Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-04 18:41 UTC

expressjs / express

Fast, unopinionated, minimalist web framework for node.

JavaScriptMIT★ 69,311 stars⑂ 24,545 forkssince Jun 2009View on GitHub ↗

expressjs/express holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (97/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (55/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

96
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

96
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 84 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

expressjsOrganization
2,590 followers50 public repossince Oct 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmexpress5.2.1505,868,878288245 days agoexpressframeworksinatrawebhttprestrestfulrouterappapi

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 3 days ago
20.1/36Commit cadence29/52 weeks with commits
17.3/18Commit volume84 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained17 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year84
human_commit_share0.61
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year29
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 84 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~67.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv4.22.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release84
mean_days_between_releases67.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

97Exceptional · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

100Exceptional
How it's scored
60/60Stars69,311 stars
25/25Forks24,545 forks
15/15Watchers1,714 watchers
Inputs used
forks24,545
stars69,311
watchers1,714
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads505,868,878 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesexpress
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads505,868,878
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 68% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 109 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.677
How it's scored
40.9/42Issue resolution97% of issues closed
6.7/30PR acceptance550/2,480 decided PRs merged
2/13Newcomer PR acceptance2/13 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs550
open_issues105
closed_issues3,960
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d25
issue_closed_ratio0.974
closed_unmerged_prs1,930
first_time_authors_30d12
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d13
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
24.5/25Owner reach2,590 followers of expressjs
24.4/25Track record50 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,590
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginexpressjs
public_repos50
account_age_days4,681
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
26/35Publish recencylatest publish 245 days ago
20/20Version history288 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesexpress
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish245

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.eslintrc.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://expressjs.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjavascript, nodejs, express, server
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://expressjs.com
docs_sitehttps://expressjs.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

91Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

89Excellent
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 109 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained17 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
3/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate8.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages68
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:express@5.2.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 68 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history58 of 61 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.951
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.eslintrc.yml
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
2/10Demonstrated agent practice1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance39 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.39
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/141 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes29,831
source_files_sampled141
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

69,311GitHub stars
99contributors
84commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
105open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-07-21: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 69311 stars today.
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 22 authors (cap 12)

More detail

Star and fork history 69,228 ★ / 24,545 ⇿
69,228Stars
24,545Forks
1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-21. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

20,00030,00040,00050,00060,00070,00069,22824,545702026-022026-052026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 1
OpenSSF Scorecard 8.9 / 10
8.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-04 18:41 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 109 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained17 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
6Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 28
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmaccepts^2.0.0package.json
npmbody-parser^2.2.1package.json
npmcontent-disposition^2.0.1package.json
npmcontent-type^2.0.0package.json
npmcookie^0.7.1package.json
npmcookie-signature^1.2.1package.json
npmdebug^4.4.0package.json
npmdepd^2.0.0package.json
npmencodeurl^2.0.0package.json
npmescape-html^1.0.3package.json
npmetag^1.8.1package.json
npmfinalhandler^2.1.0package.json
npmfresh^2.0.0package.json
npmhttp-errors^2.0.0package.json
npmmerge-descriptors^2.0.0package.json
npmmime-types^3.0.0package.json
npmon-finished^2.4.1package.json
npmonce^1.4.0package.json
npmparseurl^1.3.3package.json
npmproxy-addr^2.0.7package.json
npmqs^6.15.2package.json
npmrange-parser^1.2.1package.json
npmrouter^2.2.0package.json
npmsend^1.1.0package.json
npmserve-static^2.2.0package.json
npmstatuses^2.0.1package.json
npmtype-is^2.1.0package.json
npmvary^1.1.2package.json
All dependencies 44

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 28 direct and 16 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmaccepts^2.0.0direct
npmbody-parser^2.2.1direct
npmcontent-disposition^2.0.1direct
npmcontent-type^2.0.0direct
npmcookie^0.7.1direct
npmcookie-signature^1.2.1direct
npmdebug^4.4.0direct
npmdepd^2.0.0direct
npmencodeurl^2.0.0direct
npmescape-html^1.0.3direct
npmetag^1.8.1direct
npmfinalhandler^2.1.0direct
npmfresh^2.0.0direct
npmhttp-errors^2.0.0direct
npmmerge-descriptors^2.0.0direct
npmmime-types^3.0.0direct
npmon-finished^2.4.1direct
npmonce^1.4.0direct
npmparseurl^1.3.3direct
npmproxy-addr^2.0.7direct
npmqs^6.15.2direct
npmrange-parser^1.2.1direct
npmrouter^2.2.0direct
npmsend^1.1.0direct
npmserve-static^2.2.0direct
npmstatuses^2.0.1direct
npmtype-is^2.1.0direct
npmvary^1.1.2direct
npmafter0.8.2indirect
npmconnect-redis^8.0.1indirect
npmcookie-parser1.4.7indirect
npmcookie-session2.1.1indirect
npmejs^3.1.10indirect
npmeslint8.47.0indirect
npmexpress-session^1.18.1indirect
npmhbs4.2.1indirect
npmmarked^15.0.3indirect
npmmethod-override3.0.0indirect
npmmocha^11.7.5indirect
npmmorgan1.11.0indirect
npmnyc^17.1.0indirect
npmpbkdf2-password1.2.1indirect
npmsupertest^6.3.0indirect
npmvhost~3.0.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:express@5.2.1 pulls in 68 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.