquity/crystalia-collector. Read them side by side →

88benseverndev-oss/goldenmatchZero-config entity resolution feeding a durable identity layer: messy records from any source become stable golden entities, a Customer 360 with provenance, merge/split and audit. Fellegi-Sunter beats hand-tuned Splink. Arrow-native/Rust, 250M rows in 11.2 min. Python + edge TypeScript (WASM), SQL-native in Postgres & DuckDB, 97 MCP tools + REST.Excellent71russalo/file-observerDeterministic file observation for pipelines — one read-only pass over a directory emits a reproducible JSON manifest of every file's type, metadata, structure, and provenance.Good84Blackcat-Informatics/purrdfPurRDF — one RDF 1.2 engine, one behavior, every language: interned primitives, Turtle/TriG/N-Quads/RDF-XML/JSON-LD codecs, RDFC-1.0, SPARQL 1.1/1.2, SHACL Core, GTS graph transport, and Python/WebAssembly/C bindings.Excellent71yazanabuashour/openclerkThe governance layer for LLM-maintained Markdown wikis.Good59ai-university-aiu/causalontologyCausalontology - the world's first programming-language-neutral standard and shared commons for reified causation. AGI's Missing Link.Moderate100PrefectHQ/prefectPrefect is a workflow orchestration framework for building resilient data pipelines in Python.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.