Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 02:54 UTC

ekkx / yaylib

nanameue, Inc. Yay! (イェイ) - API ライブラリ 🛠️

Rust · Go · TypeScriptMIT★ 155 stars⑂ 16 forkssince Apr 2023View on GitHub ↗

ekkx/yaylib holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (72/100) and lowest on Security (13/100). It was last updated 56 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

62
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

62
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ekkxPersonal account
26 followers23 public repossince Jan 2021

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/ekkx/yaylib/v2v2.3.0-856 days ago
Gogithub.com/ekkx/yaylibv1.5.4-7482 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

68Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 56 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 135 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year135
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push56
active_weeks_last_year8

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 23 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 56 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count23
latest_release_tagrs-v2.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release56
mean_days_between_releases2.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

61Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
35.5/60Stars — 155 stars
9.8/25Forks — 16 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks16
stars155
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.997
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
28/30PR acceptance — 43/46 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs43
open_issues0
closed_issues50
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
10.3/25Owner reach — 26 followers of ekkx
21.4/25Track record — 23 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers26
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginekkx
public_repos23
account_age_days2,073
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 56 days ago
20/20Version history — 8 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/ekkx/yaylib/v2, github.com/ekkx/yaylib
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish56

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — tox.ini
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 11 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsapi, yay, nanameue, python, client, sdk, bot, library, wrapper, framework, automation
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

13Critical · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles — published library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
manifestsgo.mod, mockd/go.mod
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
13/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: golang.org/x/image v0.18.0 (high 7.5), go.opentelemetry.io/otel v1.43.0 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33.7/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 176 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories26
affected_packages7
assessed_packages122
unassessed_packages41
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 1, low 1, unknown 3
direct_affected_packages2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 122 resolved dependencies against OSV. 41 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

71Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — examples/rust/event_stream/Cargo.toml, examples/rust/post/Cargo.toml, examples/rust/session_and_errors/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — tox.ini
11/11Static type checking — packages/python/yaylib/py.typed, packages/typescript/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspackages/python/yaylib/py.typed, packages/typescript/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsexamples/rust/event_stream/Cargo.toml, examples/rust/post/Cargo.toml, examples/rust/session_and_errors/Cargo.toml, examples/rust/timeline/Cargo.toml, go.mod, mockd/go.mod, packages/rust/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
54/55Manageable file sizes — 39/2,227 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes959,540
source_files_sampled2,227
oversized_source_files39
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

155GitHub stars
3contributors
135commits, last 12 months
56days since last push
23releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 16 ⇿
0Stars
16Forks
23Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

04812161612023-042024-122026-09
Major 1Minor 6Patch 3

Each point covers 4 days.

Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/coder/websocketv1.8.13go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/imagev0.18.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/coder/websocketv1.8.14mockd/go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-faster/errorsv0.7.1mockd/go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-faster/jxv1.2.0mockd/go.mod
Gogithub.com/ogen-go/ogenv1.20.3mockd/go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.43.0mockd/go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.43.0mockd/go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.43.0mockd/go.mod
All dependencies 163

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 154 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/coder/websocketv1.8.13direct
Gogithub.com/coder/websocketv1.8.14direct
Gogithub.com/go-faster/errorsv0.7.1direct
Gogithub.com/go-faster/jxv1.2.0direct
Gogithub.com/ogen-go/ogenv1.20.3direct
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.43.0direct
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.43.0direct
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.43.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/imagev0.18.0direct
crates.ioasync-trait—indirect
crates.iobase64—indirect
crates.iobytes—indirect
crates.iochrono—indirect
crates.iofutures-util—indirect
crates.iohmac—indirect
crates.ioimage—indirect
crates.iojsonwebtoken—indirect
crates.iomd-5—indirect
crates.iomime_guess—indirect
crates.iorand—indirect
crates.ioreqwest—indirect
crates.ioserde—indirect
crates.ioserde_json—indirect
crates.ioserde_repr—indirect
crates.ioserde_with—indirect
crates.ioserde_yaml—indirect
crates.iosha2—indirect
crates.iotempfile—indirect
crates.iothiserror—indirect
crates.iotokio—indirect
crates.iotokio-tungstenite—indirect
crates.iotracing—indirect
crates.iotracing-subscriber—indirect
crates.iourl—indirect
crates.iouuid—indirect
crates.iowiremock—indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/dlclark/regexp2v1.11.5indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.19.0indirect
Gogithub.com/ghodss/yamlv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-faster/yamlv0.4.6indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.14indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/segmentio/asmv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/shopspring/decimalv1.4.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.2.1indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.11.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.27.1indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20230725093048-515e97ebf090indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.52.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.42.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.35.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.27.7indirect
npm@types/node20.19.41indirect
npm@types/pngjs6.0.5indirect
npmesbuild0.27.7indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmget-tsconfig4.14.0indirect
npmimage-size1.2.1indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmjpeg-js0.4.4indirect
npmomggif1.0.10indirect
npmpngjs7.0.0indirect
npmqueue6.0.2indirect
npmresolve-pkg-maps1.0.0indirect
npmtsx4.21.0indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmundici-types6.21.0indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.7.1indirect
PyPIaiohttp—indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3indirect
PyPIaiohttp-retry—indirect
PyPIaiohttp-retry2.9.1indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.6.0indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbackports-asyncio-runner1.2.0indirect
PyPIcachetools7.1.5indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.2indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.0indirect
PyPIflake8—indirect
PyPIflake87.3.0indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.13.0indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPImypy—indirect
PyPImypy2.3.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpillow—indirect
PyPIpillow12.3.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIpycodestyle2.14.0indirect
PyPIpydantic—indirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpyflakes3.4.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyproject-api1.11.0indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio—indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov—indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil—indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.5.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomli-w1.2.0indirect
PyPItox—indirect
PyPItox4.58.0indirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutil—indirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutil2.9.0.20260716indirect
PyPItyping-extensions—indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIurllib3—indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.7.0indirect
PyPIyarl1.24.5indirect
Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 122 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct. 41 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/imagev0.18.0directhigh110.45.0
image-size1.2.1indirecthigh2—
golang.org/x/netv0.52.0indirectmoderate91.27.0-rc.3
esbuild0.27.7indirectlow10.28.1
go.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.43.0directunknown11.44.0
golang.org/x/sysv0.42.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/textv0.35.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.