Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 05:31 UTC

einfachnuralex / gardener

Kubernetes-native system managing the full lifecycle of conformant Kubernetes clusters as a service on Alicloud, AWS, Azure, GCP, OpenStack, Packet, MetalStack, and vSphere with minimal TCO.

GoApache-2.0★ 0 stars⑂ 1 forksince Aug 2020forkView on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

einfachnuralex/gardener holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (95/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated today. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

STACKITOrganization
434 followers97 public repossince Sep 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/gardener/gardenerpoints to another repo — not scoredv1.147.0-7320 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
28.4/36Commit cadence41/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume1,454 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,454
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year41

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases91 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 9 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~27.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count91
latest_release_tagv1.146.1-ske-1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release9
mean_days_between_releases27.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars0
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 32% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 17 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.316
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
25.2/30PR acceptance146/174 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs146
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs28
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
19/25Owner reach434 followers of stackitcloud
25/25Track record97 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers434
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginstackitcloud
public_repos97
account_age_days2,492
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://gardener.cloud
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics1 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsske
has_wikino
homepagehttps://gardener.cloud
docs_sitehttps://gardener.cloud
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 17 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities45 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes45/3,858 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes1,591,219
source_files_sampled3,858
oversized_source_files45
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)pkg/apis/authentication/v1alpha1/generated.proto, pkg/apis/core/v1/generated.proto, pkg/apis/core/v1beta1/generated.proto, pkg/apis/operations/v1alpha1/generated.proto, pkg/apis/security/v1alpha1/generated.proto, pkg/apis/seedmanagement/v1alpha1/generated.proto
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexample
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filespkg/apis/authentication/v1alpha1/generated.proto, pkg/apis/core/v1/generated.proto, pkg/apis/core/v1beta1/generated.proto, pkg/apis/operations/v1alpha1/generated.proto, pkg/apis/security/v1alpha1/generated.proto, pkg/apis/seedmanagement/v1alpha1/generated.proto
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
100contributors
1,454commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
91releases
3bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • go package 'github.com/gardener/gardener' points at a different repository (https://github.com/gardener/gardener); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-18 05:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 17 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities45 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 88
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/Masterminds/semver/v3v3.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/Masterminds/sprig/v3v3.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/VictoriaMetrics/operator/apiv0.66.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/brotliv1.2.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/bramvdbogaerde/go-scpv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/containerd/containerd/v2v2.2.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/containerd/errdefsv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-systemd/v22v22.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/distribution/distribution/v3v3.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/docker/cliv29.4.1+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/docker/dockerv28.5.2+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/docker/go-connectionsv0.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/elastic/crd-ref-docsv0.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/elliotchance/orderedmap/v3v3.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/fluent/fluent-operator/v3v3.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gardener/cert-managementv0.22.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gardener/dependency-watchdogv1.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gardener/etcd-druid/apiv0.36.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/gardener/machine-controller-managerv0.61.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/gardener/terminal-controller-managerv0.35.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4v4.1.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-test/deepv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-yamlv1.19.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/gnostic-modelsv0.7.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/go-containerregistryv0.21.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierrorv1.1.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/kubernetes-csi/external-snapshotter/client/v4v4.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/miekg/dnsv1.1.72go.mod
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/hashstructure/v2v2.0.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2v2.28.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/onsi/gomegav1.40.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/image-specv1.1.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-tomlv1.9.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/perses/perses-operatorv0.3.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus-operator/prometheus-operator/pkg/apis/monitoringv0.90.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/blackbox_exporterv0.28.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golangv1.23.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/prometheus/commonv0.67.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/robfig/cronv1.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/aferov1.15.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.21.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/texttheater/golang-levenshteinv1.0.1go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/otelconfv0.23.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/goleakv1.3.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/mockv0.6.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.28.0go.mod
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v2v2.4.4go.mod
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v4v4.0.0-rc.2go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.50.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.36.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.15.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.44.0go.mod
Gogomodules.xyz/jsonpatch/v2v2.5.0go.mod
Gogonum.org/v1/gonumv0.17.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11go.mod
Gohelm.sh/helm/v3v3.20.2go.mod
Goistio.io/apiv1.29.2go.mod
Goistio.io/client-gov1.29.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/apiv0.35.4go.mod
Gok8s.io/apiextensions-apiserverv0.35.4go.mod
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.35.4go.mod
Gok8s.io/apiserverv0.35.4go.mod
Gok8s.io/autoscaler/vertical-pod-autoscalerv1.6.0go.mod
Gok8s.io/cli-runtimev0.35.4go.mod
Gok8s.io/client-gov0.35.4go.mod
Gok8s.io/cloud-providerv0.35.4go.mod
Gok8s.io/cluster-bootstrapv0.35.4go.mod
Gok8s.io/code-generatorv0.35.4go.mod
Gok8s.io/component-basev0.35.4go.mod
Gok8s.io/component-helpersv0.35.4go.mod
Gok8s.io/klog/v2v2.140.0go.mod
Gok8s.io/kube-aggregatorv0.35.4go.mod
Gok8s.io/kube-openapiv0.0.0-20260317180543-43fb72c5454ago.mod
Gok8s.io/kube-proxyv0.35.4go.mod
Gok8s.io/kube-state-metrics/v2v2.13.0go.mod
Gok8s.io/kubeletv0.35.4go.mod
Gok8s.io/metricsv0.35.4go.mod
Gok8s.io/pod-security-admissionv0.35.4go.mod
Gok8s.io/utilsv0.0.0-20260319190234-28399d86e0b5go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-runtimev0.23.3go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-toolsv0.20.1go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/yamlv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gardener/gardener/pkg/apisv1.140.0go.mod
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.