Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 10:54 UTC

emmanpbarrameda / filament-take-picture-field

filament-take-picture-field by emmanpbarrameda

JavaScript · PHP · BladeMIT★ 37 stars⑂ 12 forkssince Apr 2025View on GitHub ↗

emmanpbarrameda/filament-take-picture-field holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (68/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (33/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

62
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

62
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

EMMANPersonal account
82 followers74 public repossince Jun 2020

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

68Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence — 6/52 weeks with commits
13.3/18Commit volume — 29 commits in the last year
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
commits_last_year29
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year6
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 6 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~110 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count6
latest_release_tagv1.4.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases110
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/60Stars — 37 stars
8.7/25Forks — 12 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks12
stars37
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges12
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
44.8/80Monthly downloads — 2,305 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesemmanpbarrameda/filament-take-picture-field
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads16,221
monthly_downloads2,305
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 81% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.812
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
16.4/30PR acceptance — 6/11 decided PRs merged
6.5/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/4 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs6
open_issues0
closed_issues12
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d5
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d5
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d4
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
13.8/25Owner reach — 82 followers of emmanpbarrameda
25/25Track record — 74 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers82
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginemmanpbarrameda
public_repos74
account_age_days2,308
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 6 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesemmanpbarrameda/filament-take-picture-field
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://filamentphp.com/plugins/emmanpbarrameda-take-picture-field
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsfilament, filament-take-picture, take-picture-field
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://filamentphp.com/plugins/emmanpbarrameda-take-picture-field
docs_sitehttps://filamentphp.com/plugins/emmanpbarrameda-take-picture-field
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.2/2.5CI-Tests — 2 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
4.5/7.5Maintained — 7 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate3.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages229
unassessed_packages10
affected_by_severitymoderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 229 resolved dependencies against OSV. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

33At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
10.8/40Legible commit history — 13 of 64 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.203
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 64
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/37 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes7,943
source_files_sampled37
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

37GitHub stars
4contributors
29commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
6releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 12 ⇿
0Stars
12Forks
4Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0246810121212025-042025-122026-08
Major 0Minor 3Patch 1

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 10:54 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
5CI-Tests2 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
6Maintained7 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistfilament/forms^4.0|^5.0composer.json
Packagistspatie/laravel-package-tools^1.15.0composer.json
All dependencies 239

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 237 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistfilament/forms—direct
Packagistspatie/laravel-package-tools—direct
npm@awcodes/filament-plugin-purge1.1.2indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.25.12indirect
npm@tailwindcss/forms0.5.11indirect
npm@tailwindcss/typography0.5.20indirect
npmagent-base6.0.2indirect
npmansi-regex6.4.0indirect
npmansi-styles3.2.1indirect
npmarray-buffer-byte-length1.0.2indirect
npmarraybuffer.prototype.slice1.0.4indirect
npmasync-function1.0.0indirect
npmasynckit0.4.0indirect
npmautoprefixer10.6.1indirect
npmavailable-typed-arrays1.0.7indirect
npmaxios1.20.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbaseline-browser-mapping2.11.29indirect
npmbl5.1.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.21indirect
npmbrowserslist4.29.3indirect
npmbuffer6.0.3indirect
npmcall-bind1.0.9indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcall-bound1.0.4indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001816indirect
npmchalk2.4.2indirect
npmchalk5.6.2indirect
npmcli-cursor4.0.0indirect
npmcli-spinners2.9.2indirect
npmclone1.0.4indirect
npmcolor-convert1.9.3indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.3indirect
npmcombined-stream1.0.8indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcross-spawn6.0.6indirect
npmcss-tree2.3.1indirect
npmcssesc3.0.0indirect
npmdata-view-buffer1.0.2indirect
npmdata-view-byte-length1.0.2indirect
npmdata-view-byte-offset1.0.1indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdefaults1.0.4indirect
npmdefine-data-property1.1.4indirect
npmdefine-properties1.2.1indirect
npmdelayed-stream1.0.0indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmelectron-to-chromium1.5.459indirect
npmerror-ex1.3.4indirect
npmes-abstract1.24.2indirect
npmes-abstract-get1.0.0indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.2indirect
npmes-set-tostringtag2.1.0indirect
npmes-to-primitive1.3.4indirect
npmesbuild0.25.12indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp1.0.5indirect
npmfollow-redirects1.16.1indirect
npmfor-each0.3.5indirect
npmform-data4.0.6indirect
npmfraction.js5.3.4indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmfunction.prototype.name1.2.0indirect
npmfunctions-have-names1.2.3indirect
npmgenerator-function2.0.1indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmget-symbol-description1.1.0indirect
npmglobalthis1.0.4indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhas-bigints1.1.0indirect
npmhas-flag3.0.0indirect
npmhas-property-descriptors1.0.2indirect
npmhas-proto1.2.0indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhas-tostringtag1.0.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.4indirect
npmhosted-git-info2.8.9indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent5.0.1indirect
npmieee7541.2.1indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npminternal-slot1.1.0indirect
npmis-array-buffer3.0.5indirect
npmis-arrayish0.2.1indirect
npmis-async-function2.1.1indirect
npmis-bigint1.1.0indirect
npmis-boolean-object1.2.2indirect
npmis-callable1.2.7indirect
npmis-core-module2.17.0indirect
npmis-data-view1.0.2indirect
npmis-date-object1.1.0indirect
npmis-document.all1.0.0indirect
npmis-finalizationregistry1.1.1indirect
npmis-generator-function1.1.2indirect
npmis-interactive2.0.0indirect
npmis-map2.0.3indirect
npmis-negative-zero2.0.3indirect
npmis-number-object1.1.1indirect
npmis-regex1.2.1indirect
npmis-set2.0.3indirect
npmis-shared-array-buffer1.0.4indirect
npmis-string1.1.1indirect
npmis-symbol1.1.1indirect
npmis-typed-array1.1.15indirect
npmis-unicode-supported1.3.0indirect
npmis-weakmap2.0.2indirect
npmis-weakref1.1.1indirect
npmis-weakset2.0.4indirect
npmisarray2.0.5indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjson-parse-better-errors1.0.2indirect
npmload-json-file4.0.0indirect
npmlog-symbols5.1.0indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmdn-data2.0.30indirect
npmmemorystream0.3.1indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmmimic-fn2.1.0indirect
npmmini-svg-data-uri1.4.4indirect
npmminimatch3.1.5indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.20indirect
npmnice-try1.0.5indirect
npmnode-releases2.0.59indirect
npmnormalize-package-data2.5.0indirect
npmnpm-run-all4.1.5indirect
npmobject-inspect1.13.4indirect
npmobject-keys1.1.1indirect
npmobject.assign4.1.7indirect
npmonetime5.1.2indirect
npmora6.3.1indirect
npmown-keys1.0.2indirect
npmparse-json4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key2.0.1indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpath-type3.0.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpidtree0.3.1indirect
npmpify3.0.0indirect
npmpossible-typed-array-names1.1.0indirect
npmpostcss8.5.30indirect
npmpostcss-import15.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-selector-parser6.0.10indirect
npmpostcss-value-parser4.2.0indirect
npmprettier3.9.10indirect
npmprettier-plugin-tailwindcss0.6.14indirect
npmproxy-from-env2.1.0indirect
npmread-cache1.0.2indirect
npmread-pkg3.0.0indirect
npmreadable-stream3.6.2indirect
npmreflect.getprototypeof1.0.10indirect
npmregexp.prototype.flags1.5.4indirect
npmresolve1.22.13indirect
npmrestore-cursor4.0.0indirect
npmsafe-array-concat1.1.4indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsafe-push-apply1.0.0indirect
npmsafe-regex-test1.1.0indirect
npmsemver5.7.2indirect
npmset-function-length1.2.2indirect
npmset-function-name2.0.2indirect
npmset-proto1.0.0indirect
npmshebang-command1.2.0indirect
npmshebang-regex1.0.0indirect
npmshell-quote1.12.0indirect
npmside-channel1.1.1indirect
npmside-channel-list1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-map1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-weakmap1.0.2indirect
npmsignal-exit3.0.7indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.2indirect
npmspdx-correct3.2.0indirect
npmspdx-exceptions2.5.0indirect
npmspdx-expression-parse3.0.1indirect
npmspdx-license-ids3.0.24indirect
npmstdin-discarder0.1.0indirect
npmstop-iteration-iterator1.1.0indirect
npmstring.prototype.padend3.1.6indirect
npmstring.prototype.trim1.2.11indirect
npmstring.prototype.trimend1.0.10indirect
npmstring.prototype.trimstart1.0.8indirect
npmstring_decoder1.3.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.2.0indirect
npmstrip-bom3.0.0indirect
npmsupports-color5.5.0indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmtailwindcss4.3.3indirect
npmtyped-array-buffer1.0.3indirect
npmtyped-array-byte-length1.0.3indirect
npmtyped-array-byte-offset1.0.5indirect
npmtyped-array-length1.0.8indirect
npmunbox-primitive1.1.0indirect
npmupdate-browserslist-db1.3.4indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmvalidate-npm-package-license3.0.4indirect
npmwcwidth1.0.1indirect
npmwhich1.3.1indirect
npmwhich-boxed-primitive1.1.1indirect
npmwhich-builtin-type1.2.1indirect
npmwhich-collection1.0.2indirect
npmwhich-typed-array1.1.24indirect
Packagistfilament/filament—indirect
Packagistlaravel/framework—indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/collision—indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench—indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest—indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-arch—indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-laravel—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 229 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
postcss-selector-parser6.0.10indirectmoderate17.1.6

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.