Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-07-28 09:34 UTC

elgatito / elementum

Elementum daemon, for the add-on see

GoMIT★ 67 stars⑂ 50 forkssince Feb 2017forkView on GitHub ↗

KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

elgatito/elementum holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (67/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (37/100). It was last updated 8 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DenisPersonal account

166 followers17 public repossince Dec 2011

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/elgatito/elementum	v0.1.114	-	181	10 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

67Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

58Moderate

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 8 days ago
3.5/36	Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits
15.5/18	Commit volume — 52 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	52
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	8
active_weeks_last_year	5

Release discipline

80Excellent

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 10 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~72 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v0.1.114
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	10
mean_days_between_releases	72

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

37Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

48Weak

How it's scored

29.5/60	Stars — 67 stars
14.1/25	Forks — 50 forks
4.7/15	Watchers — 8 watchers

Inputs used

forks	50
stars	67
watchers	8
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

25At Risk

How it's scored

0/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	no
has_license	no
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

34At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.8/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 61% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 13 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	13
top_contributor_share	0.61

Issue & PR responsiveness

58Moderate

How it's scored

0/42	Issue resolution — no issues or no data
26/30	PR acceptance — 131/151 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	131
open_issues	0
closed_issues	0
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	—
closed_unmerged_prs	20
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

59Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
16/25	Owner reach — 166 followers of elgatito
21.1/25	Track record — 17 public repos, account ~14 yr old

Inputs used

followers	166
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	elgatito
public_repos	17
account_age_days	5,346

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 10 days ago
20/20	Version history — 181 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/elgatito/elementum
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	10

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

25At Risk

How it's scored

0/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/elgatito/plugin.video.elementum
0/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://github.com/elgatito/plugin.video.elementum
has_readme	no
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	no

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

33At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 34 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	3.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): packaging, signed_releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

89Excellent

How it's scored

26.6/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: github.com/klauspost/compress v1.17.4 (unknown)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	54
affected_packages	6
assessed_packages	81
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 1, moderate 1, unknown 3
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 81 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

19Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
18.7/40	Legible commit history — 35 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
legible_history_share	0.35
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

72Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.2/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/139 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	70,081
source_files_sampled	139
oversized_source_files	2

Key facts

67GitHub stars

13contributors

52commits, last 12 months

8days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

0open issues

Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Community profile unavailable

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 50 ⇿

0Stars

50Forks

99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 0Patch 99

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10

3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-28 09:34 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	34 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 34

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/ElementumOrg/go-nat-pmp	`v0.0.0-20250224152958-33a79384df6a`	go.mod
Go	github.com/ElementumOrg/libtorrent-go	`v0.0.0-20230915150218-d8763f5e1783`	go.mod
Go	github.com/RoaringBitmap/roaring	`v1.9.4`	go.mod
Go	github.com/anacrolix/missinggo	`v1.3.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/anacrolix/missinggo/perf	`v1.0.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/anacrolix/sync	`v0.5.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/anacrolix/tagflag	`v1.4.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/asdine/storm	`v2.1.2+incompatible`	go.mod
Go	github.com/c-robinson/iplib/v2	`v2.0.5`	go.mod
Go	github.com/cespare/xxhash	`v1.1.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/dustin/go-humanize	`v1.0.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/elazarl/goproxy	`v0.0.0-20231117061959-7cc037d33fb5`	go.mod
Go	github.com/fatih/color	`v1.16.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gin-gonic/gin	`v1.9.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/goccy/go-json	`v0.10.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hectane/go-acl	`v0.0.0-20230122075934-ca0b05cb1adb`	go.mod
Go	github.com/jackpal/gateway	`v1.0.16`	go.mod
Go	github.com/jmcvetta/napping	`v3.2.0+incompatible`	go.mod
Go	github.com/karrick/godirwalk	`v1.17.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/klauspost/compress	`v1.17.4`	go.mod
Go	github.com/ncruces/go-dns	`v1.2.6`	go.mod
Go	github.com/op/go-logging	`v0.0.0-20160315200505-970db520ece7`	go.mod
Go	github.com/pbnjay/memory	`v0.0.0-20210728143218-7b4eea64cf58`	go.mod
Go	github.com/radovskyb/watcher	`v1.0.7`	go.mod
Go	github.com/sanity-io/litter	`v1.5.5`	go.mod
Go	github.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4	`v4.25.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/spf13/cast	`v1.6.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/valyala/bytebufferpool	`v1.0.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v4	`v4.3.13`	go.mod
Go	github.com/wader/filtertransport	`v0.0.0-20200316221534-bdd9e61eee78`	go.mod
Go	github.com/zeebo/bencode	`v1.0.0`	go.mod
Go	go.etcd.io/bbolt	`v1.3.10`	go.mod
Go	gopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2	`v2.2.1`	go.mod
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	go.mod

