Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 19:46 UTC

eza-community / eza

A modern alternative to ls

RustEUPL-1.2★ 23,291 stars⑂ 522 forkssince Jul 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

eza-community/eza holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (83/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (64/100). It was last updated 40 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ezaOrganization
218 followers6 public repossince Aug 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioeza0.23.510,7159759 days agocommand-line-utilities

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

67Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 40 days ago
11.1/36Commit cadence — 16/52 weeks with commits
14.5/18Commit volume — 40 commits in the last year
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
commits_last_year40
human_commit_share0.96
days_since_last_push40
active_weeks_last_year16
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 96 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 69 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~42.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count96
latest_release_tagv0.23.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release69
mean_days_between_releases42.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

83Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 23,291 stars
22.6/25Forks — 522 forks
8.8/15Watchers — 39 watchers
Inputs used
forks522
stars23,291
watchers39
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (EUPL-1.2)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
53.7/80Monthly downloads — 10,715 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageseza
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads522,547
monthly_downloads10,715
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 38% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 54 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.385
How it's scored
24.4/42Issue resolution — 58% of issues closed
22.9/30PR acceptance — 701/918 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 9/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs701
open_issues291
closed_issues405
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.582
closed_unmerged_prs217
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
16.8/25Owner reach — 218 followers of eza-community
12.4/25Track record — 6 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers218
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logineza-community
public_repos6
account_age_days1,139

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 59 days ago
20/20Version history — 97 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageseza
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish59

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 12 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://eza.rocks
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscolor, command-line, files, icons, ls, nerd-fonts, rust, terminal, tools, hacktoberfest
has_wikino
homepagehttps://eza.rocks
docs_sitehttps://eza.rocks
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

67Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 12 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 9/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 54 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
6/7.5Maintained — 10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages215
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 215 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 96 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — justfile, tests/itest/exa/sssssssssssssssssssssssssggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Nix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesjustfile, tests/itest/exa/sssssssssssssssssssssssssggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.04
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
54.3/55Manageable file sizes — 1/74 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes63,903
source_files_sampled74
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

23,291GitHub stars
99contributors
40commits, last 12 months
40days since last push
96releases
2bus factor
291open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 522 ⇿
0Stars
522Forks
92Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010020030040050060051892023-082025-022026-09
Major 0Minor 13Patch 79

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 19:45 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests12 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 9/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 54 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
8Maintained10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 25
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iorayon1.10.0Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4.40Cargo.toml
crates.ionu-ansi-term0.50.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioglob0.3Cargo.toml
crates.iolibc0.2Cargo.toml
crates.iolocale0.2Cargo.toml
crates.iolog0.4Cargo.toml
crates.ionatord-plus-plus2.0Cargo.toml
crates.iopath-clean1.0.1Cargo.toml
crates.iounit-prefix0.5.2Cargo.toml
crates.iopalette=0.7.5Cargo.toml
crates.iopercent-encoding2.3.1Cargo.toml
crates.iophf0.13.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioplist1.7.0Cargo.toml
crates.iouutils_term_grid0.7.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioterminal_size0.4.2Cargo.toml
crates.iotimeago0.6.0Cargo.toml
crates.iounicode-width0.2Cargo.toml
crates.ioansi-width0.1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.219Cargo.toml
crates.iodirs6.0.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_norway0.9Cargo.toml
crates.iobacktrace0.3Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4.5.38Cargo.toml
crates.iogit20.21Cargo.toml
All dependencies 215

