Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 00:44 UTC

fabasoad / translation-action

GitHub action that translates any text to any language supported by chosen provider.

TypeScriptMIT★ 52 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Mar 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#github-actions#github-action#translation-action#translation#translate#deepl-translator#funtranslation-api#google-translate#libretranslate#microsoft-translator#mymemorytranslator#linguatools

fabasoad/translation-action holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (97/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (48/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

EugenePersonal account
50 followers98 public repossince Aug 2012Woven by Toyota

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

97Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

95Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
31.2/36Commit cadence — 45/52 weeks with commits
17.7/18Commit volume — 92 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year92
human_commit_share0.77
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year45

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 53 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 19 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~21.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count53
latest_release_tagv4.2.8
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release19
mean_days_between_releases21.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

34At Risk
How it's scored
27.7/60Stars — 52 stars
5.8/25Forks — 6 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars52
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

15Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.995

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
23.8/30PR acceptance — 157/198 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs157
open_issues0
closed_issues3
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs41
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

59Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12.3/25Owner reach — 50 followers of fabasoad
25/25Track record — 98 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers50
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginfabasoad
public_repos98
account_age_days5,151
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — biome.json
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 12 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgithub-actions, github-action, translation-action, translation, translate, deepl-translator, funtranslation-api, google-translate, libretranslate, microsoft-translator, mymemorytranslator, linguatools
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

73Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

66Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
4.5/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages214
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitymoderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 214 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 77 of 77 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.aws.amazon.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

80Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — biome.json
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 22 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.22

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/25 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes4,384
source_files_sampled25
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

52GitHub stars
2contributors
92commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
53releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package 'translation-action' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿
0Stars
6Forks
36Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

123456612020-082023-042025-12
Major 3Minor 3Patch 30

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10
6.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 00:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
6Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@actions/core~3.0.1package.json
npm@aws-sdk/client-translate~3.1126.0package.json
npmcross-fetch~4.1.0package.json
npmdeepl-node~1.28.0package.json
npmgoogle-translate-api-x~10.7.3package.json
npmtyped-rest-client~3.1.2package.json
All dependencies 214

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 208 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@actions/core3.0.1direct
npm@aws-sdk/client-translate3.1126.0direct
npmcross-fetch4.1.0direct
npmdeepl-node1.28.0direct
npmgoogle-translate-api-x10.7.3direct
npmtyped-rest-client3.1.2direct
npm@actions/exec3.0.0indirect
npm@actions/http-client4.0.1indirect
npm@actions/io3.0.2indirect
npm@aws-sdk/core3.977.9indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-env3.972.70indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-http3.972.72indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-ini3.973.15indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-login3.972.77indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-node3.972.82indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-process3.972.70indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-sso3.973.14indirect
npm@aws-sdk/credential-provider-web-identity3.972.76indirect
npm@aws-sdk/nested-clients3.997.44indirect
npm@aws-sdk/signature-v4-multi-region3.996.46indirect
npm@aws-sdk/token-providers3.1116.0indirect
npm@aws-sdk/types3.974.5indirect
npm@aws-sdk/xml-builder3.972.40indirect
npm@aws/lambda-invoke-store0.3.0indirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.8indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.8indirect
npm@bcoe/v8-coverage1.0.2indirect
npm@biomejs/biome2.5.14indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-darwin-arm642.5.14indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-darwin-x642.5.14indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-arm642.5.14indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-arm64-musl2.5.14indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-x642.5.14indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-x64-musl2.5.14indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-win32-arm642.5.14indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-win32-x642.5.14indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.6.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.148.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm-eabi1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@smithy/core3.33.3indirect
npm@smithy/credential-provider-imds4.5.2indirect
npm@smithy/fetch-http-handler5.8.0indirect
npm@smithy/node-http-handler4.12.1indirect
npm@smithy/signature-v45.7.3indirect
npm@smithy/types4.18.0indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/node26.4.1indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-loong647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-sunos-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-x647.0.2indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v85.0.1indirect
npm@vitest/istanbul-lib-coverage1.0.1indirect
npm@vitest/istanbul-lib-report1.0.1indirect
npm@vitest/mocker5.0.1indirect
npm@vitest/spy5.0.1indirect
npmadm-zip0.6.0indirect
npmagent-base6.0.2indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmast-v8-to-istanbul1.0.5indirect
npmasynckit0.4.0indirect
npmaxios1.20.0indirect
npmbowser2.14.1indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcall-bound1.0.4indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmcombined-stream1.0.8indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdelayed-stream1.0.0indirect
npmdes.js1.1.0indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdotenv17.4.2indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.3.2indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.2indirect
npmes-set-tostringtag2.1.0indirect
npmesbuild0.28.2indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.4.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfollow-redirects1.16.0indirect
npmform-data3.0.5indirect
npmform-data4.0.6indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhas-tostringtag1.0.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.4indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent5.0.1indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmjs-md40.3.2indirect
npmjs-tokens10.0.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmloglevel1.9.2indirect
npmmagic-string1.2.3indirect
npmmagicast0.5.4indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmminimalistic-assert1.0.1indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.18indirect
npmnode-fetch2.7.0indirect
npmobject-inspect1.13.4indirect
npmobug2.1.4indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.7indirect
npmpostcss8.5.28indirect
npmproxy-from-env2.1.0indirect
npmqs6.16.0indirect
npmrolldown1.2.7indirect
npmside-channel1.1.1indirect
npmside-channel-list1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-map1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-weakmap1.0.2indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.2.0indirect
npmtinybench6.1.4indirect
npmtinyexec1.3.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.1indirect
npmtr460.0.3indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtunnel0.0.6indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmunderscore1.13.8indirect
npmundici6.28.0indirect
npmundici-types8.3.0indirect
npmvite8.2.2indirect
npmvitest5.0.1indirect
npmwebidl-conversions3.0.1indirect
npmwhatwg-url5.0.0indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 214 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
adm-zip0.6.0indirectmoderate1—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with fabasoad/translation-action. Read them side by side →

99WeblateOrg/weblateWeb based localization tool with tight version control integration.Exceptional94generaltranslation/gtFull-stack localization for every frameworkExceptional91Azure/setup-helmGithub Action for installing HelmExcellent91formatjs/formatjsThe monorepo home to all of the FormatJS related libraries, most notably react-intl.Excellent90amannn/next-intl🌐 Internationalization (i18n) for Next.js Excellent90JamesIves/github-pages-deploy-action🚀 Automatically deploy your project to GitHub Pages using GitHub Actions. This action can be configured to push your production-ready code into any branch you'd like.Excellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.