Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 17:03 UTC

eugeneshilow / tokmax

What would your AI coding subscription cost at API prices? npx tokmax reads your local usage logs and puts your number on a public leaderboard. Only aggregates leave your machine.

TypeScript · JavaScriptNo license detected★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfaceLibraryhow this is determined

eugeneshilow/tokmax holds a health index of 39 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (62/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (25/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

39
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

39
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 43 is calibrated to 39 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Evgeny ShilovPersonal account
44 followers31 public repossince Nov 2016

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmtokmax0.9.184,921283 days agocodexclaude-codetokensusageleaderboardtokenmaxvibecodinglitellmccusage

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

34At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

56Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence — 4/52 weeks with commits
17.7/18Commit volume — 92 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year92
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year4

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

25At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

62Moderate
How it's scored
49.2/80Monthly downloads — 4,921 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagestokmax
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads4,921
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

47Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

10Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

40Weak
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
18/30PR acceptance — 18/30 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs18
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs12
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

56Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
11.9/25Owner reach — 44 followers of eugeneshilow
23/25Track record — 31 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers44
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logineugeneshilow
public_repos31
account_age_days3,537
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history — 28 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestokmax
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

44Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://tokmax.dev
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://tokmax.dev
docs_sitehttps://tokmax.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

51Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

32At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

29At Risk
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — web/convex/tsconfig.json, web/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsweb/convex/tsconfig.json, web/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/49 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes39,980
source_files_sampled49
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
92commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 17:03 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmconvex^1.41.0web/package.json
npmlucide-react^1.17.0web/package.json
npmnext16.2.9web/package.json
npmreact^19.2.7web/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.7web/package.json
All dependencies 128

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 123 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmconvex1.42.0direct
npmlucide-react1.21.0direct
npmnext16.2.9direct
npmreact19.2.7direct
npmreact-dom19.2.7direct
npm@alloc/quick-lru5.2.0indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.1indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.27.0indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.27.0indirect
npm@img/colour1.1.0indirect
npm@img/sharp-darwin-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-darwin-x640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-x641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm1.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-ppc641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-riscv641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-s390x1.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-x641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-x641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-arm0.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-ppc640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-riscv640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-s390x0.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-x640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linuxmusl-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linuxmusl-x640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-wasm320.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-ia320.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-x640.34.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/remapping2.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@next/env16.2.9indirect
npm@next/swc-darwin-arm6416.2.9indirect
npm@next/swc-darwin-x6416.2.9indirect
npm@next/swc-linux-arm64-gnu16.2.9indirect
npm@next/swc-linux-arm64-musl16.2.9indirect
npm@next/swc-linux-x64-gnu16.2.9indirect
npm@next/swc-linux-x64-musl16.2.9indirect
npm@next/swc-win32-arm64-msvc16.2.9indirect
npm@next/swc-win32-x64-msvc16.2.9indirect
npm@swc/helpers0.5.15indirect
npm@tailwindcss/node4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-android-arm644.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-arm644.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-x644.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-freebsd-x644.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-gnu4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-musl4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-gnu4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-musl4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-wasm32-wasi4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-arm64-msvc4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-x64-msvc4.3.1indirect
npm@tailwindcss/postcss4.3.1indirect
npm@types/node24.13.2indirect
npm@types/react19.2.17indirect
npm@types/react-dom19.2.3indirect
npmbaseline-browser-mapping2.10.40indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001799indirect
npmclient-only0.0.1indirect
npmcsstype3.2.3indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmenhanced-resolve5.21.6indirect
npmesbuild0.27.0indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmjiti2.7.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmnanoid3.3.15indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.16indirect
npmprettier3.8.5indirect
npmscheduler0.27.0indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmsharp0.34.5indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstyled-jsx5.1.6indirect
npmtailwindcss4.3.1indirect
npmtapable2.3.3indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmundici-types7.18.2indirect
npmws8.21.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with eugeneshilow/tokmax. Read them side by side →

84Piebald-AI/splitrailFast, cross-platform, real-time token usage tracker and cost monitor for Claude Code / Codex CLI / Antigravity CLI / Qwen Code / Cline / Zoo Code / Kilo Code / GitHub Copilot / OpenCode / Pi Agent / Piebald.Excellent98awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional97github/gh-awGitHub Agentic WorkflowsExceptional95openclaw/acpxHeadless CLI client for stateful Agent Client Protocol (ACP) sessionsExceptional95NousResearch/hermes-agentThe agent that grows with youExceptional94diegosouzapw/OmniRouteNever stop coding. Free MIT AI gateway: one endpoint, 290+ providers (90+ free), 500+ models — Kimi, Claude, GPT, OpenAI, Gemini, GLM, DeepSeek, MiniMax. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Cline & Copilot. Quota-aware auto-fallback, RTK+Caveman compression saves 15-95% tokens, MCP/A2A, Desktop/PWA. Built by 500+ contributorsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.