Software health reportschema 0.18.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 10:58 UTC

emilioastarita / facturajs

Facturas digitales con AFIP Web Services y nodej

TypeScriptMIT★ 116 stars⑂ 25 forkssince Apr 2018View on GitHub ↗

#cuit #afip #nodejs #node-js #facturacion-electronica #facturacion #factura-electronica #cuil #argentina #monotributo #iva

emilioastarita/facturajs holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (51/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (25/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 39 is calibrated to 34 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Emilio AstaritaPersonal account

80 followers26 public repossince May 2010Cloudymedia

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	facturajs	0.4.2	2,784	16	4 days ago	afip factura wsfe wsfev1 web-service soap nodejs

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

32At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

52Moderate

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 4 days ago
1.4/36	Commit cadence — 2/52 weeks with commits
10/18	Commit volume — 12 commits in the last year
5/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

commits_last_year	12
human_commit_share	—
days_since_last_push	4
active_weeks_last_year	2

Release discipline

1Critical

How it's scored

0/27	Ships releases — no releases published
0/36	Release recency — no releases
0/27	Release cadence — no releases
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

51Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

49Weak

How it's scored

33.4/60	Stars — 116 stars
11.5/25	Forks — 25 forks
4.3/15	Watchers — 7 watchers

Inputs used

forks	25
stars	116
watchers	7
growth_state	organic
growth_factor_pct	100

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

57Moderate

How it's scored

45.9/80	Monthly downloads — 2,784 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	facturajs
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	2,784
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

51Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

16Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.4/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
2.7/13.5	Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	2
top_contributor_share	0.938

Issue & PR responsiveness

48Weak

How it's scored

30.5/42	Issue resolution — 73% of issues closed
11.2/30	PR acceptance — 6/16 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	6
open_issues	3
closed_issues	8
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	0.727
closed_unmerged_prs	10
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

58Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
13.7/25	Owner reach — 80 followers of emilioastarita
22.4/25	Track record — 26 public repos, account ~16 yr old

Inputs used

followers	80
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	emilioastarita
public_repos	26
account_age_days	5,906

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 4 days ago
20/20	Version history — 16 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	facturajs
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

25At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

1Critical

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

60Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 11 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	cuit, afip, nodejs, node-js, facturacion-electronica, facturacion, factura-electronica, cuil, argentina, monotributo, iva
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

37Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

32At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
3.8/7.5	Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 49 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	3.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

58Moderate

How it's scored

10.9/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: node-forge 1.3.1 (high 8.6)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
32.9/40	No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 236 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	80
affected_packages	9
assessed_packages	138
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 8, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 138 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40	Legible commit history — no data

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	—
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

29At Risk

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8	Automated maintenance — no data
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	pnpm-lock.yaml, yarn.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	—
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/11 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	12,431
source_files_sampled	11
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

116GitHub stars

2contributors

12commits, last 12 months

4days since last push

0releases

1bus factor

3open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

deps.dev does not index npm:facturajs@0.4.2; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 116 ★ / 25 ⇿

116Stars

25Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.1 / 10

3.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 10:57 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
5	Maintained	5 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	49 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 6

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	debug	`^4.4.0`	package.json
npm	moment	`^2.30.1`	package.json
npm	node-forge	`^1.4.0`	package.json
npm	ntp-time-sync	`^0.5.0`	package.json
npm	soap	`^1.1.11`	package.json
npm	xml2js	`^0.6.2`	package.json

All dependencies 138

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 129 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	debug	`4.4.0`	direct
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	direct
npm	moment	`2.30.1`	direct
npm	node-forge	`1.3.1`	direct
npm	node-forge	`1.4.0`	direct
npm	ntp-time-sync	`0.5.0`	direct
npm	soap	`1.1.11`	direct
npm	soap	`1.8.0`	direct
npm	xml2js	`0.6.2`	direct
npm	@noble/hashes	`1.8.0`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.scandir	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.stat	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.walk	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	@paralleldrive/cuid2	`2.2.2`	indirect
npm	@paralleldrive/cuid2	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	@ts-morph/common	`0.24.0`	indirect
npm	@types/debug	`4.1.12`	indirect
npm	@types/debug	`4.1.13`	indirect
npm	@types/ms	`0.7.31`	indirect
npm	@types/ms	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`12.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`25.6.0`	indirect
npm	@types/node-forge	`1.3.11`	indirect
npm	@types/node-forge	`1.3.14`	indirect
npm	@types/uniqid	`5.3.4`	indirect
npm	@types/xml2js	`0.4.14`	indirect
npm	@xmldom/is-dom-node	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@xmldom/xmldom	`0.8.10`	indirect
npm	@xmldom/xmldom	`0.8.12`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	asap	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	asynckit	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	axios	`1.15.0`	indirect
npm	axios	`1.8.4`	indirect
npm	axios-ntlm	`1.4.4`	indirect
npm	axios-ntlm	`1.4.6`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	braces	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	buffer-from	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	camelcase	`6.3.0`	indirect
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	cliui	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	code-block-writer	`13.0.3`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	combined-stream	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	delayed-stream	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	des.js	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	dev-null	`0.1.1`	indirect
npm	dezalgo	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	es-set-tostringtag	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	fast-glob	`3.3.3`	indirect
npm	fastq	`1.20.1`	indirect
npm	fill-range	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	follow-redirects	`1.15.9`	indirect
npm	follow-redirects	`1.16.0`	indirect
npm	form-data	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	form-data	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	formidable	`3.5.4`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	get-stream	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	has-tostringtag	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-number	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-md4	`0.3.2`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.17.21`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	merge2	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	micromatch	`4.0.8`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.40.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.52.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.24`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.35`	indirect
npm	minimalistic-assert	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`9.0.9`	indirect
npm	mkdirp	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	ntp-packet-parser	`0.5.0`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	path-browserify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`2.3.2`	indirect
npm	prettier	`3.5.3`	indirect
npm	prettier	`3.8.2`	indirect
npm	proxy-from-env	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	proxy-from-env	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	queue-microtask	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	require-directory	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	reusify	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	run-parallel	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	sanitize-filename	`1.6.4`	indirect
npm	sax	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	sax	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	sax	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-support	`0.5.21`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-bom	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`8.1.1`	indirect
npm	to-regex-range	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	truncate-utf8-bytes	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	ts-morph	`23.0.0`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.8.3`	indirect
npm	typescript	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`7.19.2`	indirect
npm	uniqid	`5.4.0`	indirect
npm	utf8-byte-length	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	whatwg-mimetype	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	wsdl-tsclient	`1.7.1`	indirect
npm	xml-crypto	`6.1.2`	indirect
npm	xmlbuilder	`11.0.1`	indirect
npm	xpath	`0.0.33`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yargs	`17.7.3`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`21.1.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 9

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 138 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 9 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
node-forge	`1.3.1`	direct	high	7	`1.4.0`
@xmldom/xmldom	`0.8.10`	indirect	high	5	`0.9.10`
@xmldom/xmldom	`0.8.12`	indirect	high	4	`0.9.10`
axios	`1.15.0`	indirect	high	28	`1.18.0`
axios	`1.8.4`	indirect	high	29	`1.18.0`
form-data	`4.0.0`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.6`
form-data	`4.0.5`	indirect	high	1	`4.0.6`
lodash	`4.17.21`	indirect	high	3	`4.18.0`
follow-redirects	`1.15.9`	indirect	moderate	1	`1.16.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.18.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records