All dependencies 81

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 33 direct and 48 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/anacrolix/missinggo	`v1.3.0`	direct
Go	github.com/anacrolix/missinggo/perf	`v1.0.0`	direct
Go	github.com/anacrolix/sync	`v0.5.1`	direct
Go	github.com/anacrolix/tagflag	`v1.4.0`	direct
Go	github.com/asdine/storm	`v2.1.2+incompatible`	direct
Go	github.com/c-robinson/iplib/v2	`v2.0.5`	direct
Go	github.com/cespare/xxhash	`v1.1.0`	direct
Go	github.com/dustin/go-humanize	`v1.0.1`	direct
Go	github.com/elazarl/goproxy	`v0.0.0-20231117061959-7cc037d33fb5`	direct
Go	github.com/elementumorg/go-nat-pmp	`v0.0.0-20250224152958-33a79384df6a`	direct
Go	github.com/elementumorg/libtorrent-go	`v0.0.0-20230915150218-d8763f5e1783`	direct
Go	github.com/fatih/color	`v1.16.0`	direct
Go	github.com/gin-gonic/gin	`v1.9.1`	direct
Go	github.com/goccy/go-json	`v0.10.2`	direct
Go	github.com/hectane/go-acl	`v0.0.0-20230122075934-ca0b05cb1adb`	direct
Go	github.com/jackpal/gateway	`v1.0.16`	direct
Go	github.com/jmcvetta/napping	`v3.2.0+incompatible`	direct
Go	github.com/karrick/godirwalk	`v1.17.0`	direct
Go	github.com/klauspost/compress	`v1.17.4`	direct
Go	github.com/ncruces/go-dns	`v1.2.6`	direct
Go	github.com/op/go-logging	`v0.0.0-20160315200505-970db520ece7`	direct
Go	github.com/pbnjay/memory	`v0.0.0-20210728143218-7b4eea64cf58`	direct
Go	github.com/radovskyb/watcher	`v1.0.7`	direct
Go	github.com/roaringbitmap/roaring	`v1.9.4`	direct
Go	github.com/sanity-io/litter	`v1.5.5`	direct
Go	github.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4	`v4.25.2`	direct
Go	github.com/spf13/cast	`v1.6.0`	direct
Go	github.com/valyala/bytebufferpool	`v1.0.0`	direct
Go	github.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v4	`v4.3.13`	direct
Go	github.com/wader/filtertransport	`v0.0.0-20200316221534-bdd9e61eee78`	direct
Go	github.com/zeebo/bencode	`v1.0.0`	direct
Go	gopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2	`v2.2.1`	direct
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	direct
Go	github.com/anacrolix/missinggo/v2	`v2.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/bits-and-blooms/bitset	`v1.12.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/bradfitz/iter	`v0.0.0-20191230175014-e8f45d346db8`	indirect
Go	github.com/bytedance/sonic	`v1.9.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/chenzhuoyu/base64x	`v0.0.0-20221115062448-fe3a3abad311`	indirect
Go	github.com/davecgh/go-spew	`v1.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/ebitengine/purego	`v0.8.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetype	`v1.4.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/gin-contrib/sse	`v0.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-ole/go-ole	`v1.2.6`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-playground/locales	`v0.14.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-playground/universal-translator	`v0.18.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-playground/validator/v10	`v10.14.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/golang/protobuf	`v1.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/huandu/xstrings	`v1.3.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/jmcvetta/randutil	`v0.0.0-20150817122601-2bb1b664bcff`	indirect
Go	github.com/json-iterator/go	`v1.1.12`	indirect
Go	github.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2	`v2.2.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/leodido/go-urn	`v1.2.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/lufia/plan9stats	`v0.0.0-20211012122336-39d0f177ccd0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-colorable	`v0.1.13`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.20`	indirect
Go	github.com/modern-go/concurrent	`v0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1dd`	indirect
Go	github.com/modern-go/reflect2	`v1.0.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/mschoch/smat	`v0.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2	`v2.0.8`	indirect
Go	github.com/pkg/errors	`v0.9.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/pmezard/go-difflib	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/power-devops/perfstat	`v0.0.0-20210106213030-5aafc221ea8c`	indirect
Go	github.com/sereal/sereal/go/sereal	`v0.0.0-20250307140414-035be09f1bc8`	indirect
Go	github.com/stretchr/objx	`v0.5.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.10.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/tklauser/go-sysconf	`v0.3.12`	indirect
Go	github.com/tklauser/numcpus	`v0.6.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/twitchyliquid64/golang-asm	`v0.15.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/ugorji/go/codec	`v1.2.11`	indirect
Go	github.com/vmihailenco/msgpack	`v4.0.4+incompatible`	indirect
Go	github.com/vmihailenco/tagparser	`v0.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/yusufpapurcu/wmi	`v1.2.4`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/arch	`v0.3.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.31.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.33.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.28.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.21.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/xerrors	`v0.0.0-20200804184101-5ec99f83aff1`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/appengine	`v1.6.5`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.30.0`	indirect
Go	lukechampine.com/uint128	`v1.3.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 81 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.31.0`	indirect	critical	34	`0.52.0`
google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.30.0`	indirect	high	2	`1.33.0`
golang.org/x/net	`v0.33.0`	indirect	moderate	15	`1.26.3`
github.com/klauspost/compress	`v1.17.4`	direct	unknown	1	`1.18.7`
golang.org/x/sys	`v0.28.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.44.0`
golang.org/x/text	`v0.21.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.39.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Related records