Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 16:36 UTC

equinor / videx-math

A library with math used by Videx.

TypeScript · JavaScriptMIT★ 1 star⑂ 2 forkssince Oct 2019View on GitHub ↗

equinor/videx-math holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (42/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

EquinorOrganization · verified domain
1,809 followers756 public repossince Dec 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@equinor/videx-math1.1.1210,259246 days agomath

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
22.8/36Commit cadence — 33/52 weeks with commits
16.9/18Commit volume — 76 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year76
human_commit_share0.53
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year33

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 11 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 6 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~30 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count11
latest_release_tagv1.1.12
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases30
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

42Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars1
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
53.5/80Monthly downloads — 10,259 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@equinor/videx-math
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads10,259
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

81Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 40% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 10 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled10
top_contributor_share0.404
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
15.3/30PR acceptance — 90/176 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs90
open_issues0
closed_issues9
prs_merged_7d5
prs_decided_7d5
prs_merged_30d9
prs_decided_30d9
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs86
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
23.4/25Owner reach — 1,809 followers of equinor
25/25Track record — 756 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,809
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginequinor
public_repos756
account_age_days5,751

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 6 days ago
20/20Version history — 24 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@equinor/videx-math
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish6

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

90Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

87Excellent
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate8.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages2
assessed_packages185
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitymoderate 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 185 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 46 of 53 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.868
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 38 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.38
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/11 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes43,599
source_files_sampled11
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1GitHub stars
10contributors
76commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
11releases
2bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks
4Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212026-012026-042026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 4
OpenSSF Scorecard 8.7 / 10
8.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 16:36 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 185

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 185 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.8indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.8indirect
npm@bcoe/v8-coverage1.0.2indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.2indirect
npm@gerrit0/mini-shiki3.23.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/source-map0.3.6indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.6indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.139.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-android-arm-eabi1.82.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-android-arm641.82.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-darwin-arm641.82.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-darwin-x641.82.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-freebsd-x641.82.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.82.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-musleabihf1.82.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.82.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.82.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.82.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-gnu1.82.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-musl1.82.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.82.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.82.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-musl1.82.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-openharmony-arm641.82.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.82.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-win32-ia32-msvc1.82.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.82.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.1.5indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-terser1.0.0indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-typescript12.3.0indirect
npm@rollup/pluginutils5.1.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.60.0indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-oniguruma3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/langs3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/themes3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/types3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/vscode-textmate10.0.2indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.3indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/hast3.0.4indirect
npm@types/unist3.0.3indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v84.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.10indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.10indirect
npmacorn8.15.0indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmast-v8-to-istanbul1.0.6indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.9indirect
npmbuffer-from1.1.1indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmcommander2.20.3indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmentities4.5.0indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.3.1indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.4.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhasown2.0.2indirect
npmhtml-escaper2.0.2indirect
npmis-core-module2.16.1indirect
npmistanbul-lib-coverage3.2.2indirect
npmistanbul-lib-report3.0.1indirect
npmistanbul-reports3.2.0indirect
npmjs-tokens10.0.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlinkify-it5.0.2indirect
npmlunr2.3.9indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmagicast0.5.4indirect
npmmake-dir4.0.0indirect
npmmarkdown-it14.3.0indirect
npmmdurl2.0.0indirect
npmminimatch10.2.4indirect
npmnanoid3.3.18indirect
npmobug2.1.4indirect
npmoxlint1.82.0indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmpostcss8.5.25indirect
npmprettier3.9.6indirect
npmpunycode.js2.3.1indirect
npmresolve1.22.8indirect
npmrolldown1.1.5indirect
npmrollup4.60.0indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmserialize-javascript7.0.5indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsmob1.5.0indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmsource-map-support0.5.21indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmterser5.31.6indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.2.4indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypedoc0.28.18indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmuc.micro2.1.0indirect
npmvite8.1.5indirect
npmvitest4.1.10indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmyaml2.8.3indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 185 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
@vitest/mocker4.1.10indirectmoderate15.0.0-rc.2
vitest4.1.10indirectmoderate15.0.0-rc.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.