Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 03:42 UTC

facebook / akd

An implementation of an auditable key directory

RustApache-2.0★ 335 stars⑂ 78 forkssince Jun 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined

facebook/akd holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (85/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (56/100). It was last updated 35 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MetaOrganization · verified domain
36,748 followers177 public repossince Apr 2009

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioakd0.13.03,4044935 days agoakdkey-transparency
crates.ioxtaskpoints to another repo — not scored0.1.4328579 days agoautomationcodesignmacosreleasextaskcommand-line-utilities
crates.ioakd_core0.13.015,9552535 days agoakdkey-transparency

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

58Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

36Weak
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 35 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
9.7/18Commit volume — 11 commits in the last year
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
commits_last_year11
human_commit_share0.86
days_since_last_push35
active_weeks_last_year8

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 48 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 35 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~89.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count48
latest_release_tagv0.13.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release35
mean_days_between_releases89.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

74Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

65Good
How it's scored
40.9/60Stars — 335 stars
15.7/25Forks — 78 forks
8.5/15Watchers — 35 watchers
Inputs used
forks78
stars335
watchers35
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

72Good
How it's scored
57.2/80Monthly downloads — 19,359 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesakd, akd_core
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads237,695
monthly_downloads19,359
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

85Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

61Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 46% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 15 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled15
top_contributor_share0.465

Issue & PR responsiveness

87Excellent
How it's scored
35.6/42Issue resolution — 85% of issues closed
26.8/30PR acceptance — 322/360 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 24/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs322
open_issues19
closed_issues106
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.848
closed_unmerged_prs38
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 36,748 followers of facebook
25/25Track record — 177 public repos, account ~17 yr old
Inputs used
followers36,748
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginfacebook
public_repos177
account_age_days6,378

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 35 days ago
20/20Version history — 49 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesakd, akd_core
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish35

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

56Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
8/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 14 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/akd
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/akd
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

65Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

64Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
1/2.5CI-Tests — 14 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 24/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
2.2/7.5Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0.5/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

71Good
How it's scored
26.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: paste 1.0.15 (unknown)
12/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: rustix 0.38.10 (moderate 6.5)
32.3/40No advisories left outstanding — 2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,065 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages2
assessed_packages176
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitymoderate 1, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the crates:akd@0.13.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 176 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 80 of 86 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.93
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

64Moderate
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, akd/Cargo.toml, akd_core/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 14 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, akd/Cargo.toml, akd_core/Cargo.toml, examples/Cargo.toml, xtask/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.14

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
54.3/55Manageable file sizes — 1/80 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes92,085
source_files_sampled80
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

80Excellent
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — akd_core/src/proto/specs/types.proto
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesakd_core/src/proto/specs/types.proto
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

335GitHub stars
15contributors
11commits, last 12 months
35days since last push
48releases
2bus factor
19open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • crates package 'xtask' points at a different repository (https://github.com/arcboxlabs/xtask); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 78 ⇿
0Stars
78Forks
46Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0204060807652021-112024-042026-09
Major 0Minor 10Patch 26

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 03:42 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
4CI-Tests14 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 24/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
3Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
1SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 28
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioakd_core0.13.0akd/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-recursion1akd/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1akd/Cargo.toml
crates.iodashmap5akd/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex0.4akd/Cargo.toml
crates.iolog0.4akd/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1akd/Cargo.toml
crates.iocolored2akd/Cargo.toml
crates.ioonce_cell1akd/Cargo.toml
crates.iopaste1akd/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprotobuf3akd/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.9.3akd/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1akd/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1.40akd/Cargo.toml
crates.ioasync-trait0.1akd_core/Cargo.toml
crates.iocurve25519-dalek4akd_core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioed25519-dalek2akd_core/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex0.4akd_core/Cargo.toml
crates.iozeroize1akd_core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioblake31akd_core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioprotobuf3akd_core/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.9.3akd_core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1akd_core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_bytes0.11akd_core/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1akd_core/Cargo.toml
crates.iopaste1akd_core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioxtaskops0.4xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1xtask/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 49

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 21 direct and 28 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioakd_core—direct
crates.ioanyhow—direct
crates.ioasync-recursion—direct
crates.ioasync-trait—direct
crates.ioblake3—direct
crates.iocolored—direct
crates.iocurve25519-dalek—direct
crates.iodashmap—direct
crates.ioed25519-dalek—direct
crates.iohex—direct
crates.iolog—direct
crates.ioonce_cell—direct
crates.iopaste—direct
crates.ioprotobuf—direct
crates.iorand—direct
crates.ioserde—direct
crates.ioserde_bytes—direct
crates.iotokio—direct
crates.iotracing—direct
crates.ioxtaskops—direct
crates.iozeroize—direct
crates.ioassert_fs—indirect
crates.iobincode—indirect
crates.iobytesize—indirect
crates.ioclap—indirect
crates.iocriterion—indirect
crates.ioctor—indirect
crates.iodialoguer—indirect
crates.iofutures—indirect
crates.ioindicatif—indirect
crates.ioitertools—indirect
crates.iomockall—indirect
crates.iomulti_log—indirect
crates.iomysql_async—indirect
crates.iomysql_common—indirect
crates.ioproptest—indirect
crates.ioproptest-derive—indirect
crates.ioprotobuf-codegen—indirect
crates.ioprotobuf-parse—indirect
crates.ioregex—indirect
crates.ioreqwest—indirect
crates.ioserde_json—indirect
crates.ioserde_yaml—indirect
crates.ioserial_test—indirect
crates.iothread-id—indirect
crates.iotokio-test—indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen—indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-test—indirect
crates.ioxml-rs—indirect
Dependency advisories 2

Installing crates:akd@0.13.0 pulls in 176 packages, direct and transitive: 2 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
rustix0.38.10indirectmoderate10.38.19
paste1.0.15directunknown1—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with facebook/akd. Read them side by side →

39vul-os/kotvaKOTVA — the sovereign substrate: a narrow-waist protocol family (identity, signed objects, transport, pub/sub, sync) with mail (DMTAP), commerce (TRACT) and work (WRAP) as profiles. No token.Weak83creatornader/atribVerifiable agent actions. Every action becomes signed context for the next. Ed25519 signatures, Merkle log proofs, independently verifiable by anyone.Excellent19coniks-sys/coniks-javaA CONIKS implementation in JavaCritical100scalar/scalarScalar is an open-source API platform:　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　🌐 Modern REST API Client　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　📖 Beautiful API References　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　✨ 1st-Class OpenAPI/Swagger SupportExceptional100modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdkThe official Rust SDK for the Model Context ProtocolExceptional100microsoft/onnxruntimeONNX Runtime: cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing and training acceleratorExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.