Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-07-26 17:19 UTC

eternal-flame-AD / gotify-broadcast

A plugin which brings broadcasts to gotify.

GoMIT★ 84 stars⑂ 8 forkssince Feb 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

eternal-flame-AD/gotify-broadcast holds a health index of 53 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (63/100) and lowest on Security (30/100). It was last updated 7 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

53
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

53
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 52 is calibrated to 53 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

饺子w (Yumechi)Personal account
147 followers196 public repossince Jan 2018友愛園 教員

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/eternal-flame-AD/gotify-broadcastv0.3.13-177 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

57Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 7 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence — 6/52 weeks with commits
10.8/18Commit volume — 15 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year15
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push7
active_weeks_last_year6
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 11 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 157 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~282.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count11
latest_release_tagv0.3.11
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release157
mean_days_between_releases282.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
31.1/60Stars — 84 stars
7/25Forks — 8 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks8
stars84
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 97% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.968
How it's scored
34.6/42Issue resolution — 82% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance — 1/1 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues3
closed_issues14
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.824
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
15.6/25Owner reach — 147 followers of eternal-flame-AD
25/25Track record — 196 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers147
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_logineternal-flame-AD
public_repos196
account_age_days3,111
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 7 days ago
20/20Version history — 17 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/eternal-flame-AD/gotify-broadcast
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish7

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

63Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgotify, gotify-plugin, self-hosted
has_wikiyes
homepage
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

30At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 49 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate2.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
7.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: github.com/go-git/go-git/v5 v5.12.0 (critical 9.8)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
32.1/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 566 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories83
affected_packages6
assessed_packages28
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 1, moderate 2, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 28 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

49Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
5.9/40Legible commit history — 5 of 45 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share0.111
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 45
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod, upstream-follower/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/23 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes12,421
source_files_sampled23
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

84GitHub stars
2contributors
15commits, last 12 months
7days since last push
11releases
1bus factor
3open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 8 ⇿
0Stars
8Forks
5Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468812020-052022-122025-08
Major 0Minor 1Patch 4

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.4 / 10
2.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-26 17:18 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities49 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/gin-gonic/ginv1.10.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gotify/plugin-apiv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/tablewriterv0.0.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/smartystreets/goconveyv1.8.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-git/v5v5.12.0upstream-follower/go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/go-github/v63v63.0.0upstream-follower/go.mod
All dependencies 28

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 22 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/gin-gonic/gin1.10.0direct
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-git/v5v5.12.0direct
Gogithub.com/google/go-github/v63v63.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/gotify/plugin-api1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/tablewriter0.0.5direct
Gogithub.com/smartystreets/goconvey1.8.1direct
Godario.cat/mergov1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudflare/circlv1.3.7indirect
Gogithub.com/cyphar/filepath-securejoinv0.2.4indirect
Gogithub.com/emirpasic/godsv1.18.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-git/gcfgv1.5.1-0.20230307220236-3a3c6141e376indirect
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-billy/v5v5.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/groupcachev0.0.0-20210331224755-41bb18bfe9daindirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-querystringv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jbenet/go-contextv0.0.0-20150711004518-d14ea06fba99indirect
Gogithub.com/kevinburke/ssh_configv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/microsoft/go-winiov0.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pjbgf/sha1cdv0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/protonmail/go-cryptov1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sergi/go-diffv1.3.2-0.20230802210424-5b0b94c5c0d3indirect
Gogithub.com/skeema/knownhostsv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/xanzy/ssh-agentv0.3.3indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.21.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.12.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.18.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.13.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/warnings.v0v0.1.2indirect
Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 28 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
github.com/go-git/go-git/v5v5.12.0directcritical206.0.0-alpha.4
golang.org/x/cryptov0.21.0indirectcritical360.52.0
github.com/go-git/go-billy/v5v5.5.0indirecthigh46.0.0-alpha.1
github.com/cloudflare/circlv1.3.7indirectmoderate41.6.3
golang.org/x/netv0.22.0indirectmoderate181.26.3
golang.org/x/sysv0.18.0indirectunknown10.44.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.