Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-21 12:09 UTC

eclipse-platform / eclipse.platform

Eclipse Platform - a comprehensive set of frameworks and common services that collectively provide a powerful software development infrastructure.

JavaEPL-2.0★ 165 stars⑂ 171 forkssince Mar 2022View on GitHub ↗

eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (86/100) and lowest on Vitality (60/100). It was last updated today. 6 contributors account for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Eclipse PlatformOrganization
322 followers22 public repossince Nov 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Mavenorg.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.help3.11.100-2274 days ago
Mavenorg.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.ui.intro3.8.100-2974 days ago
Mavenorg.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.help.base4.6.100-4074 days ago
Mavenorg.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.help.webapp3.12.500-3674 days ago
Mavenorg.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.ui.cheatsheets3.9.100-2674 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

60Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
35.3/36Commit cadence51/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume593 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year593
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year51
How it's scored
0/27Ships releasesno releases published
0/36Release recencyno releases
0/27Release cadenceno releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

73Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
35.9/60Stars165 stars
18.6/25Forks171 forks
7/15Watchers19 watchers
Inputs used
forks171
stars165
watchers19
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (EPL-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

86Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
48.6/54Bus factor6 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 16% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth97 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 38 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor6
contributors_sampled97
top_contributor_share0.16
How it's scored
30.9/42Issue resolution74% of issues closed
26.8/30PR acceptance1,757/1,969 decided PRs merged
9.8/13Newcomer PR acceptance3/4 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 11/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs1,757
open_issues205
closed_issues571
prs_merged_7d3
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d39
prs_decided_30d43
issue_closed_ratio0.736
closed_unmerged_prs212
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d3
first_time_prs_decided_30d4
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
18/25Owner reach322 followers of eclipse-platform
19.4/25Track record22 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers322
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logineclipse-platform
public_repos22
account_age_days1,725
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable5 package(s) on maven
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 74 days ago
20/20Version history40 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesorg.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.help, org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.ui.intro, org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.help.base, org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.help.webapp, org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.ui.cheatsheets
ecosystemsmaven
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish74

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows9 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://eclipse.dev/eclipse/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicseclipse, java
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://eclipse.dev/eclipse/
docs_sitehttps://eclipse.dev/eclipse/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

69Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 11/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 38 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
4.5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages11
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the maven:org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.help@3.11.100 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 11 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

79Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
39.9/40Legible commit history74 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.747
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes10,719
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapresources/bundles/org.eclipse.core.filesystem/natives/unix/fastlinux/Makefile, resources/bundles/org.eclipse.core.filesystem/natives/unix/linux/Makefile, resources/bundles/org.eclipse.core.filesystem/natives/unix/macosx/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingJava (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesresources/bundles/org.eclipse.core.filesystem/natives/unix/fastlinux/Makefile, resources/bundles/org.eclipse.core.filesystem/natives/unix/linux/Makefile, resources/bundles/org.eclipse.core.filesystem/natives/unix/macosx/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsdebug/pom.xml, pom.xml, resources/bundles/org.eclipse.core.filesystem.linux.aarch64/pom.xml, resources/bundles/org.eclipse.core.filesystem.linux.loongarch64/pom.xml, resources/bundles/org.eclipse.core.filesystem.linux.ppc64le/pom.xml, resources/bundles/org.eclipse.core.filesystem.linux.x86_64/pom.xml, resources/bundles/org.eclipse.core.filesystem.macosx/pom.xml, resources/bundles/org.eclipse.core.tools.resources/pom.xml, resources/examples/pom.xml, resources/pom.xml, resources/tests/org.eclipse.core.tests.resources/pom.xml, resources/tests/pom.xml, runtime/pom.xml, runtime/tests/org.eclipse.e4.core.tests/pom.xml, team/bundles/org.eclipse.compare.win32/pom.xml, team/examples/org.eclipse.compare.examples.xml/pom.xml, team/examples/org.eclipse.compare.examples/pom.xml, team/examples/org.eclipse.team.examples.filesystem/pom.xml, team/pom.xml, team/tests/org.eclipse.core.tests.net/pom.xml, team/tests/pom.xml, terminal/pom.xml, ua/infocenter-web/infocenter-app/pom.xml, ua/infocenter-web/infocenter-product/pom.xml, ua/infocenter-web/pom.xml, ua/org.eclipse.help.base/pom.xml, ua/org.eclipse.help.webapp/pom.xml, ua/org.eclipse.help/pom.xml, ua/org.eclipse.ua.tests.doc/pom.xml, ua/org.eclipse.ua.tests/pom.xml, ua/org.eclipse.ui.cheatsheets/pom.xml, ua/org.eclipse.ui.intro.quicklinks.examples/pom.xml, ua/org.eclipse.ui.intro.solstice.examples/pom.xml, ua/org.eclipse.ui.intro/pom.xml, ua/pom.xml, ua/tests-pom/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeJava (statically typed)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes32/5,613 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes196,325
source_files_sampled5,613
oversized_source_files32
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples, samples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, samples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

165GitHub stars
97contributors
593commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
6bus factor
205open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch maven package 'org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.ua.tests' from its registry
  • Could not fetch maven package 'org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.ua.tests.doc' from its registry
  • Could not fetch maven package 'org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.ui.intro.solstice.examples' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 171 ⇿
0Stars
171Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020016432022-032024-062026-08

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10
6.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-21 12:08 UTC

0Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 11/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 38 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 10

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 10 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-war-plugin3.4.0indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.help:infocenter-product1.0.0-SNAPSHOTindirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jetty.ee8:jetty-ee8-jspc-maven-plugin12.0.23indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.tycho:target-platform-configurationindirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.tycho:tycho-compiler-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.tycho:tycho-p2-director-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.tycho:tycho-p2-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.tycho:tycho-packaging-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.tycho:tycho-surefire-pluginindirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing maven:org.eclipse.platform:org.eclipse.help@3.11.100 pulls in 11 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsMaven.