Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-08 03:53 UTC

entur / vite-plugin-assets-json

A vite plugin to generate the required `assets.json` file

TypeScript · JavaScriptNo license detected★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Feb 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryPluginhow this is determined

entur/vite-plugin-assets-json holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (85/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (25/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Entur ASOrganization · verified domain
189 followers300 public repossince Nov 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@entur/vite-plugin-assets-json0.0.123,8081147 days agoenturjsonassetsassets.jsonmanifest.jsonmanifestbuildvitevite-pluginvitejsplugin

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

85Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
17.3/36Commit cadence — 25/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 144 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year144
human_commit_share0.03
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year25
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 11 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 47 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~103 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count11
latest_release_tagvite-plugin-assets-json-v0.0.12
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release47
mean_days_between_releases103
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

25At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
47.7/80Monthly downloads — 3,808 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@entur/vite-plugin-assets-json
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,808
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 78% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.784
How it's scored
21/42Issue resolution — 50% of issues closed
24.7/30PR acceptance — 168/204 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs168
open_issues1
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.5
closed_unmerged_prs36
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
16.4/25Owner reach — 189 followers of entur
25/25Track record — 300 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers189
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginentur
public_repos300
account_age_days3,626

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 47 days ago
20/20Version history — 11 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@entur/vite-plugin-assets-json
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish47

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

64Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

73Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — no data
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Code-Review, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages187
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 187 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

45Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 96 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.96
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/4 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes3,475
source_files_sampled4
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
4contributors
144commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
11releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10
6.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-08 03:52 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
n/aCode-ReviewFound no human activity in the last 30 changesets
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 187

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 187 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@babel/code-frame8.0.0indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier8.0.4indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/remapping2.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/set-array1.2.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/source-map0.3.6indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.6.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-x64-gnu1.5.1indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.151.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-android-arm-eabi0.71.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-android-arm640.71.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-darwin-arm640.71.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-darwin-x640.71.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-freebsd-x640.71.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf0.71.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-arm-musleabihf0.71.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-arm64-gnu0.71.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-arm64-musl0.71.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu0.71.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-riscv64-gnu0.71.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-riscv64-musl0.71.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-s390x-gnu0.71.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-x64-gnu0.71.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-x64-musl0.71.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-openharmony-arm640.71.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-win32-arm64-msvc0.71.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-win32-ia32-msvc0.71.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-win32-x64-msvc0.71.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-android-arm-eabi1.86.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-android-arm641.86.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-darwin-arm641.86.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-darwin-x641.86.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-freebsd-x641.86.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.86.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-musleabihf1.86.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.86.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.86.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.86.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-gnu1.86.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-musl1.86.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.86.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.86.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-musl1.86.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-openharmony-arm641.86.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.86.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-win32-ia32-msvc1.86.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.86.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm-eabi1.2.11indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.11indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.11indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.11indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.11indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.11indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.11indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.11indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.11indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.11indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.11indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.11indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.11indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.11indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.11indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.0indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-commonjs29.0.3indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-node-resolve16.0.3indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-terser1.0.0indirect
npm@rollup/pluginutils4.2.1indirect
npm@rollup/pluginutils5.1.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.64.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.64.0indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/node24.19.1indirect
npm@types/resolve1.20.2indirect
npm@vitest/mocker5.0.3indirect
npm@vitest/spy5.0.3indirect
npmacorn8.11.3indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmbuffer-from1.1.2indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmcommander2.20.3indirect
npmcommondir1.0.1indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmdeepmerge4.3.1indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.3.2indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.4.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfind-cache-dir3.3.2indirect
npmfind-up4.1.0indirect
npmfs-extra10.1.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmgit-cz4.9.0indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhasown2.0.2indirect
npmis-core-module2.13.1indirect
npmis-module1.0.0indirect
npmis-reference1.2.1indirect
npmjs-tokens10.0.0indirect
npmjsonfile6.1.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlocate-path5.0.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmagic-string1.2.3indirect
npmmagic-string1.4.2indirect
npmmake-dir3.1.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.18indirect
npmobug2.1.4indirect
npmoxfmt0.71.0indirect
npmoxlint1.86.0indirect
npmp-limit2.3.0indirect
npmp-locate4.1.0indirect
npmp-try2.2.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.7indirect
npmpkg-dir4.2.0indirect
npmpostcss8.5.28indirect
npmresolve1.22.8indirect
npmrolldown1.2.11indirect
npmrollup4.64.0indirect
npmrollup-plugin-dts6.5.1indirect
npmrollup-plugin-typescript20.37.0indirect
npmsemver6.3.1indirect
npmsemver7.7.3indirect
npmserialize-javascript7.0.5indirect
npmsmob1.5.0indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmsource-map-support0.5.21indirect
npmstd-env4.2.0indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmterser5.30.3indirect
npmtinybench6.1.4indirect
npmtinyexec1.3.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinypool2.2.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmundici-types7.24.6indirect
npmuniversalify2.0.1indirect
npmvite8.3.2indirect
npmvitest5.0.3indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running3.2.1indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 187 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
source-map-js1.2.1indirecthigh11.2.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.