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 26 direct and 189 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioansi-width0.1.0direct
crates.iobacktrace0.3.76direct
crates.iochrono0.4.43direct
crates.ioclap4.5.59direct
crates.iodirs6.0.0direct
crates.iogit20.21.0direct
crates.ioglob0.3.3direct
crates.iolibc0.2.182direct
crates.iolocale0.2.2direct
crates.iolog0.4.29direct
crates.ionatord-plus-plus2.0.0direct
crates.ionu-ansi-term0.50.3direct
crates.iopalette0.7.5direct
crates.iopath-clean1.0.1direct
crates.iopercent-encoding2.3.2direct
crates.iophf0.13.1direct
crates.ioplist1.10.0direct
crates.iorayon1.11.0direct
crates.ioserde1.0.228direct
crates.ioserde_norway0.9.42direct
crates.ioterminal_size0.4.3direct
crates.iotimeago0.6.0direct
crates.iounicode-width0.1.14direct
crates.iounicode-width0.2.2direct
crates.iounit-prefix0.5.2direct
crates.iouutils_term_grid0.7.0direct
crates.ioaddr2line0.25.1indirect
crates.ioadler22.0.1indirect
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioalloca0.4.0indirect
crates.ioandroid_system_properties0.1.5indirect
crates.ioanes0.1.6indirect
crates.ioanstream0.6.21indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.13indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse0.2.7indirect
crates.ioanstyle-query1.1.5indirect
crates.ioanstyle-wincon3.0.11indirect
crates.ioanyhow1.0.101indirect
crates.ioapprox0.5.1indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.0indirect
crates.ioautomod1.0.16indirect
crates.iobase640.22.1indirect
crates.iobitflags2.11.0indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.19.1indirect
crates.ioby_address1.2.1indirect
crates.iocast0.3.0indirect
crates.iocc1.2.56indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iociborium0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-io0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-ll0.2.2indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.5.59indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.5.55indirect
crates.ioclap_lex1.0.0indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.4indirect
crates.iocontent_inspector0.2.4indirect
crates.iocore-foundation-sys0.8.7indirect
crates.iocriterion0.8.2indirect
crates.iocriterion-plot0.8.2indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.6indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.20indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.21indirect
crates.iocrunchy0.2.4indirect
crates.ioderanged0.5.6indirect
crates.iodirs-sys0.5.0indirect
crates.iodunce1.0.5indirect
crates.ioeither1.15.0indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.iofast-srgb81.0.0indirect
crates.iofastrand2.3.0indirect
crates.iofiletime0.2.27indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.9indirect
crates.iofoldhash0.1.5indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.2.17indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.3.4indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.1indirect
crates.iogimli0.32.3indirect
crates.iohalf2.7.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.15.5indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.16.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.iohumantime2.3.0indirect
crates.iohumantime-serde1.1.1indirect
crates.ioiana-time-zone0.1.65indirect
crates.ioiana-time-zone-haiku0.1.2indirect
crates.ioid-arena2.3.0indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.13.0indirect
crates.iois_terminal_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.ioitertools0.13.0indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.17indirect
crates.iojobserver0.1.34indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.85indirect
crates.ioleb128fmt0.1.0indirect
crates.iolibgit2-sys0.18.5+1.9.4indirect
crates.iolibredox0.1.12indirect
crates.iolibz-sys1.1.23indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.11.0indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.0indirect
crates.iominiz_oxide0.8.9indirect
crates.ionormalize-line-endings0.3.0indirect
crates.ionum-conv0.2.0indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioobject0.37.3indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.3indirect
crates.ioonce_cell_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.iooorandom11.1.5indirect
crates.ioopenssl-src300.5.5+3.5.5indirect
crates.ioopenssl-sys0.9.111indirect
crates.iooption-ext0.2.0indirect
crates.ioos_pipe1.2.3indirect
crates.iopage_size0.6.0indirect
crates.iopalette_derive0.7.6indirect
crates.iopartition-identity0.3.0indirect
crates.iophf_generator0.13.1indirect
crates.iophf_macros0.13.1indirect
crates.iophf_shared0.13.1indirect
crates.iopkg-config0.3.32indirect
crates.ioplotters0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-backend0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-svg0.3.7indirect
crates.iopowerfmt0.2.0indirect
crates.ioprettyplease0.2.37indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.ioproc-mounts0.3.0indirect
crates.ioquick-xml0.41.0indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.44indirect
crates.ior-efi5.3.0indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.13.0indirect
crates.ioredox_syscall0.7.1indirect
crates.ioredox_users0.5.2indirect
crates.ioregex1.12.3indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.14indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.9indirect
crates.iorustc-demangle0.1.27indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.3indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.22indirect
crates.ioryu1.0.23indirect
crates.iosame-file1.0.6indirect
crates.iosemver1.0.27indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.149indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned1.0.4indirect
crates.ioshlex1.3.0indirect
crates.iosimilar2.7.0indirect
crates.iosiphasher1.0.2indirect
crates.iosnapbox1.0.0indirect
crates.iosnapbox-macros1.0.0indirect
crates.iostrsim0.11.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.116indirect
crates.iotempfile3.25.0indirect
crates.iothiserror1.0.69indirect
crates.iothiserror2.0.18indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl1.0.69indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.18indirect
crates.iotime0.3.47indirect
crates.iotime-core0.1.8indirect
crates.iotime-macros0.2.27indirect
crates.iotinytemplate1.2.1indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime0.7.5+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_edit0.23.10+spec-1.0.0indirect
crates.iotoml_parser1.0.9+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_writer1.0.6+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotrycmd1.0.0indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iounicode-xid0.2.6indirect
crates.iounsafe-libyaml-norway0.2.15indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.2indirect
crates.iouzers0.12.2indirect
crates.iovcpkg0.2.15indirect
crates.iowait-timeout0.2.1indirect
crates.iowalkdir2.5.0indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.2+wasi-0.2.9indirect
crates.iowasip30.4.0+wasi-0.3.0-rc-2026-01-06indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.108indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.108indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.108indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.108indirect
crates.iowasm-encoder0.244.0indirect
crates.iowasm-metadata0.244.0indirect
crates.iowasmparser0.244.0indirect
crates.ioweb-sys0.3.85indirect
crates.iowinapi0.3.9indirect
crates.iowinapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.11indirect
crates.iowinapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowindows-core0.62.2indirect
crates.iowindows-implement0.60.2indirect
crates.iowindows-interface0.59.3indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-result0.4.1indirect
crates.iowindows-strings0.5.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.60.2indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.53.5indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.53.1indirect
crates.iowinnow0.7.14indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-core0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-rust0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-rust-macro0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-component0.244.0indirect
crates.iowit-parser0.244.0indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.39indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.39indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.21indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 215 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
anyhow1.0.101indirectunknown11.0.103

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.