Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 16:46 UTC

edge-base / edgebase

TypeScriptMIT★ 8 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Mar 2026archivedView on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

edge-base/edgebase holds a health index of 19 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (93/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (50/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.

19
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

19
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

edge-baseOrganization
2 followers8 public repossince Mar 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@edge-base/cli0.5.02333249 days agoedgebaseclibaasbackendcloudflare-workers
npm@edge-base/server0.5.01823249 days agoedgebaseruntimeservercloudflare-workers
npm@edge-base/shared0.5.02343249 days agoedgebasesharedconfigfunctions
npmcreate-edgebase0.5.01353349 days agoedgebasecreate-edgebasescaffoldcli

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

52Moderate
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 20 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 398 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project is archived
Inputs used
commits_last_year398
human_commit_share0.94
days_since_last_push20
active_weeks_last_year8

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 17 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 49 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count17
latest_release_tagv0.5.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release49
mean_days_between_releases2.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

14Critical
How it's scored
13.7/60Stars — 8 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars8
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonbelow_threshold

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

48Weak
How it's scored
38.6/80Monthly downloads — 784 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@edge-base/cli, @edge-base/server, @edge-base/shared, create-edgebase
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads784
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

14Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 92% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.921

Issue & PR responsiveness

69Good
How it's scored
38.2/42Issue resolution — 91% of issues closed
21.5/30PR acceptance — 53/74 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs53
open_issues1
closed_issues10
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.909
closed_unmerged_prs21
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

41Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
3.4/25Owner reach — 2 followers of edge-base
7.9/25Track record — 8 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginedge-base
public_repos8
account_age_days181

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 4 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 49 days ago
20/20Version history — 33 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@edge-base/cli, @edge-base/server, @edge-base/shared, create-edgebase
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish49

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 11 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

67Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

64Moderate
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project is archived
0/5Packaging — no data
4/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 77 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

81Excellent
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
6/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 4 affected: sharp 0.35.2 (high 8.4), undici 7.28.0 (high 7.4), hono 4.12.25 (moderate 6.5), +1 more
40/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories17
affected_packages4
assessed_packages191
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 1, low 1
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the npm:@edge-base/cli@0.5.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 191 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

93Exceptional · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENT.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
40/40Legible commit history — 79 of 94 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.84
agent_instruction_filesAGENT.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes5,111

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

90Excellent
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — packages/sdk/csharp/packages/admin/EdgeBase.Admin.csproj, packages/sdk/csharp/packages/admin/tests/EdgeBase.Admin.Tests.csproj, packages/sdk/csharp/packages/core/EdgeBase.Core.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
11/11Static type checking — docs/tsconfig.json, packages/admin/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/core/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/js/packages/admin/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/js/packages/auth-ui-react/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/js/packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/js/packages/ssr/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/js/packages/web/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/js/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/react-native/tsconfig.json, packages/server/tsconfig.json, packages/shared/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 37 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesmix.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml, yarn.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsdocs/tsconfig.json, packages/admin/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/plugins/core/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/js/packages/admin/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/js/packages/auth-ui-react/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/js/packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/js/packages/ssr/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/js/packages/web/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/js/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk/react-native/tsconfig.json, packages/server/tsconfig.json, packages/shared/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.37
toolchain_manifestspackages/sdk/csharp/packages/admin/EdgeBase.Admin.csproj, packages/sdk/csharp/packages/admin/tests/EdgeBase.Admin.Tests.csproj, packages/sdk/csharp/packages/core/EdgeBase.Core.csproj, packages/sdk/csharp/packages/unity/EdgeBase.Unity.csproj, packages/sdk/csharp/packages/unity/tests/EdgeBase.Unity.Tests.csproj, packages/sdk/csharp/src/EdgeBase.csproj, packages/sdk/csharp/tests/EdgeBase.Tests.csproj, packages/sdk/elixir/packages/admin/mix.exs, packages/sdk/elixir/packages/core/mix.exs, packages/sdk/go/go.mod, packages/sdk/java/build.gradle, packages/sdk/java/packages/admin/build.gradle, packages/sdk/java/packages/android/build.gradle, packages/sdk/java/packages/core/build.gradle, packages/sdk/kotlin/admin/build.gradle.kts, packages/sdk/kotlin/build.gradle.kts, packages/sdk/kotlin/client/build.gradle.kts, packages/sdk/kotlin/core/build.gradle.kts, packages/sdk/rust/Cargo.toml, packages/sdk/rust/packages/admin/Cargo.toml, packages/sdk/rust/packages/core/Cargo.toml, packages/sdk/scala/build.gradle.kts, packages/sdk/scala/packages/admin/build.gradle.kts, packages/sdk/scala/packages/core/build.gradle.kts
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

98Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
53.4/55Manageable file sizes — 36/1,207 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes205,754
source_files_sampled1,207
oversized_source_files36

Machine-readable interfaces

80Excellent
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — packages/server/openapi.json
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filespackages/server/openapi.json
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

8GitHub stars
2contributors
398commits, last 12 months
20days since last push
17releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-05-19: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 8 stars today.
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 7 ★ / 2 ⇿
7Stars
2Forks
7Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-05-19. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

12345677242026-032026-042026-05
Major 0Minor 0Patch 7
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 16:46 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject is archived
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
8Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
8Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities77 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 23
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@edge-base/serverworkspace:*packages/cli/package.json
npm@edge-base/sharedworkspace:*packages/cli/package.json
npmchalk^5.4.0packages/cli/package.json
npmcommander^13.1.0packages/cli/package.json
npmesbuild^0.28.1packages/cli/package.json
npmjose^6.0.0packages/cli/package.json
npmora^9.3.0packages/cli/package.json
npmpg^8.16.3packages/cli/package.json
npmtsx^4.20.6packages/cli/package.json
npmts-morph^27.0.2packages/cli/package.json
npmwrangler4.114.0packages/cli/package.json
npm@edge-base/cliworkspace:*packages/create-edgebase/package.json
npm@edge-base/coreworkspace:*packages/server/package.json
npm@edge-base/sharedworkspace:*packages/server/package.json
npm@hono/zod-openapi^1.2.2packages/server/package.json
npm@simplewebauthn/server^10packages/server/package.json
npmbcryptjs^3.0.3packages/server/package.json
npmhono4.12.25packages/server/package.json
npmjose^6.0.0packages/server/package.json
npmpg^8.16.3packages/server/package.json
npmzod^4.3.6packages/server/package.json
npmtsx^4.0.0tools/sdk-codegen/package.json
npmtsx^4.0.0tools/smoke-gen/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 4

Installing npm:@edge-base/cli@0.5.0 pulls in 191 packages, direct and transitive: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
sharp0.35.2indirecthigh10.35.4
undici7.28.0indirecthigh58.9.0
hono4.12.25indirectmoderate104.13.5
@simplewebauthn/server10.0.1indirectlow113.3.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with edge-base/edgebase. Read them side by side →

96remix-run/remixThe fully-stacked web frameworkExceptional96modernweb-dev/webGuides, tools and libraries for modern web development.Exceptional98webpack/webpack-cliWebpack's Command Line InterfaceExceptional98invertase/react-native-firebase🔥 A well-tested feature-rich modular Firebase implementation for React Native. Supports both iOS & Android platforms for all Firebase services.Exceptional98deepnote/deepnoteDeepnote is a drop-in replacement for Jupyter with an AI-first design, sleek UI, new blocks, and native data integrations. Use Python, R, and SQL locally in your favorite IDE, then scale to Deepnote cloud for real-time collaboration, Deepnote agent, and deployable data apps. https://deepnote.com/Exceptional97parse-community/parse-serverParse Server for Node.js / ExpressExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.